 |
|

Legal news from Monday, March 31, 2008 |
 |
|


Tajiks admit to killing Russian TV reporter: officials
Mike Rosen-Molina on March 31, 2008 8:33 PM ET

[JURIST] Two Tajikistani men have admitted to killing Russian journalist Ilyas Shurpayev [personal blog], Tajikistani Interior Ministry officials said Monday. Shurpayev, a correspondent for Russia's state-run Channel One [media website, in Russian], was found dead [JURIST report] in his Moscow apartment earlier this month with stab wounds and a belt around his neck when firefighters responded to a fire, apparently set after the attack. The two suspects have reportedly said they to killed Shurpayev during a robbery. It was not clear if the two would be extradited to Russia. AP has more.
Hours before his death, Shurpayev reportedly made a blog post complaining that he had been banned from writing columns for a newspaper in the violence-plagued southern Russian territory of Dagestan and saying "I am now a dissident." Over a dozen reporters have been killed in Russia since 2000, many in apparent retaliation for reporting on alleged corruption or human rights violations. Late last week, Russian prosecutors said they were still actively searching [Moscow Times report] for a person said responsible for the October 2006 slaying of Anna Politkovskaja [JURIST news archive], who reported on human rights abuses in the neighboring region of Chechnya.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

New climate change treaty negotiations begin in Bangkok
Andrew Gilmore on March 31, 2008 6:49 PM ET

[JURIST] Negotiations on a new international treaty to combat global warming [EPA materials; NRDC Q&A; JURIST news archive] began Monday in Bangkok. The week-long negotiations, part of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) [official website], are intended to establish an agenda [UNFCCC press release, PDF] for the negotiation of a new agreement to replace the expiring Kyoto Protocol [text; JURIST news archive].
Pursuant to the Bali Roadmap [PDF text; JURIST report] negotiated in Bali, Indonesia, in December 2007, the 187 participating nations pledge to finalize a new agreement at an up-coming meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark, by the end of 2009. The new deal is expected to enter into force by 2013, following the expiration of the Kyoto Protocol in 2012. The New York Times has more. The UN News Service has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Greece justice ministry to study impact of legalizing same-sex marriage
Andrew Gilmore on March 31, 2008 6:12 PM ET

[JURIST] The Greek Ministry of Justice [official website, in Greek] has agreed to establish a working group to analyze the potential impact of recognizing same-sex civil marriages in Greece, according to Monday media reports. The move comes after the Greek National Commission for Human Rights [official website, in Greek] proposed legislation to allow same-sex marriage in the country. RIA Novosti has more.
Currently, Belgium, Spain, and the Netherlands are the only European countries to recognize same-sex marriage, although a number of others, including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Denmark, and Croatia, recognize some form of civil union or registered partnership [ILGA backgrounder].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Fort Dix plot accomplice sentenced to 20 months in prison
Alexis Unkovic on March 31, 2008 4:53 PM ET

[JURIST] New Jersey US District Judge Robert Kugler Monday sentenced Albanian Kosovar refugee Agron Abdullahu [criminal complaint, PDF], one of the six men arrested [JURIST report] in May for plotting an attack on New Jersey's Fort Dix [official website], to 20 months in prison. In October 2007, Abdullahu pleaded guilty to charges of "conspiring to provide firearms and ammunition" [press release, PDF; JURIST report] to the other five men, all foreign-born Muslims in their 20s, whom he knew to be illegal immigrants and who allegedly plotted to kill soldiers at Fort Dix. Abdullahu, who was granted asylum in the US eight years ago after fleeing Kosovo, will likely face deportation after serving his sentence. He originally faced up to five years in federal prison. AP has more.
The five alleged plotters of the attack pleaded not guilty in January to additional charges filed against them [JURIST reports], including attempted murder. Prosecutors say their trial will probably last four to six weeks, and jury selection is scheduled for September 29. If convicted, the suspects face life sentences.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court takes two First Amendment cases
Alexis Unkovic on March 31, 2008 2:03 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Monday agreed to hear two cases [order list, PDF] involving the First Amendment Monday, including Pleasant Grove City v. Summum (07-665) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], in which the Court will consider whether a private, religious group can donate a monument for display in a public park. Specifically, the Court must decide whether the situation implicates government speech or private speech under the First Amendment [text], and then reconcile whether the local government has the right to select which monuments it displays in the park or whether a public forum exists, thereby nullifying such a right. The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled [opinion, PDF] in 2007 that the Utah park at issue constituted a public forum and that the privately-donated monument embodied the donor's private speech interests. AP has more.
The Court also granted certiorari Monday in Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association (07-869) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], in which it will consider whether certain sections of the Idaho Voluntary Contributions Act [text] unconstitutionally abridge labor unions' free speech rights as related to payroll deductions for political activities. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled [opinion, PDF] in October that the Idaho statute, "as applied to local government employers, violates the First Amendment because it is a content-based law for which the State officials assert no compelling justification." AP has more. SCOTUSblog has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Proposed US financial regulatory overhaul would merge SEC, CFTC
Joshua Pantesco on March 31, 2008 12:26 PM ET

