 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, July 1, 2008 |
 |
|


Italy court overrules 'racial hatred' convictions of anti-Roma group
Mike Rosen-Molina on July 1, 2008 1:57 PM ET

[JURIST] The Italian Court of Cassation [official website] Monday overturned the convictions of six Italians, including Verona Mayor Flavio Tosi, for distributing anti-Roma literature in 2001. The court found that the men were motivated by a belief that all Roma are thieves, but held that this motivation did not amount to "racial hatred" under existing Italian anti-discrimination laws. The decision is expected to draw anger from human rights groups and Roma advocates [European Roma Rights Centre website]. It was speculated that the release of the ruling, which was handed down in March, was timed to bolster recent government plans to fingerprint [JURIST report] the nation's entire Roma population. Interior Minister Roberto Maroni [OECD profile] said that the fingerprinting would help to reduce street begging and keep children in school, but opponents immediately criticized it as a method of "ethnic screening." The Guardian has more.
In November 2005, the European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) [advocacy website] reported that Roma minorities are the ethnic group most susceptible to racism in the European Union [JURIST report]. Two years later, in November 2007, the European Court of Human Rights rejected [JURIST report] the educational separation of Roma children in the Czech Republic, holding that the practice amounted to racial discrimination and violated principles of human rights.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ruling released on Uighur enemy combatant status at Guantanamo
Mike Rosen-Molina on July 1, 2008 1:28 PM ET

[JURIST] A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit Monday released declassified portions of last month's decision [PDF text] that a US Combatant Status Review Tribunal [DOD materials] had improperly designated a Chinese Uighur Muslim [JURIST news archive] detained at Guantanamo Bay as an enemy combatant. In the opinion, Circuit Judge Merrick Garland dismissed government arguments that classified documents established Huzaifa Parhat's terror connections: First, the government suggests that several of the assertions in the intelligence documents are reliable because they are made in at least three different documents. We are not persuaded. ... In fact, we have no basis for concluding that there are independent sources for the documents' thrice-made assertions. To the contrary, as noted in Part III, many of those assertions are made in identical language, suggesting that later documents may merely be citing earlier ones, and hence that all may ultimately derive from a single source. And as we have also noted, Parhat has made a credible argument that - at least for some of the assertions - the common source is the Chinese government, which may be less than objective with respect to the Uighurs. Other assertions in the documents may ultimately rely on interview reports (not provided to the Tribunal) of Uighur detainees, who may have had no first-hand knowledge and whose speculations may have been transformed into certainties in the course of being repeated by report writers. Last month, the court ordered [PDF text] the US government to release or transfer Parhat. Barring release or transfer, the order directed the US to "expeditiously hold a new Tribunal consistent with the court's opinion." Parhat can challenge his detention in federal court and seek immediate release through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to the US Supreme Court's ruling in Boumediene v. Bush [opinion, PDF; JURIST report]. The New York Times has more.
In April, US Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers defended Parhat's detention [JURIST report] in oral arguments before the court, claiming he is an "enemy combatant" due to his ties with the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) [MIPT backgrounder], a militant group that calls for separation from China and was designated as a terrorist group by the US government in 2002. The DOJ acknowledged that Parhat did not fight against the US and that there is no evidence that he intended to do so, but said he can still be held under the Authorization for Use of Military Force Act of 2001 [SJ Res 23 materials] because ETIM is affiliated with al Qaeda. In 2006, five Chinese Uighur detainees were released to Albania [JURIST report], where officials reviewed applications for asylum. The transfer, which was criticized by China, ended a court challenge against the detainees' indefinite detention [JURIST reports]. In December 2006, lawyers for seven Uighur detainees filed a lawsuit [JURIST report], arguing that the process by which they were determined to be enemy combatants was flawed.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Hungary constitutional court strikes down hate speech amendments
Mike Rosen-Molina on July 1, 2008 12:30 PM ET

[JURIST] The Constitutional Court of Hungary [official website] Monday ruled that two proposals passed by the country's parliament to criminalize hate speech were unconstitutional infringements on the freedom of expression. The court held that the extremist speech that the amendments sought to prevent was not a danger to society because it was already marginalized. The first bill, passed last year, would have allowed recovery in cases where a person's ethnic group - rather than the individual person - was insulted. The second bill, passed in February [Politics.hu report], would have designated national, ethnic, racial, or religious insults as misdemeanors punishable by up to two years in prison. In March, Hungarian President Laszlo Solyom [official website] requested that the Constitutional Court rule on the constitutionality of the two amendments before they took effect. AFP has more.
Balancing free speech interests with anti-hate efforts has also been a difficult task for other European governments in recent years. In 2006, British politicians, writers and comedians urged members of the UK House of Commons [official website] to accept freedom of speech revisions in the controversial Racial and Religious Hatred Bill [text; BBC Q/A]. The bill was amended [official amendments; JURIST report] in the British House of Lords [official website] in 2005 when peers voted to restrict punishable actions to "threatening words or behavior" rather than including words which may be insulting or abusive, which critics said would unfairly infringe upon comedians [JURIST report] and writers who satirize religion.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ex-Khmer Rouge official appeals detention for Cambodia genocide
Andrew Gilmore on July 1, 2008 11:55 AM ET

