 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, February 28, 2008 |
 |
|


One in 100 US adults in prison: Pew report
Nick Fiske on February 28, 2008 6:56 PM ET

[JURIST] One in every 100 US adults is currently in prison, according to a report [PDF text; press release] released Thursday by the Pew Center on the States (PCS) [organization website]. The report found that males were 17 times more likely than females to be imprisoned, and that African Americans and Hispanics faced significantly higher incarceration rates than Caucasians. Since 1987, the national prison population has nearly tripled and state spending on corrections has skyrocketed to $44 billion per year, increases that the report attributed to the prevalence of stiffer sentences for nonviolent crimes and repeat offenders during the 1980s and 90s. In all, the nation's prisons house roughly 1.6 million inmates, more than any other country in the world. AP has more. The New York Times has additional coverage.
Rising numbers of inmates in US prisons has been a concern for years. The US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) [official website] reported late last year that nationwide over two million people were in prison or jail in 2006 [JURIST report], with a total of 7.2 million people behind bars, on probation or on parole. The US prison and jail population added prisoners [press release; JURIST report] at a rate of 2.6 percent and more than 1,000 new inmates a week from mid-2004 to mid-2005, according to another 2006 BJS report [summary; PDF text]. A report [PDF text] released in November 2007 by the JFA Institute [advocacy website] concluded that the US prison population is currently eight times as high as it was in 1970 [JURIST report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Pelosi urges grand jury probe into Bolten, Miers contempt of Congress charges
Mike Rosen-Molina on February 28, 2008 6:24 PM ET

[JURIST] US Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) [official website] Thursday called for the US Justice Department to launch a grand jury investigation to determine if misdemeanor contempt of Congress charges [H Res 979 materials] should be prosecuted against former White House legal counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten [official profiles] for failing to cooperate with an inquiry into the US Attorneys firing scandal [JURIST news archive]. Pelosi made the request in letters [text] sent to US Attorney General Michael Mukasey and US Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeffrey Taylor, saying to Mukasey: There is no authority by which persons may wholly ignore a subpoena and fail to appear as directed because a President unilaterally instructs them to do so. Even if a subpoenaed witness intends to assert a privilege in response to questions, the witness is not at liberty to disregard the subpoena and fail to appear at the required time and place. Surely, your Department would not tolerate that type of action if the witness were subpoenaed to a federal grand jury. Short of a formal assertion of executive privilege, which cannot be made in this case, there is no authority that permits a President to advise anyone to ignore a duly issued congressional subpoena for documents.
Your press spokesman has stated that you will "act promptly" to review this matter and reach a final decision. We will appreciate your acting with appropriate dispatch on this important matter. I strongly urge you to reconsider your position and to ensure that our nation is operating under the rule of law and not at presidential whim. If, however, you intend to persist in preventing Mr. Taylor from carrying out his statutory obligation to present this matter to the grand jury in the District of Columbia, we respectfully request that you inform us of that decision within one week from today, so that the House may proceed with a civil enforcement suit in federal district court. The Justice Department has not commented on the letters, but the White House described Pelosi's request as "truly contemptible." AP has more.
Earlier this month, members of the House voted [JURIST report] to hold Miers in contempt of Congress [Cornell Law backgrounder] for failing to testify and both Miers and Bolten in contempt for refusing to produce documents related to the 2006-2007 firings. The White House has said that the information sought in the inquiry is protected by executive privilege [press briefing transcript] and that both Miers and Bolten are immune from prosecution.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court denies injunction against Arizona immigration law
Nick Fiske on February 28, 2008 5:52 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Thursday upheld [order, PDF; ACLU press release] a district court's denial [JURIST report] of an emergency injunction to block enforcement of an Arizona law that penalizes employers who hire illegal immigrants while opponents of the law argue their case [ACLU materials] before the appellate court. Civil rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, filed a lawsuit and application for a temporary restraining order [PDF texts] against the Legal Arizona Workers Act [AZHB 2779 text, PDF; Arizona Republic backgrounder] in December 2007, alleging that the Act could either cause irreparable injury or undue hardship to state employers if allowed to operate during trial.
The Legal Arizona Workers Act, which went into effect on January 1, allows the Superior Courts of Arizona to suspend or revoke the business licenses of businesses that intentionally or knowingly employ illegal immigrants. Under the law, employers will be required to check the legal status of new hires using E-Verify [DHS backgrounder], a free online federal program that checks names and identification documents to determine employment eligibility. A district court upheld the law [JURIST report] earlier this month after having previously dismissed [PDF text; JURIST report] an earlier lawsuit [complaint, PDF] against the new law filed by the ACLU and other civil rights groups. When Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano signed the legislation [JURIST report] in July, she called the law "the most aggressive action in the country against employers who knowingly or intentionally hire undocumented workers." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Taylor trial key witness in hiding: SCSL chief prosecutor
Katerina Ossenova on February 28, 2008 3:31 PM ET

