 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
 |
|


Pakistan ex-PM plans to abandon coalition if reinstatement agreement not reached
Devin Montgomery on August 21, 2008 3:16 PM ET

[JURIST] Former Pakistan prime minister and Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) [party website] head Nawaz Sharif has threatened to withdraw from the government if all of the judges ousted last year by President Pervez Musharraf [official website; JURIST news archive] are not reinstated by Friday, according to a report [AFP report] published Thursday. Lawyers' groups in the country have also demonstrated [News report] against the failure of Pakistan's ruling coalition to reach an agreement on reinstating the judges, after the negotiations between the PML-N and Pakistan People's Party (PPP) failed [JURIST report] on Wednesday. Sharif said that the controversy centers around the reinstatement of former Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry [JURIST news archive], and that his party will withdraw from the government if he is not restored to his position. Also Thursday, Pakistan Attorney General Malik Abdul Qayyum, who was appointed by Musharraf, resigned [Xinhua report] following the former President's decision to step down [press release; JURIST report] on Tuesday. PPP senator Latif Khosa took Qayyum's place.
Earlier this month, the coalition government said that it would push to impeach Musharraf because he had given a "clear commitment" to step down from office after his party was defeated in parliamentary elections [JURIST reports], but subsequently refused to resign or go into exile, and because be had failed to follow through on a promise to ask parliament for a confidence vote. In June, the PML-N called for Musharraf's impeachment [JURIST report] and released a "charge sheet" outlining misuse of presidential authority, including the dismissal of the country's superior court judges. Also in June, PML-N leader and former Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif [JURIST news archive] called for Musharraf to be tried for treason [JURIST report], labeling him a traitor disloyal to Pakistan and saying he should be punished for the "damage" that he has done to the country in the years since he led a military coup [BBC backgrounder] and unseated Sharif in 1999.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Kansas City Diocese reaches settlement with abuse victims
Devin Montgomery on August 21, 2008 2:23 PM ET

[JURIST] ] The Catholic Diocese of Kansas City [official website] announced [Flash, video; press release] on Thursday that it has agreed to pay $10 million to settle 47 sexual abuse claims against the church. The deal also required the church to publicly renounce the alleged behavior and to take additional steps to prevent future instances of abuse. Kansas City Bishop Robert W. Finn made the public announcement:
We apologize for the fully unacceptable behavior that prompted these lawsuits to be brought against the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph. With compassion for the victims of this behavior and with sadness over any failure by the diocese to serve as a proper steward of safety and security for our young people and our parishioners, I am here as an individual leader of the diocese to demonstrate institutional accountability for these sad events. I pray that with the settlement of this matter, the healing for all may truly begin...
...In reaching a settlement with lawyers representing the families involved in this case, we took painstaking steps to fully vet all issues enabling thoroughness to be the hallmark of this process. Assured that we have met that standard, we have agreed to fund $10 million in payments to the victims and to adhere to a number of nonmonetary stipulations that should assure our community, our congregation and these families that the diocese will continue in its exercise of vigilance and in its devotion to training and education so that we may be confident there will never, ever be a repeat of the behaviors, the offenses, or the claims that have been associated with this matter. Many of the priests accused of sexual abuse continue to insist that they are innocent. AP has more. The Kansas City Star has local coverage.
Other dioceses across the country have reached similar settlements. In September 2007, the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh [diocesan website] announced [JURIST report] the creation of a $1.25 million fund and the Catholic Diocese of San Diego [diocesan website] announced an agreement [JURIST report] to pay $198.1 million to settle claims of sexual abuse by their clergy. A Los Angeles Superior Court in July 2007 approved a $660 million settlement [JURIST report] between the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles [diocesan website] and plaintiffs in 508 outstanding clergy sex abuse lawsuits. In January 2007, the Catholic Diocese of Spokane [diocesan website] agreed to settle molestation claims [JURIST report] against its own priests for $48 million as part of its Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization plan. The Archdiocese of Portland filed for Chapter 11 [JURIST report] in 2004, and the dioceses of Tuscon, Spokane, and Davenport soon followed suit in the wake of hundreds of sexual abuse lawsuits [JURIST news archive] against clergy.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICC prosecutor reviewing Georgia conflict for war crimes
Abigail Salisbury on August 21, 2008 1:40 PM ET

[JURIST] International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo [official profile] announced [press release] on Wednesday that his office is reviewing allegations [Reuters report] that war crimes have been committed during the recent conflict over Georgia's breakaway region of South Ossetia [BBC report]. On Monday, Russian officials had expressed their intent to file a complaint [JURIST report] against Georgia with the ICC, and said that their government is considering filing another complaint with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) [official website]. Russia's Foreign Ministry has also called for Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili to be tried for war crimes before the ICC. Last week, Georgia filed a complaint [text, PDF; press release, PDF] against Russia with the ICJ, alleging that invading Russian troops have also engaged in the murder, rape and mass displacement of civilians [JURIST report].
Moreno-Ocampo has recently come under heavy criticism for his prosecutorial tactics and choices. Earlier this week, the president of Human Rights Watch [official website], mediation advisors, and other NGO leaders expressed doubt regarding his judgment [The Guardian report; JURIST report] and concern that his behavior could threaten the credibility of the court. Moreno-Ocampo has also received sharp criticism from both the League of Arab States (LAS) and the African Union (AU) [official websites] for his decision to seek the arrest [JURIST report] of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir [BBC profile, JURIST news archive]. In June, a Sudanese ambassador was quoted as calling Moreno-Ocampo a "terrorist" [JURIST report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK court rules Foreign Office must release evidence to Guantanamo detainee
Abigail Salisbury on August 21, 2008 12:02 PM ET