[JURIST] Ieng Sary [TrialWatch profile; JURIST news archive], former Foreign Minister during the Khmer Rouge regime [BBC backgrounder], appeared before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia (ECCC) [court website] for the second day Tuesday to appeal his detention on genocide charges. Lawyers for Sary, whose appearance at the ECCC had been set last weekend [scheduling order, PDF; hearing invitation, PDF], have asked for his release due to ill-health [JURIST report], and have also argued that a genocide trial in the ECCC would constitute double jeopardy, since he was pardoned [NYT report] by King Norodom Sihanouk on similar charges in 1996. Sary and his wife, Ieng Thirith, who served as Minister for Social Affairs, were arrested [PDF press release; JURIST report] in November 2007 and charged [JURIST report] with crimes against humanity and war crimes for breaches of the Geneva Convention [text] based on their role in the Khmer Rouge regime. AFP has more. AP has additional coverage.
Ieng Sary's 1996 pardon has been challenged as a violation of international law in a response [PDF text] to a previous hearing. The response characterized the pardon as non-binding with respect to the ECCC, which was established by in 2001 to investigate and try surviving Khmer Rouge officials. According to published proceedings [PDF text], Sary is punishable under articles 5, 6, 29, and 39 of the Law on the Establishment of the ECCC [text]. The Khmer Rouge is generally held responsible for the genocide of an estimated 1.7 million Cambodians [PPU backgrounder] who died between 1975 and 1979. To date, no top Khmer Rouge officials have faced trial. Sary and Thirith are two of five former Khmer Rouge leaders in the custody of the court, including former Khmer Rouge head of state Khieu Samphan [JURIST news archive].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court dismisses Arar rendition lawsuit
Devin Montgomery on July 1, 2008 11:33 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] Tuesday dismissed [decision, PDF] a lawsuit brought by Canadian citizen Maher Arar [advocacy website; JURIST news archive], who sought a declaratory judgment against US government officials for deporting him to Syria. The court ruled that Arar had failed to state a claim for which it had jurisdiction to grant relief: We do not doubt that if Congress were so inclined, it could exercise its powers under the Constitution to authorize a cause of action for money damages to redress the type of claims asserted by Arar in this action. The fact remains, however, that Congress has not done so. Instead, it has chosen to establish a remedial process that does not include a cause of action for damages against US officials for injuries arising from the exercise of their discretionary authority to remove inadmissible aliens. We are not free to be indifferent to the determinations of Congress, or to ignore the Supreme Court's instructions to exercise great caution when considering whether to devise new and heretofore unknown, causes of action. The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), which represented Arar, expressed disappointment [press release] at the ruling, pointing to the court's dissenting opinion that the ruling would allow the government to "violate constitutional rights with virtual impunity." Reuters has more. Canadian Press has additional coverage.
Arar was detained by the US in 2002 after flying to New York from Tunisia on his way home to Canada. He was later tansferred to Syria, where he alleges he was tortured. Arar had argued [CCR press release] that he should be able to challenge the US government's policy of extraordinary rendition [JURIST news archive] under the Torture Victim Protection Act [text] and the Fifth Amendment [text] of the US Constitution. In October 2007, US lawmakers apologized [JURIST report] to Arar during a joint hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee [official website]. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testified [recorded video] in front of the same committee that Arar's rendition was not "handled as it should have been," but stopped short of apologizing. Rice added that the US government has told the Canadian government that it will "try to do better in the future." In January 2007, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper apologized to Arar [JURIST report] on behalf of the Canadian government and announced a settlement of $10.5 million (CAD) compensation for pain and suffering.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Suspect in Russia journalist murder hiding in Western Europe: investigator
Deirdre Jurand on July 1, 2008 11:08 AM ET

[JURIST] The man suspected of killing Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya [BBC obituary; JURIST news archive] has fled to Western Europe, an investigator at the Russian Prosecutor General's Office [official website, English version] said Tuesday. In May, Russian authorities named Chechen Rustam Makhmudov as the main suspect in the murder, charging him in absentia [Moscow News report] and issuing an international warrant for his arrest. In June, authorities formally charged [JURIST report] Sergey Khadzhikurbanov and Rustam's brothers Dzhabrail and Ibragim Makhmudov in connection with the murder while the search for Rustam continued. Investigators said they know which country Rustam is in, but declined to specify. Reuters has more. RIA Novosti has local coverage.
Politkovskaya wrote for the Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta [media website, in Russian], and had reported extensively on the conflict between the Russian army and separatist forces in Chechnya beginning in 1999. She was shot [JURIST report] in the head and chest after returning to her Moscow apartment building on October 7, 2006. She was a well-known critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin [official website; JURIST news archive], and authored two books on Chechnya. Russian Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika [official website] has said that Politkovskaya's murder was orchestrated by a Moscow-based Chechen criminal group specializing in contract killings.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