[JURIST] A key witness in the war crimes trial [JURIST report] of former Liberian President Charles Taylor [SCSL case materials; JURIST news archive] has been moved into hiding after being threatened for testifying before the Special Court for Sierra Leone [official website], chief prosecutor Stephen Rapp said Thursday. Varmuyan Sherif, one of Taylor's former bodyguards, testified in January that Taylor had supplied weapons, cash and gear to militia involved in Sierra Leone's 10-year civil war [BBC backgrounder], which ended in 2002. Other potential witnesses have also received threats, while still others have testified in closed door sessions for fear of retaliation from Taylor's supporters. AP has more.
Also Thursday, Rapp said in an AFP interview [AFP report] that he was close to seizing $600 million of Taylor's assets, thought to have been stolen from the Liberian treasury or obtained from trafficking in blood diamonds. Rapp said he is working with a special team from the British government to ensure that the assets are distributed to victims in Sierra Leone and Liberia. In July 2007, the Liberian government submitted a draft bill [JURIST report] to the country's legislature to authorize the government to seek foreign assistance to track, freeze and confiscate Taylor's funds, properties and assets. Taylor faces eleven charges [indictment, PDF], including murder, rape, and the recruitment and use of child soldiers during the bloody civil war in Sierra Leone [JURIST news archive].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Europe rights court upholds absolute torture ban in Tunisia deportation case
Brett Murphy on February 28, 2008 12:07 PM ET

[JURIST] The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) [official website] on Thursday ruled against the deportation [judgment; press release] of former Tunisian terror suspect Nassim Saadi, finding that evidence provided by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch showed that he would likely be subjected to torture in violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights [PDF text] if returned to Tunisia: 143. In the present case the Court has had regard, firstly, to the reports of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch on Tunisia ... which describe a disturbing situation. The conclusions of those reports are corroborated by the report of the US State Department ... In particular, these reports mention numerous and regular cases of torture and ill-treatment meted out to persons accused under the 2003 Prevention of Terrorism Act. The practices reported - said to be often inflicted on persons in police custody with the aim of extorting confessions - include hanging from the ceiling, threats of rape, administration of electric shocks, immersion of the head in water, beatings and cigarette burns, all of these being practices which undoubtedly reach the level of severity required by Article 3. It is reported that allegations of torture and ill-treatment are not investigated by the competent Tunisian authorities, that they refuse to follow up complaints and that they regularly use confessions obtained under duress to secure convictions ... Bearing in mind the authority and reputation of the authors of these reports, the seriousness of the investigations by means of which they were compiled, the fact that on the points in question their conclusions are consistent with each other and that those conclusions are corroborated in substance by numerous other sources ... the Court does not doubt their reliability. Moreover, the respondent Government have not adduced any evidence or reports capable of rebutting the assertions made in the sources cited by the applicant. ...
146. In these circumstances, the Court considers that in the present case substantial grounds have been shown for believing that there is a real risk that the applicant would be subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention if he were to be deported to Tunisia. ...
148. Furthermore, it should be pointed out that even if, as they did not do in the present case, the Tunisian authorities had given the diplomatic assurances requested by Italy, that would not have absolved the Court from the obligation to examine whether such assurances provided, in their practical application, a sufficient guarantee that the applicant would be protected against the risk of treatment prohibited by the Convention ... The weight to be given to assurances from the receiving State depends, in each case, on the circumstances obtaining at the material time. The court rejected arguments by the Italian government that Saadi posed a serious danger to society, ruling that those concerns did not have any bearing on the risk of torture that Saadi faced if deported from Italy. Amnesty praised the court's decision [press release], saying it would remind states that the ban on torture also extended to deporting people to countries where they would likely face mistreatment.
In July 2007, Amnesty urged the ECHR to dismiss [JURIST report; Amnesty press release] the UK's call for reconsideration of ECHR case law's absolute ban on torture. Saadi was ordered deported to Tunisia by Italy [JURIST news archives] while residing lawfully in Italy and appealing an Italian conviction on charges of criminal conspiracy and forgery. The UK joined the case as a third-party intervener. AP has more. The Guardian has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US-Mexico 'virtual' border fence again delayed
Brett Murphy on February 28, 2008 10:05 AM ET