[JURIST] London's High Court on Thursday ruled [PDF, judgment] that the UK Foreign Office must turn over evidence [Independent report] "essential" to the defense of Binyam Mohamed [Reprieve profile], the last British resident still detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. Lawyers representing Mohamed at his US military commission trial had appeared [JURIST report] before the High Court in July, arguing that the Foreign Office possessed evidence showing that Mohamed was tortured and went through extraordinary rendition [JURIST news archive]. A Foreign Office spokesperson commented [press release]: For strong reasons of national security, to which the Court accepted we were entitled to give the highest weight, we could not agree to disclose this information voluntarily. These and other issues relating to national security will be considered at a further hearing next week. Mohamed's lawyers have also asked the Irish government [Irish Times report] to turn over information about CIA rendition flights [JURIST news archive] which allegedly landed in Ireland in 2002 and 2004 while transporting Mohamed.
Mohamed says he was arrested in Pakistan and turned over to US officials who later transferred him to Moroccan agents who tortured him; he was later transferred to Guantanamo Bay in 2004. In December, in a letter [DOC, text] sent by his lawyer to UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband, he asked the UK government [JURIST report] to ensure that photographic evidence of his alleged torture be preserved. For most of 2007, Binyam was one of five UK residents detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. Three of those were released [press release; JURIST report] from US custody in December. The official status of a fourth detainee remains unclear.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Sixth Circuit upholds Tennessee school ban on wearing Confederate flag
Abigail Salisbury on August 21, 2008 11:19 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit [official website] on Wednesday affirmed [opinion, PDF] a district court's grant of summary judgment to a Tennessee public high school in a lawsuit brought by three students who claimed the school's ban on wearing the Confederate flag [university course backgrounder] violated their First Amendment, Equal Protection, and Due Process rights under the US Constitution. The students had argued that they wanted to wear the flag on their clothing to express their pride in their southern heritage. The Sixth Circuit carefully limited its holding in the case: We caution, however, that our decision today does not establish a precedent justifying a schools ban on student speech merely because other students find that speech offensive: we simply hold that the schools dress code as applied to ban the Confederate flag is constitutional because of the disruptive potential of the flag in a school where racial tension is high and serious racially motivated incidents, such as physical altercations or threats of violence, have occurred. The court reasoned that there was no First Amendment violation because "the school reasonably forecast that images of the Confederate flag would substantially and materially disrupt the school environment," held that the Equal Protection guarantee was not infringed because "the dress codes ban on racially divisive symbols" satisfied intermediate scrutiny, and determined that the students had forfeited their Due Process claim by not sufficiently developing it. AP has more.
In 2003, the Fourth Circuit [official website] upheld [JURIST report] the dismissal of a suit filed by Matthew Dixon, a man who was fired for displaying Confederate flag stickers at work [New York Times report]. South Carolina's Coburn Dairy, Inc. fired Dixon for continuing to display the stickers on his toolbox after a black co-worker complained. Dixon argued that the company violated his First Amendment rights and state employment laws, but the company maintained that Dixon was fired because he violated the company's harassment policy.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Chicago group files challenge to Illinois public school funding system
Kiely Lewandowski on August 21, 2008 9:34 AM ET

[JURIST] The Chicago Urban League (CUL) [advocacy website] on Wednesday filed a lawsuit insisting that Illinois' current school funding scheme be declared unconstitutional in violation of the Illinois Civil Rights Act of 2003 [text]. CUL challenges [complaint, PDF] the state's method for raising and distributing education funds to local school districts, which it claims results in "constitutionally inadequate educational opportunities for hundreds of thousands of Illinois public school children." CUL asserts that the state's public school funding scheme is "fatally flawed" because it relies too heavily on local property taxes, therefore reinforcing past discrimination and ensuring that certain school districts have "no capacity to raise the revenues they desperately need to close the funding gap," explaining: the continuous and unmitigated harm that results each year from the state's persistent failure to meet its constitutional obligation to treat all students equally, regardless of race or ethnicity, to provide all Illinois students with access to equal education opportunity and to provide a system of schools offering a "high quality" education, is irreparable and unconscionable. CUL President Cheryle R. Jackson said [press release]: Our children, especially African Americans and Latinos, have been left behind because of poorly funded schools while their white counterparts in wealthy communities are thriving. Their basic right to a quality education is being denied. Through our litigation and civic engagement around this issue, we want to make sure no more children are given a second-class education. The Chicago Tribune has local coverage; Reuters has more.
Last year, the US Supreme Court ruled [JURIST report] on New Mexico's public school funding system, and found that the US Department of Education is permitted by statute to refer to the number of students in a school district as well as the per-student expenditures in school districts when determining whether a state "equalizes expenditures" among public school districts.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|