DOJ admits overlooking military law in Supreme Court child rape case Devin Montgomery at 8:30 AM ET
[JURIST] The US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] said Wednesday that it had mistakenly failed to brief the Supreme Court [official website] on the existence of a military law [PDF text] allowing capital punishment for child rape before the court decided the case of Kennedy v. Louisiana [Duke Law backgrounder; JURIST report]. In Kennedy, the court held 5-4 [JURIST report] that a death sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment when imposed for a crime in which the victim was not killed. The majority supported its reasoning by saying that very few states had such laws and that - incorrectly - there were no federal laws allowing the punishment for rape. In its admission, the DOJ noted that a 2006 amendment to the Uniform Code of Military Conduct [LII materials] does in fact allow the death penalty at court-martial for rape and child rape. Lousiana Governor Bobby Jindal [official website] has said lawyers for the state are considering whether or not to petition the court to reconsider the case. The oversight was first raised [CAAFlog post] Saturday by a civilian Air Force lawyer in his blog on military justice. The New York Times has more. The Washington Times has additional coverage.
The Supreme Court's holding reversed a 2007 decision [PDF text] by the Supreme Court of Louisiana. The high court ruling has already been criticized by a wide range of lawmakers.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.