 |
|

Legal news from Friday, January 18, 2008 |
 |
|


Canadian terror suspect gets life sentence for US embassy bomb plot
Steve Czajkowski on January 18, 2008 4:47 PM ET

[JURIST] A US federal judge on Friday sentenced Mohamed Mansour Jabarah [CBC profile] to life in prison for plotting to bomb US embassies in Singapore and the Philippines [criminal information, PDF]. Jabarah, a Canadian citizen of Iraqi descent, pleaded guilty in 2002 to five counts: (1) conspiracy to kill United States nationals; (2) conspiracy to kill United States officers and employees engaged in their official duties; (3) conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction against United States nationals; (4)conspiracy to destroy United States property by means of fire or explosives; and (5) making false statements to FBI agents in connection with a terrorism investigation. According to a press release [PDF text] from the US Attorney Office's for the Southern District of New York:In February 2002, JABARAH was arrested in Oman and deported to Canada. JABARAH voluntarily came to the United States from Canada in May 2002 pursuant to an agreement between JABARAH and this Office whereby JABARAH agreed to surrender to the custody of the FBI with the goal of entering into a cooperation agreement that would require him to plead guilty to criminal charges. As part of this agreement and to effect his travel to the United States, JABARAH executed a parole agreement, which described the understandings between the parties and granted him entry into the United States for the limited purpose of his cooperation. JABARAH was held in New York by the FBI until November 8, 2002, when investigation suggested that JABARAH had secretly disavowed his commitment to cooperate and was, instead, planning to attack federal officials. At that time, JABARAH was transferred into the custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons. Friday's court hearing was the first time Jabarah appeared in public since his 2002 arrest.
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) [official website] played a role in transporting Jabarah to the US and late last year the Security Intelligence Review Committee [official website] sent an oversight report [text] to the Canadian parliament finding that the CSIS violated Jabarah's civil rights [JURIST report]. The committee found that Jabarah was detained without access to counsel and that his confession that he belonged to al Qaeda and plotted to bomb US and Israeli embassies amounted to a violation of his right against self-incrimination under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [text]. CBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Fort Dix plot suspects plead not guilty to attempted murder charges
Eric Firkel on January 18, 2008 4:33 PM ET

[JURIST] The five alleged plotters of an attack on Fort Dix [official website] pleaded not guilty Friday to new charges filed against them, including attempted murder, and received a new date for trial. Prosecutors filed the additional charges [JURIST report] earlier this week. Jury selection is scheduled for September 29, and prosecutors said the trial will probably last four to six weeks. If convicted, the suspects face life sentences.
Last May, federal agents arrested [press release, PDF; JURIST report] Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer, Dritan Duka, Eljvir Duka, Shain Duka, Serdar Tatar, and Agron Abdullahu after 16 months of surveillance for allegedly planning an attack on Fort Dix. In October, Abdullahu pleaded guilty to lesser charges of "conspiring to provide firearms and ammunition" [press release, PDF; JURIST report] to illegal immigrants. Abdullahu, who was granted asylum in the US eight years ago after fleeing Kosovo, will likely face deportation after serving his sentence. Abdullahu's sentencing is scheduled for early February. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US Supreme Court takes Title VII, drug labeling, "light" cigarette cases
Mike Rosen-Molina on January 18, 2008 3:17 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Friday granted certiorari in six cases [order list, PDF], including Crawford v. Nashville and Davidson Cty., TN (06-1595) [docket; cert. petition], in which the Supreme Court will consider whether Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act [text] protects a government employee against being fired for cooperating with an internal sexual harassment probe against a superior. A payroll employee in the Nashville school system was interviewed as part of an investigation into harassment claims against a high-ranking official in the system; she alleges that the official later fired her in retaliation for her statements against him. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed the lawsuit [opinion, PDF], ruling that Title VII protections did not extend to the employee because she was not the originator of the sexual harassment claims being investigated. AP has more.
In Wyeth v. Levine (06-1249) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [official website] approval of a drug's warning label protects its manufacturer from liability when a patient has a bad reaction to the drug that forces her arm to be amputated. The Vermont Supreme Court ruled [opinion] that FDA approval does not shield the maker from liability, because states can require additional warnings above and beyond those required by federal regulations. AP has more.
In Altria Group v. Good (07-562) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act bars state lawsuits based on allegedly deceptive cigarette advertising. A federal judge originally dismissed a suit brought by three Maine smokers who accused Philip Morris of presenting light cigarettes as less harmful than they really are, but the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reinstated the case [ruling]. AP has more.
In MetLife v. Glenn (06-923) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether an employee benefit plan administrator has an illegal conflict of interest under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act [text; US DOL backgrounder] if he has both the authority to pay benefits and to determine employees' eligibility for benefits. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled [PDF text] that the administrator did have a potential conflict of interest.
In Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab. (06-1505) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether a worker or an employer has the burden of proof in an age discrimination case where a worker says he was fired for no valid reason. The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held [PDF text] that the burden of proof rests on the worker.
Finally, in Summers v. Earth Island Institute (07-463) [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the Court will consider whether a group of environmentalists can sue to have a Forest Service regulation struck down or if they are limited only to suing to end programs enacted under that regulation. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held [PDF text] that the environmentalists could sue against the regulation itself. SCOTUSblog has more on all six cases.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

