 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, January 12, 2008 |
 |
|


Iraq parliament passes bill allowing reinstatement of ex-Baath party members
Nick Fiske on January 12, 2008 3:24 PM ET

[JURIST] The Iraqi parliament [official website, in Arabic] on Saturday approved a bill that will allow most members of Saddam Hussein's now-defunct Baath Party [BBC backgrounder] to be reinstated to public life. The law, known as the Justice and Accountability Law, was introduced by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani [BBC profile] and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki [BBC profile] last March and was passed unanimously by the 143 Shiite and Sunni lawmakers present during the vote. The law distinguishes between former Baath party officials who have been charged with crimes for their role in the implementation of the party's oppressive policies - still barred from reinstatement - and those members who joined out of necessity and are now free to reapply for positions in the government and military. Under the new law, officials banned from reinstatement will collect pensions.
Iraq set up a DeBaathification Commission [official website] in 2003 with the approval of the US-run Coalition Provisional Authority [official website], and its early agenda was rooting out members of Hussein's Baath party from positions of power in the Iraqi government, prompting the forced removal [JURIST report] of nearly 30,000 Baathists from public life. The Bush administration, however, has urged the Iraqi government to shift the commission from outright prohibition to "accountability and reconciliation" in the interests of countering the growing insurgency in the country. Passage of de-Baathification reform legislation was noted by the White House last year as an as-yet-unmet benchmark [JURIST report] of Iraqi progress towards stability. Iraqi Shiite religious leader Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani previously called the bill "dangerous" [JURIST report] and its ratification process had stalled [JURIST report] as recently as late November. AFP has more. Reuters has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Guantanamo commander reassigned after six-month tenure
Kiely Lewandowski on January 12, 2008 10:15 AM ET

[JURIST] US Navy Rear Adm. Mark H. Buzby [official profile], commander of the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] military prison, was reassigned Friday after only six months at that position. The date of Buzby's departure for the Virginia-based US Fleet Forces Command [official website] has not been publicly released. According to a brief Pentagon statement [official text], Rear Adm. David M. Thomas [official profile] will replace Buzby at the detention center. Buzby assumed command [press release] at Guantanamo in May. Buzby's predecessor, Rear Adm. Harry B. Harris, Jr., became Director of Operations for US Southern Command in June 2007 after a 14-month tenure as Guantanamo commander. Harris' predecessor, Army Maj. Gen. Jay Hood, commanded Joint Task Force Guantanamo for two years, from March 2004 to March 2006. AP has more.
Buzby's departure comes as the number of detainees at Guantanamo continues to decline rapidly. Yemeni nationals now constitute the largest group of prisoners at the camp (almost 100 out of 275); the Yememi detainees cannot be freed due to a diplomatic stalemate between the Yemeni government and Washington. AP Friday quoted a US Defense Department official as saying that the Yemeni government must promise to do more to assure that released detainees do not attack the US or its allies. Yemeni Foreign Minister Abu Bakr al-Kerbi has said in turn that Guantanamo must be closed and that Yemen "does not accept smaller prisons elsewhere." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeal courts rules NASA cannot require background checks of all workers
Dennis Zawacki II on January 12, 2008 10:10 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Friday that NASA [official website] cannot compel low-risk contract employees working at its Jet Propulsion Laboratory [official website] to undergo intensive background checks. NASA has been conducting background checks of employees since it was founded in 1958, but contract employees were only included after the agency revised its Security Program Procedural Requirements [official backgrounder] in 2006. NASA argued that contract employees were added to the list of workers who had to undergo background checks in compliance with Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 [White House press release], the Federal Information Security Management Act [text, PDF], and the Space Act [text].
In balancing the interests of NASA and the employees facing the background checks, Judge Kim Wardlaw, writing for the court, held that The balance of hardships tips sharply toward Appellants, who face a stark choiceeither violation of their constitutional rights or loss of their jobs. The district court [in this case] erroneously concluded that Appellants will not suffer any irreparable harm because they could be retroactively compensated for any temporary denial of employment. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|