[JURIST] US Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr. [official profile] unveiled a plan [factsheet, PDF] to overhaul the nation's financial regulatory system and merge key federal administrative agencies in remarks at a press conference [transcript] in Washington Monday. The executive summary [text] of the Treasury's Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory Structure [PDF text] described the initiative as presenting a series of "short-term" and "intermediate-term" recommendations that could immediately improve and reform the U.S. regulatory structure. The short-term recommendations focus on taking action now to improve regulatory coordination and oversight in the wake of recent events in the credit and mortgage markets. The intermediate recommendations focus on eliminating some of the duplication of the U.S. regulatory system, but more importantly try to modernize the regulatory structure applicable to certain sectors in the financial services industry (banking, insurance, securities, and futures) within the current framework. If enacted in full, the Treasury's suggested changes would be the most comprehensive overhaul of financial regulatory systems since the current system was devised in the wake of the Great Depression.
Among other things, the Blueprint contemplates the eventual merger of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) [official websites]. CFTC Chairman Walt Lukken adopted a cautious attitude towards that recommendation Monday, saying in a statement [text] that "The CFTC is a world-class regulator because of its focused mission, market expertise, manageable size, problem solving culture and global outlookall of which may be jeopardized with the creation of a larger regulatory bureaucracy." SEC chair Christopher Cox, however, welcomed [statement text] the Treasury approach, suggesting that "recent events have provided further evidence, if more were needed, that financial services regulation in the United States needs to be better integrated among fewer agencies, with clearer lines of responsibility."
The US Chamber of Commerce supports comprehensive reform [press release] of the financial regulatory scheme; Christopher Dodd (D-CT), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee Chairman, was quoted by AP as that the overhaul would not cure the ongoing housing-credit crunch. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules for Delaware in state water boundary dispute
Jeannie Shawl on March 31, 2008 10:04 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Monday that New Jersey and Delaware have "overlapping authority" to control "extraordinary" construction projects along the Delaware River. The Court's decision came in New Jersey v. Delaware [Medill case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court revisited the century-old water boundary dispute between the two states. New Jersey filed a lawsuit [JURIST report] against Delaware in 2005 over British Petroleum's plans to build a liquefied natural gas plant on New Jersey's side of the Delaware River. Delaware refused to approve construction of a 2,000-foot pier that would serve the facility. Under boundary determinations settled by the Supreme Court in 1934 in New Jersey v. Delaware, Delaware controls the river up to the mean low-tide mark on the New Jersey shore, but New Jersey asked the Court to declare that a 1905 interstate compact gives it the right to control riparian access and structures on its side of the river, even if they extend across the border. A Court-appointed Special Master found [report, PDF] in 2007 that Delaware has the authority to block the pier.
The Court agreed with the Special Master's report, writing: We accept the Special Master's recommendation in principal part. Article VII of the 1905 Compact, we hold, did not secure to New Jersey exclusive jurisdiction over all riparian improvements commencing on its shores. The parties' own conduct, since the time Delaware has endeavored to regulate coastal development, supports the conclusion to which other relevant factors point: New Jersey and Delaware have overlapping authority to regulate riparian structures and operations of extraordinary character extending outshore of New Jersey's domain into territory over which Delaware is sovereign. The Court concluded:Given the authority over riparian rights that the 1905 Compact preserves for New Jersey, Delaware may not impede ordinary and usual exercises of the right of riparian owners to wharf out from New Jersey's shore. The Crown Landing project, however, goes well beyond the ordinary or usual.... Consistent with the scope of its retained police power to regulate certain riparian uses, it was within Delaware's authority to prohibit construction of the facility within its domain. Read the Court's opinion [text] per Justice Ginsburg, along with a partial concurrence and partial dissent [text] from Justice Stevens and a dissent [text] from Justice Scalia. Justice Breyer did not participate in consideration or decision of the case. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Myanmar draft constitution entrenches military, blocks Suu Kyi: report
Joshua Pantesco on March 31, 2008 9:38 AM ET

[JURIST] The draft constitution [JURIST news archive] of Myanmar [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive], slated to be put before the country's citizens in a May referendum, contains a provision reserving 25 percent of parliamentary seats for the military, and another provision that will effectively prevent pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] from seeking the presidency or a seat in parliament due to her foreign husband, according to AP, which reported Monday that it had obtained a copy of the secret document. The draft constitution also provides a mechanism by which the president may cede legislative, executive, and judicial functions to the military for up to one year in the event of a state of emergency. It further requires that any constitutional amendments must receive support from at least 75 percent of parliament, which effectively guarantees that the military will have veto power over any unwelcome amendments.
The Myanmar constitution-drafting process has come under fire [JURIST report] from critics who have urged citizens to reject the proposed referendum, saying it is a "sham" to legalize military rule. Other opponents, including supporters of Suu Kyi, have stopped just short of calling for a boycott. Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, has been governed without a constitution since the military regime took power in 1988 and talks on a new national charter [JURIST report] have been underway for 14 years. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|