 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, September 17, 2008 |
 |
|


US House passes legislation to lift offshore drilling ban
Andrew Gilmore on September 17, 2008 4:11 PM ET

[JURIST] The US House of Representatives passed proposed legislation [H.R. 6899, PDF] Tuesday night that would partially lift the ban on offshore oil drilling [JURIST news archive] as part of a comprehensive energy proposal. The bill, entitled the "Comprehensive American Energy Security and Consumer Protection Act," was passed by a vote of 236-189 [roll call results]. The Act would authorize drilling activities 50 miles beyond the Pacific or Atlantic coastlines, areas that have been off-limits since 1981 due to a Congressional moratorium which has prevented oil drilling in 85 percent of US coastal waters. Under the new legislation, drilling or other activities would be outlawed in any marine national monument, national marine sanctuary, or the Georges Bank fishing grounds [USGS backgrouder], located off the New England coast in the North Atlantic Ocean. H.R. 6899 must be approved by the US Senate before taking effect. AP has more. The New York Times has additional coverage.
In July, President George W. Bush lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling [JURIST report] put in place during his father's presidential administration. In June, Bush called on Congress to relax restrictions on oil exploration [statement text; JURIST report], saying that it should also allow drilling to begin in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [official website] in Alaska. Bush argued that resources currently off-limits to energy companies could offset rising fuel prices. Environmental organizations have criticized efforts to expand oil drilling [WWF report] in the Arctic, calling for increased research into energy conservation and renewable resources instead. Critics have also said that offshore development will require several years and a massive infrastructure that could impact local wildlife.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Khadr military commission trial delayed until at least November
Joe Shaulis on September 17, 2008 10:49 AM ET

[JURIST] A US military judge has scheduled the trial of Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr [DOD materials; JURIST news archive] for November 10, but the Canadian citizen's lawyer said Tuesday that the date is likely to be pushed back further. According to a schedule set by US Army Col. Patrick Parrish, who is serving as judge for the military commission proceedings [DOD materials; JURIST news archive], the trial would run through November 23 and would resume in December if not completed. Khadr's military lawyer, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Bill Kuebler, said that if Parrish grants a defense motion for independent psychological and psychiatric examinations [Globe and Mail report], another delay in the proceedings is "very likely." Khadr's trial had been scheduled for October [JURIST report], but Parrish postponed it [Toronto Star report] last week so that prosecutors could disclose additional evidence to the defense. Reuters has more. Canadian Press has local coverage.
Khadr faces possible life imprisonment if convicted of crimes allegedly committed at the age of 15 while fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan [JURIST news archive]. He was charged [charge sheet, PDF; JURIST report] in April 2007 with murder, attempted murder, conspiracy, providing material support for terrorism and spying. He is one of four [JURIST report] Guantanamo detainees facing prosecution under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [text, PDF].
Also on Tuesday, Canadian government lawyers argued [Canadian Press report] before an Ontario court that evidence against Khadr's older brother Abdullah should remain secret to protect national security. Abdullah Khadr is facing extradition to the United States on charges [JURIST reports] of membership in a terrorist group and procurement of destructive devices. He has admitted to attending an al Qaeda training camp at age 13 but has denied belonging to the organization or supplying weapons to it. Members of the Khadr family [CBC backgrounder] emigrated to Canada from Egypt in 1977 and are suspected of having ties to Osama bin Laden.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICC arrest of Sudan leader could undermine Darfur efforts: South Africa president
Caitlin Price on September 17, 2008 9:56 AM ET

[JURIST] South African President Thabo Mbeki [official profile] spoke out Tuesday against an International Criminal Court indictment of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], telling reporters [AP report] that the move will jeopardize stability in the Darfur region [JURIST news archive]. Mbeki and Bashir issued a joint statement [text] following two days of meetings, focusing in part on possible negative repercussions of an ICC action: [T]he Pre-Trial Chamber of the application by the International Criminal Court Chief Prosecutor could seriously undermine the ongoing efforts aimed at facilitating the early resolution of the conflict in Darfur and the promotion of long-lasting peace and reconciliation in the Sudan as a whole and, as a result, may lead to further suffering of the people of the Sudan and greater destabilisation with far-reaching consequences for the country and the region. Mbeki instead backed Bashir's People of Sudan Initiative, a political solution seeking "participation of all Sudanese political spectrum including rebel movements, tribal leaders and civil society organisations." The presidents also called for international support of African Union (AU) [official website] troops deployed to Darfur. The South African Star has more.
In July, ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo applied for a warrant to arrest Bashir [JURIST report] on charges of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes for atrocities committed in Darfur. Last month, Bashir threatened to ignore any ICC-issued arrest warrant, saying he would not "deal with or respond to" the ICC. Moreno-Ocampo has criticized Sudan's own investigation [JURIST reports] of war crimes in Darfur, calling it "part of the cover-up." Sudan's justice minister recently appointed several prosecutors to locally investigate and try war crimes suspects in internationally monitored courts [JURIST reports]. Moreno-Ocampo's warrant application has been sharply criticized by the AU and Arab League [official website, in Arabic], among others, which believe that the move threatens to destabilize the region and poses a risk to joint AU-UN peacekeeping forces in the country.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Spain top court bans ETA-linked Basque party from political activities
Leslie Schulman on September 17, 2008 9:50 AM ET