North Korea still violating human rights: UN envoy
Jaime Jansen on January 18, 2008 10:08 AM ET

[JURIST] North Korea [JURIST news archive] has shown no improvement in its human rights record and still systematically tortures its citizens, a UN special rapporteur said Friday. Vitit Muntarbhorn [UN press release] and a special UN envoy visited Japan [press release] this week to assess the impact of the North Korean rights situation on that country. In remarks concluding his visit, Muntarbhorn condemned North Korea's practice of public executions, inhumane prison conditions, and oppression of dissidents. Muntarbhorn will speak with North Korean refugees living in South Korea on Saturday.
Muntarbhorn's comments follow a report in November by the South Korean aid agency Good Friends [advocacy website, in Korean] that the North Korean government has increased the use of public executions [JURIST report]. The government of North Korea has long been accused of using the death penalty against its political enemies, among other human rights violations. In September 2007, the US State Department designated North Korea as a "country of particular concern" for its systematic repression of religious freedom in its annual Report on International Religious Freedom [text; JURIST report]. North Korea has also been accused of human trafficking, press repression, and "actively committing crimes against humanity" [JURIST reports]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Kenya opposition party turns to economic boycott over disputed election
Jaime Jansen on January 18, 2008 8:48 AM ET

[JURIST] Kenya's main opposition party, the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) [party website] said Friday that it would use economic boycotts and strikes to continue protests over the disputed re-election [JURIST report] of Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki [official profile] after ODM supporters clashed with police [JURIST report] during three days of demonstrations staged across the country this week. Opposition spokesman Salime Lone said Friday that planned protests [JURIST report], which ODM called for last week after the African Union failed to facilitate talks between Kibaki and opposition candidate Raila Odinga [campaign profile], would continue, but also announced an economic boycott to focus on companies that support Kibaki. At least 11 protesters have died since the demonstrations began Wednesday, and over 700 people have died since protests began after the election last month. Thirteen nations, including several European Union members and the United States, have threatened to cut off aid to Kenya's government until the crisis is resolved and democracy is restored. Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] has urged the government to ban police from using excessive and lethal force against protesters [press release] and called for peaceful demonstrations.
The controversial presidential vote has sparked simmering ethnic tensions in Kenya [JURIST news archive], where Kibaki has long been accused of using his position to favor members of the Kikuyu tribe. Fueling accusations of malfeasance, Kibaki won the December 27 election despite early opinion polls that placed rival candidate Odinga in the lead. Thousands of opposition supporters took to the streets following the election which prompted the government to temporarily ban public rallies. Earlier this month, Kenyan Attorney General Amos Wako [official profile] called for an independent investigation [JURIST report] into the vote, citing accusations of election fraud. More than two dozen Kenyan civil society groups on Friday collectively claimed widespread election irregularities [Deutsche Welle report] and called for a recount of votes. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

House Oversight Committee schedules hearing on White House e-mail records
Jaime Jansen on January 18, 2008 7:53 AM ET

[JURIST] US House Government Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) [official website] has scheduled a hearing [press release] for mid-February to look into White House compliance with the Presidential Records Act and to investigate the contradiction between comments [press briefing; JURIST report] made Thursday by White House Deputy Press Secretary Fratto that that no electronic messages had been lost between 2003 and 2005 and information congressional staffers heard last September, indicating that no electronic messages had been archived on nearly 500 days in different White House offices. Waxman invited Counsel to the President Fred Fielding, Director of the Office of Administration Alan Swendiman, and Archivist Allen Weinstein [PDF letters] to testify.
Earlier this week, the White House admitted [JURIST report] that it had recycled its back-up computer tapes of e-mails prior to October 2003. In November 2007, US District Court Judge Henry Kennedy ordered [JURIST report] the White House to preserve all of its e-mail records by saving back-up disks after private advocacy group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) [advocacy website] requested a temporary restraining order [JURIST report] to stop deletion. The issue of missing e-mails has been an ongoing controversy in the Bush administration, arising first during the CIA leak investigation into the revelation of Valerie Plame's identity, and again during controversy over the firings of eight US Attorneys [JURIST news archives]. If e-mails were in fact erased, the White House may have violated the Presidential Records Act [text], which requires the preservation of documents that fall into the categories of federal or presidential records. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|