 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, November 25, 2007 |
 |
|


New Poland PM pledges to opt out of EU rights charter
Benjamin Klein on November 25, 2007 4:21 PM ET

[JURIST] New Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk [BBC profile] has told the Polish Parliament [official website] that his government will refuse to sign the European Charter of Fundamental Rights [European Parliament materials], part of the new EU Reform Treaty [JURIST news archive]. Tusk said the decision, which follows a similar statement made earlier this month [JURIST report] by the country's foreign minister, was taken out of respect for a deal negotiated by the previous conservative government led by Jaroslaw Kaczynski, who expressed concern over the charter's supposed liberal stance on "moral issues." The opt-out would remain, according to the Prime Minister, because he needed the support of the Kaczynski's Law and Justice Party [party website, in Polish] in order to reach the two-thirds parliamentary majority required to ratify the Reform Treaty as a whole. The United Kingdom has also said it will opt out [Sky report] of the new pan-European rights charter.
The Reform Treaty, essentially a cut-down version of the stalled European constitution [JURIST news archive], has generated much debate among EU members. EU leaders only reached agreement on the final text of the treaty [JURIST report] at a summit in Lisbon last month, working through last minute objections by Poland and Italy. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rwanda genocide tribunal to miss 2008 trials completion deadline: spokesman
Benjamin Klein on November 25, 2007 3:24 PM ET

[JURIST] The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) [official website] has officially indicated that it will be unable to complete its work before the expiration of its December 2008 mandate. ICTR spokesman Roland Amoussouga made the announcement at a press conference Saturday during the second day of the Commonwealth summit in Uganda, saying that there would be "at least one case" left unfinished at the scheduled closure of the tribunal. The formal completion strategy for the UN-backed Rwanda genocide court, as outlined in UN Resolutions 1503 and 1534 [PDF texts], calls for the closure of all investigations by 2004, trials by 2008 and appeals by 2010. Rather than extending its timeframe, Amoussouga and other ICTR officials have insisted that the Tribunal will adhere to its original mandate and transfer backlogged cases to Rwandan national jurisdiction.
As of June 2007, the Office of the Prosecutor for the ICTR intended to refer 15 cases from the Tribunal to Rwandan jurisdiction, including three detainees and 12 fugitives. That month, Prosecutor Hassan Jallow [ICTR profile] requested the first transfer [press release] of an ICTR case that of Fulgence Kayishema to Rwandan national jurisdiction. That transfer request, which is still pending decision, is opposed by Amnesty International [JURIST report], which petitioned the ICTR [press release] earlier this month to prevent it from extraditing suspects to Rwanda due to fairness and victim and witness protection concerns. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraq parliament undertakes raucous first reading of de-Baathification reform bill
Alexis Unkovic on November 25, 2007 11:01 AM ET

[JURIST] The Iraqi parliament Sunday conducted a preliminary reading of a proposed law [JURIST report] that would allow former Baath Party [party website, in Arabic; BBC backgrounder] members not convicted of any crimes to return to their previously held government positions, participate in the political process, and serve in the civil and military service. Hardline Shiite lawmakers allied with cleric Moqtada al-Sadr noisily rejected the law, however, deriding it as unconstitutional. Legislators originally introduced the Justice and Accountability Law in March, and it had been scheduled for a vote before the Iraqi National Assembly [official website] Wednesday following an additional reading, although it is not now clear if that will still take place. The White House's most recent Benchmark Assessment Report [PDF text; JURIST report] in September found satisfactory progress on reforming the de-Baathification process in Iraq, while conceding little progress had been made by the Iraqi government toward accomplishing the rest of the 18 "benchmarks" thought to be essential to Iraq's stability. Reuters has more. AFP has additional coverage and an update.
Supporters of the draft measure are looking for a way to reinstate [JURIST report] former Baath party members who say they joined the party for professional reasons; Hussein only allowed university enrollment, career progression and specialized medical aid to those who were members of his party. Despite provisions in the proposal that would prevent reemployment of former Baathists who have been charged with, or are sought for, criminal activities, several Shiite leaders oppose the draft law [JURIST report] as a "dangerous" undertaking to return former regime members - many of the Sunnis - to leadership positions in the government. Without approval by Shiite religious leaders, the proposed law has little chance of being passed by the Iraqi National Assembly since Shiites currently hold the majority of the parliamentary seats and often vote according to the advice of their religious leaders. Some Kurds, who were also suppressed by Hussein's Baathist regime, oppose the draft law as well.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Judge stays challenge to new illegal immigrant employment rules pending revision
Alexis Unkovic on November 25, 2007 10:03 AM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Charles R. Breyer of the Northern District of California Friday stayed [order text, PDF] until March 24 a challenge to the implementation of new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) [official website] regulations [PDF text] intended to make it more difficult for illegal immigrants to obtain US employment. Breyer granted a government motion [PDF text] seeking to halt the court proceedings while DHS revises and rewrites the regulations. Breyer granted a preliminary injunction [PDF text; JURIST report] against implementation of the regulations on October 10 after finding that there was an immediate threat of harm to the plaintiffs, a coalition of labor and business groups, that would result from the application of the new rules, which warranted blocking DHS from implementing the rules until the case has been decided. The stricter rules, announced [JURIST report; DHS transcript] in August and originally slated to take effect in September, require employers who receive notices from the Social Security Administration (SSA) [official website] informing them of non-matching records between an employee's name and Social Security number to resolve any discrepancy within 90 days, dismiss the employee, or face up to $10,000 in fines for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants.
The lawsuit [ACLU materials] challenging the new regulations, brought by employers, unions, and the American Civil Liberties Union [advocacy website], argues that errors in the SSA's database may cause legally employed persons to lose their jobs and that the rules impose a substantial burden on employers. In August, US District Judge Maxine M. Chesney said that the lawsuit highlighted the fact that there was "serious question" about whether DHS overreached in making the rules, and directed the SSA not to send out a mailing to approximately 140,000 employers advising them that there were discrepancies in their particular employment records. The ACLU issued a statement [press release, text] Saturday arguing that revised DHS rules which still rely on an allegedly flawed SSA database will pose additional concerns. AP has more. The New York Times has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|