[JURIST] The Spanish Supreme Court [official website] announced Tuesday it has banned the Basque Nationalist Action Party (ANV) [party website] from taking part in any political activities in the country, because of its alleged ties to ETA [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive], the armed Basque separatist movement. According to a request filed by prosecutors [JURIST report] in January, evidence shows that ANV has close ties with Batasuna [BBC backgrounder], ETA's former political arm which was banned by the Supreme Court in 2003. The Court's decision means party activities will be dissolved and all party assets seized by the government. The Court will consider Wednesday whether to also ban the Communist Party of the Basque Lands (PCTV), which prosecutors had included in its January request for the same reasons. Reuters has more.
In February, the Court blocked [JURIST report] both ANV and PCTV from fielding candidates in Spain's March general elections, allowing the government to shut down party offices, freeze their bank accounts, and cut off government funding. According to the Court, Batasuna had used the parties to help circumvent their 2003 ban and participate in politics. ETA, which seeks an independent Basque region in what is currently northern Spain and southwestern France, has been blamed for more than 800 deaths in bombings and attacks since the 1960s.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Sudan calls for end to UN special rapporteur mandate in Darfur
Andrew Gilmore on September 17, 2008 9:25 AM ET

[JURIST] At a meeting of the UN Human Rights Council [official website] in Geneva Tuesday, Sudan called for the Council not to renew the mandate of Sina Samar [official website], the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Sudan, whose term is set to expire in December. The remarks, made by Sudanese Ministry of Justice Under-Secretary Abdel Daiem Zumarawi, came after Special Rapporteur Samar presented the Council with her report [text, PDF] on the situation of human rights in Sudan. In his comments [UN press release], Zumarawi claimed that: by not renewing the mandate, the Council would give further impetus to end the conflict; this would make Sudan fully ready to cooperate with the Human Rights Council...Sudan ha[s] been for many years a victim of politicisation, but...has always answered through collaboration. [sic] He also called on the Council to "commend the collaboration of Sudan." Reuters has more.
Since civil war broke out in Sudan's Darfur region [JURIST news archive] in 2003, it is estimated that over 200,000 people have been killed and 2.5 million displaced. Reports by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) and the International Committee for the Red Cross [official websites] have documented numerous violations of human rights and international humanitarian law [JURIST reports] based on interviews with refugees, rebel groups, and agencies and authorities working in the region.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Senate Judiciary Committee explores limits of presidential powers
Leslie Schulman on September 17, 2008 8:40 AM ET

[JURIST] Witnesses before the US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] on Tuesday presented testimony [video; hearing materials] discussing the Rule of Law and criticizing the White House [official website] for exceeding the limits of constitutional authority during George Bush's presidency. At a Subcommittee on the Constitution [official website] hearing, subcommittee chairman Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) [official website] opened the hearing: [F]or the past seven and a half years, and especially since 9/11, the Bush Administration has treated the Constitution and the rule of law with a disrespect never before seen in the history of this country...That is why I called this hearing to hear from legal and historical experts on how the next President should go about tackling the wreckage that this President will leave. I've asked our two panels of experts who will testify to be forward-looking to not only review what has gone wrong in the past seven or eight years, but to address very specifically what needs to be set right starting next year and how to go about doing it. Read Feingold's full opening statement [text]. Later in the hearing, Brennan Center for Justice [advocacy website] counsel Frederick Schwarz Jr. testified [prepared statement, PDF] that current policies and practices need to be reviewed and amended:The abuses that have taken place must be accounted for. We need to know what went wrong, how it is that mistakes and illegal actions were allowed to occur, and how they have harmed us. When there are allegations that ultimately are proven wrong, they should be aired and names cleared. When the United States has conducted its anti-terrorism policy forthrightly and wisely, it should be commended for doing so. But given the ample evidence that the Administrations unchecked policy is out of balance, it is far more likely that the greatest need is institutional repair and restoration of the rule of law. The Subcommittee went on to hear additional testimony from several members of the legal community, including law professors and other advocacy groups.
In July, the House Judiciary Committee heard similar testimony [JURIST report] from witnesses with sharply divided opinions on whether Bush had overstepped his constitutional authority to a degree which would justify his impeachment. The continued hearings on President Bush's alleged misuse of executive powers follow a number of allegations of wrongdoing. Earlier this year, Bush invoked executive privilege [JURIST report] to prevent members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform [official website] from obtaining an FBI report on an interview with Vice President Dick Cheney concerning the Valerie Plame CIA leak scandal [JURIST news archive]. In June, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General [official website] issued a report [PDF text; JURIST report] admitting that it had improperly granted preferential treatment to politically-conservative internship candidates in 2002 and 2006.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bolivia governor arrested on genocide charges
Joe Shaulis on September 17, 2008 8:12 AM ET

[JURIST] Bolivian President Evo Morales [official website; BBC profile] on Tuesday announced the arrest of a provincial governor and political opponent on genocide charges in connection with the deaths of several Morales supporters [CBC report] during demonstrations last week. Gov. Leopoldo Fernandez [Univision interview, in Spanish], who had refused to recognize Morales' declaration of martial law [Reuters report] in Pando province on Saturday, was taken to La Paz by federal soldiers. At a press conference, Morales defended the governor's arrest [Reuters report] as "legal and constitutional." On Monday, the newly formed Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) implored Bolivians to end the violence [AP report] as it recommended the creation of a commission to mediate negotiations between Morales' government and the opposition, which favors autonomy. Reuters has more. AFP has additional coverage. From La Paz, La Razon has local coverage, in Spanish.
Weeks of regional protests in affluent states opposing Morales' income redistribution proposals culminated in the president's accusation [AFP report] earlier this month that opposition governors were engaged in a "civil coup against democracy." After a national referendum in August permitted Morales to retain his office [JURIST report], he renewed his campaign for constitutional amendments that would distribute more of Bolivia's land and energy resource income to the country's indigenous population. Several of the provincial governors also confirmed by that referendum, including Fernandez, have fought the constitutional reforms [JURIST reports].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|