China accused of using courts to retaliate against journalists critical of government
Andrew Gilmore on July 1, 2008 10:13 AM ET

[JURIST] A Chinese reporter for US-based Chinese news website Boxun.com [news website, in Chinese] received a four-year prison sentence Tuesday in Nanjing on charges of illegal weapons possession and public disorder. Sun Lin, who writes under the pen name Jie Mu, has reported on sensitive topics including crime, police brutality, and corruption in China, and Boxun said Sun was being punished for his work. His wife, He Fang, a Boxun contributor, received a suspended sentence for similar charges. The two have been in Chinese custody since their arrest [Asia Media report] in May 2007. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) [advocacy website] condemned Sun's sentence, calling it [RSF press release] "yet another tragic example of the government's inability to tolerate journalists who dare to report news freely, without constraint or censorship." AP has more.
China has continued to stifle dissent, including arresting and imprisoning journalists and writers, in the run-up to the 2008 Olympic Games, being held this summer in Beijing. In February, a Chinese court convicted dissident writer Lu Gengsong on charges of subversion [JURIST report], sentencing him to four years in prison for writing essays exposing corruption within the Communist Party of China. Earlier this year, the Chinese government violently suppressed demonstrations and protests in Tibet [JURIST news archive], detaining thousands.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US fails to protect against unlawful executions: UN investigator
Devin Montgomery on July 1, 2008 9:14 AM ET

[JURIST] The US does not appropriately protect its citizens and foreign nationals from executions that are out of line with international law, UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Philip Alston [advocacy profile] said [statement, PDF; video, RM] Monday. Alston said state death penalty systems need stronger safeguards against racial bias [JURIST report] and wrongful convictions. He added that investigations into the deaths of foreign detainees held in US custody [JURIST report] are often insufficient, due process protections are inadequate for those facing the death penalty under the Military Commissions Act [PDF text; JURIST news archive], and US military contractors are not held accountable [JURIST report] for killings committed abroad. Summarizing his findings, Alston said: If there is a single theme that emerges from my visit it is the need for greater transparency in relation to a number of issues of major importance... I was frequently told by Government officials that although they were unable to answer my specific questions, I should rest assured that there was accountability. Whether or not it does in fact exist, this private or internal accountability cannot take the place of genuine, public accountability. A Government open and accountable to its people is a foundational premise of a democratic state. Alston, who is also a law professor at NYU, presented the report [press release] after an investigation [JURIST report] into both the formal death penalty system and extrajudicial killings. AFP has more. Reuters has additional coverage.
The US had been under a de-facto moratorium [JURIST report] on the death penalty from September 2007 until April of this year, as the US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] considered Baze v. Rees [Duke law case backgrounder; JURIST report], a case which challenged the legality of Kentucky's lethal injection protocol. The Court upheld the procedure, ruling that it did not violate the Constitution's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. In another landmark decision Kennedy v. Louisiana [Duke Law backgrounder; JURIST report], the Court held that a death sentence does constitute cruel and unusual punishment when imposed for a crime in which the victim was not killed.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ex-Abu Ghraib detainees sue military contractors for torture
Deirdre Jurand on July 1, 2008 8:36 AM ET

[JURIST] Four former Abu Ghraib [JURIST news archive] detainees filed lawsuits [CCR materials] Monday against two private US military contractors and three of their employees, alleging torture, war crimes and civil conspiracy. The former detainees said that employees of CACI International and L-3 Communications [corporate websites], which performed interrogation and interpretation work for the US military, violated the Geneva Convention, the Army Field Manual [texts] and US law by torturing and conspiring to torture the detainees. They further alleged that CACI and L-3 negligently failed to prevent the torture. In a statement [text], CACI responded: After numerous and thorough government investigations, no CACI employee or former employee has been charged with any misconduct in connection with CACI's interrogation work in Iraq. CACI has unequivocally renounced the abuse that occurred at Abu Ghraib prison and has cooperated fully in all government inquiries of this matter. CACI does not condone or tolerate illegal or inappropriate behavior by any employee when engaged in CACI business. The men are seeking a jury trial and all remedies available to them, including compensatory damages, punitive damages and court costs. AFP has more.
In May, another former Abu Ghraib detainee filed a lawsuit [JURIST report] against CACI and L-3 alleging torture and conspiracy. Last year, US District Judge James Robertson refused to dismiss [order, PDF; JURIST report] a class action lawsuit [CCR materials] against CACI alleging torture. Robertson dismissed a similar lawsuit against L-3 subsidiary Titan, saying that Titan's translators worked under the military's exclusive supervision and control. Robertson concluded, though, that "a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that CACI retained significant authority to manage its employees." An amended complaint [complaint, PDF; JURIST report] alleged that CACI was responsible for the torture of more than 250 former detainees held in Iraqi prisons.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|