[JURIST] A 28-mile "virtual fence" [JURIST report] along the US-Mexico border [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], known as Project 28, has been placed on hold due to technical issues, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said during a joint hearing [materials] Wednesday before two subcommittees of the House Committee on Homeland Security [official website]. Richard Stana of the GAO testified [PDF text] that Border Patrol officials have said that Project 28 "is not an optimal system," saying that: Border Patrol agents from the Tucson sector provided examples of Project 28 capabilities that do not adequately support Border Patrol operations because of their design. As noted earlier in this statement, Border Patrol agents have had difficulties using the laptops mounted into agent vehicles to provide them with COP information... Project 28, an early technology project, resulted in a product that did not fully meet user needs and the project's design will not be used as the basis for future SBInet development. The first phase of the project is expected to now be completed in 2011, three years later than originally anticipated.
The US government gave final approval for the "virtual fence" in February as part of the Secured Border Initiative [DHS fact sheet]. Computer software glitches had delayed the testing and use of the fence [AP report] until Boeing, the technology's creator, reportedly fixed the problems [DHS press release] in early December 2007. The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Chad president agrees to international probe into abuse of power allegations
Jaime Jansen on February 28, 2008 8:41 AM ET

[JURIST] Chadian President Idriss Deby [official website, in French; BBC profile] agreed to an international investigation [statement, in French] into allegations of abuse of power during a meeting with French President Nicolas Sarkozy [BBC profile] Wednesday. The decision follows accusations [JURIST report] leveled by Amnesty International [advocacy website] that the government of Chad [JURIST news archive] is using the current state of emergency [JURIST report] to clamp down on journalists and members of peaceful opposition parties. Amnesty said that the government has arrested at least three opposition members [press release] and that some newspapers in Chad have ceased publishing due to potential censorship, with many journalists fleeing the country. During Sarkozy's one-day visit to Chad, Sarkozy also encouraged Deby to pardon six French aid workers convicted in Chad in December of attempting to kidnap [JURIST reports] 103 African children. Deby said earlier in February that he is prepared to pardon the French citizens [JURIST report]. AP has more.
Earlier this month, Deby declared a state of emergency [text, in French] throughout Chad, citing increased violence between government forces and rebels in the capital city of N'Djamena. The order bans most public meetings, imposes a curfew, authorizes government censorship of the press, and allows regional governments to regulate travel. The recent fighting in Chad is the most recent eruption of longstanding hostilities between the Chadian government and several rebel groups seeking to depose Deby. An estimated 20,000 civilians have fled the capital [NYT report] since violence escalated earlier this month. The UN Security Council has condemned the fighting [press release; JURIST report] and urged neighboring countries to help stop the rebel forces.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|