 |
|

Legal news from Monday, February 25, 2008 |
 |
|


Canada MPs join Khadr lawyer in call for Guantanamo repatriation push
Andrew Gilmore on February 25, 2008 6:44 PM ET

[JURIST] Three Canadian opposition MPs and a US military lawyer urged the Canadian government Monday to request the extradition and repatriation of Omar Khadr [DOD materials; JURIST news archive], a Canadian citizen being detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. The three MPs - Joe Comartin (NDP, Windsor-Tecumseh, Ontario), Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal, Beausejour, New Brunswick) and Vivian Barbot (Bloc Quebecois, Papineau, Quebec) - and Khadr US military lawyer Lieutenant Commander Bill Kuebler, held a press conference criticizing the Canadian Conservative Party government for what they called its failure to protect Khadr's rights as a Canadian citizen. The MPs said they would seek an emergency debate in the Canadian House of Commons [Parliament of Canada website] and the establishment of a subcommittee of the Foreign Affairs Committee to focus on the Khadr case. CBC News has more. AFP has additional coverage.
Khadr, now 21, faces life imprisonment for crimes allegedly committed at the age of 15 when he supposedly threw a grenade that killed one US soldier and wounded another while fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan. His military commission trial is currently set for May. Earlier this month, a US military commission heard jurisdiction arguments [JURIST report] in the case. Defense lawyers, a UN official [JURIST reports], and rights groups have said if the US proceeds with the military trial, it will be in violation of the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child [text].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court hears money laundering case
Jeannie Shawl on February 25, 2008 6:25 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in Cuellar v. United States [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], 06-1456, where the Court considered "whether merely hiding funds with no design to create the appearance of legitimate wealth is sufficient to support a money laundering conviction" under 18 USC 1956(a)(2)(B)(i) [text]. The case involves Humberto Cuellar, who was sentenced to over six years in prison for international money laundering. Cuellar's car was pulled over about 100 miles from the Mexico border and police found over $80,000 in cash hidden in the vehicle. Several justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, seemed skeptical that the Cuellar's actions met the requirements of the federal money laundering statute. Cuellar is appealing a decision [PDF text] from the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upholding his conviction. AP has more.
The Court also heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in Warner-Lambert v. Kent [LII case backgrounder; merit briefs], 06-1498, where the Court considered whether federal law preempts a Michigan law that allows personal injury lawsuits against prescription drug manufacturers only when the drug at issue was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration based on the fraudulent submission or withholding of information.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush, Democrats spar over telecom immunity provisions in surveillance bill
Alexis Unkovic on February 25, 2008 2:54 PM ET

[JURIST] US President George W. Bush Monday reiterated his support [transcript] for a surveillance bill that grants immunity for telecommunications companies [JURIST report] from lawsuits related to their participation in the NSA warrantless surveillance program [JURIST news archive]. During a meeting with the National Governors' Association, Bush urged the House of Representatives to allow the measure to go to the floor "for a vote, up or down," adding: We share a responsibility to protect our country. I get briefed every morning about threats we face, and they're real. And therefore the question is, what do you do about them? In my judgment, we have got to give the professionals who work hard to protect us all the tools they need. To put it bluntly, if the enemy is calling to America, we really need to know what they're saying. And we need to know what they're thinking. And we need to know who they're talking to. The Senate passed [JURIST report] the FISA Amendments Act [S 2248 materials] on February 13, but the House did not approve the bill before leaving for a 12-day recess. The version approved by the Senate provides immunity for telecommunications companies, while the House version [HR 3773 materials] of the legislation, approved [JURIST report] in November, does not include the immunity provisions. Last week, Bush urged [JURIST report] Congress to extend the temporary Protect America Act [S 1927 materials; JURIST report], which expired on February 16 without an agreement in Congress on replacement legislation, and said he could foresee "no compromise" with Congressional Democrats on the issue of telecom immunity.
Meanwhile, four democratic lawmakers - US Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV (D-WV), House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Silvestre Reyes (D-TX) [official websites] - authored an op-ed piece [text] published in Monday's Washington Post, in which they criticized Bush's use of "scare tactics and political games" to push for passage of his favored legislation. They wrote:We are already working to reconcile the House and Senate bills and hope that our Republican colleagues will join us in the coming weeks to craft final, bipartisan legislation. A key objective of our effort is to build support for a law that gives our intelligence professionals not only the tools they need but also confidence that the legislation they will be implementing has the broad support of Congress and the American public.
If the president thinks he can use this as a wedge issue to divide Democrats, he is wrong. We are united in our determination to produce responsible legislation that will protect America and protect our Constitution. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court to hear car search, tribal land cases
Jeannie Shawl on February 25, 2008 10:55 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday agreed to hear three cases [Order List, PDF], including Arizona v. Gant (07-542) [docket; cert. petition, PDF] where the Court will consider whether "the Fourth Amendment require[s] law enforcement officers to demonstrate a threat to their safety or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured?" Arizona is appealing an Arizona Supreme Court ruling [PDF text] that Rodney Joseph Gant's constitutional rights were violated when police searched his car after he was handcuffed and seated in a police car. AP has more.
The Court also granted certiorari in Carcieri v. Kempthorne (07-526) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], where the Court will consider whether the US Department of the Interior can take Indian land into federal trust for Indian tribes recognized after the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 took effect. The case involves the Rhode Island Narragansett Tribe, recognized by the federal government in 1983. The tribe asked the federal government to take a 31-acre parcel of land into trust for the tribe, but Rhode Island has argued that the land should be governed by state law. The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled against Rhode Island [text], holding that the Department of the Interior properly gave the land "Indian country" status. In addition to Indian Reorganization Act question, the Court also agreed to consider "Whether an act of Congress that extinguishes aboriginal title and all claims based on Indian rights and interests in land precludes the Secretary from creating Indian country there." AP has more.
Finally, in Chrones v. Pulido (07-544) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court took an appeal from a US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruling [PDF text] to consider whether "the Ninth Circuit fail[ed] to conform to 'clearly established' Supreme Court law ... when it granted habeas corpus relief by deeming an erroneous instruction on one of two alternative theories of guilt to be 'structural error' requiring reversal because the jury might have relied on it[.]" SCOTUSblog has more on all of Monday's cert. grants.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Cuba parliament elects Raul Castro as new president
Joshua Pantesco on February 25, 2008 9:16 AM ET

[JURIST] The Cuban National Assembly on Sunday, by a unanimous show of hands, officially voted Raul Castro [BBC profile], 76, to the position of president, and also chose Jose Ramon Machado Ventura [GlobalSecurity profile], 76, as the first vice president. Ventura is known as a hard-line supporter of former President Fidel Castro, who resigned [JURIST report] last Tuesday, and was a member of the original Cuban Revolution against the Batista government.
United States Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte announced last Tuesday that the United States has no immediate plans to lift the economic sanctions [Guardian report] that have governed its policy toward Cuba for nearly fifty years. In a statement [text] Sunday, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice noted that the US believes that Cubans have an "inalienable right ... to choose their leaders in democratic elections" and said that: We support their aspirations for a better life, and their desire to enjoy the fundamental rights and liberties expressed in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Inter-American Democratic Charter. ...
We urge the Cuban government to begin a process of peaceful, democratic change by releasing all political prisoners, respecting human rights, and creating a clear pathway towards free and fair elections. AP has more. The New York Times has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|