 |
|

Legal news from Monday, November 12, 2007 |
 |
|


Commonwealth threatens to suspend Pakistan over emergency decree
Mike Rosen-Molina on November 12, 2007 9:00 PM ET

[JURIST] The Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) [official website] has threatened [statement] to suspend Pakistan from the Commonwealth if it does not end emergency rule by November 22. The group also called on Pakistan to release all detainees, restore the constitution and the independence of the judiciary, and have Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf [official website; BBC profile] resign as army chief by the same deadline. The Commonwealth ministers and ambassadors voiced grave concern at the dismissal of the Chief Justice and several other judges and their placement under house arrest, which it deemed to constitute a serious breach of the Harare Commonwealth principle of independence of the judiciary and the Commonwealth Latimer House Principles. [The CMAG] took the view that other actions taken against lawyers, opposition politicians and civil society leaders, and the suspension of all private media broadcasts and restrictions on the press also constitute violations against Commonwealth fundamental values of freedom of expression and human rights. It noted with alarm the recent amendment to the Army Act, which retrospectively gives military courts the right to try civilians on charges of anti-national activities and believed this to be a further derogation of constitutionality and rule of law. Musharraf said Sunday that Pakistan would hold anticipated parliamentary elections before January 9, but set no time limit to the emergency rule [JURIST report] he declared a week ago. A variety of international critics have already expressed dismay [JURIST report] at the government's dismissal of top judges, its detention of hundreds of lawyers and opposition activists, and its restriction of independent television programming. CBC has more.
The Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group was established by Commonwealth Heads of Government in November 1995 to deal with serious or persistent violations of the Harare Declaration [text], which lays down the fundamental political values of the Commonwealth, formerly the British Commonwealth of Nations. The Commonwealth Latimer House Principles on the Three Branches of Government [PDF text] set out the relationship between parliament, the judiciary and the executive in Commonwealth member countries.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Japan parliament panel backs limited anti-terror bill
Mike Rosen-Molina on November 12, 2007 7:28 PM ET

[JURIST] A Japanese parliamentary committee Monday approved a controversial anti-terror bill re-authorizing Japan's support mission for US operations in the Indian Ocean. Under the bill, Japanese ships will be barred from refueling US ships involved in combat or humanitarian operations in Afghanistan, but will be allowed to refuel ships involved in anti-terrorism or anti-smuggling patrols. The bill is intended as a compromise between Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DJP) [party websites], and, if approved, would replace the Anti-Terrorism Special Measures Law [text], which expired on November 1. The LDP previously sought a full renewal of the anti-terror law, but narrowed the scope [JURIST reports] of the legislation to obtain greater DJP support. The full lower house is expected to vote on the bill Tuesday.
Japan's involvement in Operation Enduring Freedom [DOS backgrounder] by refueling and supplying water to coalition ships in the Indian Ocean has precipitated a major rift [JURIST report] between Japan's two major parties, contributing to the September resignation [BBC English translation; JURIST report] of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. The DJP wishes to entirely scrap Japan's mission, saying it violates the country's pacifist constitution [text] by involving Japan in military operations. AP has more. The Japan Times has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge orders White House to preserve e-mails
Leslie Schulman on November 12, 2007 6:12 PM ET

[JURIST] The White House must preserve all of its e-mail records by saving back-up disks, United States District Court Judge Henry Kennedy ordered [PDF text; press release] Monday. The order was a blow to the Bush administration, which has been fighting lawsuits brought by private advocacy groups Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the National Security Archives [advocacy websites] against the Executive Office of the President [official website]. CREW requested the temporary restraining order [press release; JURIST report] last month. Kennedy ordered the White House to preserve media, no matter how described, presently in [its] possess or under [its] custody or control, that were created with the intention of preserving data in the event of its inadvertent destruction. Defendants shall preserve the media under conditions that will permit their eventual use, if necessary, and shall not transfer said media out of their custody or control without leave of this court. The lawsuit arose from millions of e-mails that have been deleted from White House servers and now only exist on back-up tapes, if they exist at all.
Thus far, the White House has refused to confirm that they have maintained e-mail records since the beginning of the Bush administration, as they are required to do, according to CREW executive director Melanie Sloan [CREW profile]. The US Department of Justice has been unresponsive about what back-up tapes the White House possesses, although it has said that the White House has maintained all back-up tapes since CREW filed suit. The issue of missing e-mails has been an ongoing controversy in the Bush administration, arising first during the CIA leak investigation [JURIST news archive], and again this year during controversy over the firings of eight US Attorneys [JURIST news archive]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Indonesia lawyers fail to reach settlement in civil land fraud suit against Suharto son
Leslie Schulman on November 12, 2007 3:05 PM ET

[JURIST] Indonesian prosecutors on Monday announced the breakdown of court-ordered settlement negotiations with lawyers representing Tommy Suharto [BBC report], son of former President Haji Mohammad Suharto [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. Indonesian law requires that parties try mediation to resolve civil disputes before courts may proceed with a case, but prosecutors will now go ahead with court proceedings in the government's civil lawsuit, which was filed [AFP report] in August. The charges relate to a scam where Goro Batara Sakti (GBS), a company in which Tommy Suharto served as president and commissioner, traded low value swampland to the state national logistics agency Bulog in return for high value real estate in Jakarta. The plot bilked the state out of approximately 95.4 billion rupiah, valued at $781,612 at the time. Government lawyers are seeking to recover $1.5 million in appropriated funds and damages.
The lawsuit is the latest of several suits brought against Tommy Suharto and his father. In May, prosecutors reopened a corruption probe [JURIST report] into Tommy Suharto's involvement in a Suharto-owned car company's monopoly to build a national car, in which Tommy allegedly earned over $159 million. Last October, Tommy Suharto was released from prison by court order [JURIST report] after serving a 10-year sentence for hiring a hitman to kill a judge [BBC report] who had found him guilty in an earlier corruption case. In September, Indonesian prosecutors began court proceedings [JURIST report] against the elder Suharto in a civil action alleging that he embezzled $440 million from the Yayasan Supersemar, a state-funded scholarship fund, between 1974 and 1998. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

DOJ civil rights division stepping up enforcement of 'Motor Voter Act'
Lauren Becker on November 12, 2007 2:23 PM ET

[JURIST] The Civil Rights Division [official website] of the US Department of Justice is stepping up its enforcement of the 1993 National Voter Registration Act [official backgrounder], according to a report from McClatchy Newspapers. The law, commonly known as the "Motor Voter Act," is designed to make it easier for Americans to register to vote and to maintain their registration. It targets registration of low income and disabled people, many of whom are minorities, and requires all public-assistance agencies to offer voter registration services. The division sent letters in August requiring 18 states to provide evidence of proof of compliance with the Act, an effort which was partly in response to criticism of department policies that allegedly discourage votes of minorities, particularly African-Americans, who are likely to vote Democrat. Justice Department spokeswoman Jodi Bobb told McClatchy Newspapers that the Department has always protected African-American voter rights and accusations to the contrary are "false." The DOJ has filed lawsuits [DOJ materials] dating back to 1994 against states that fail to comply with the Act's requirements.
The new emphasis by the DOJ is partially in response to criticisms earlier this year that the Department had become politicized, as with the dismissal of several US attorneys [JURIST report]. New Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey [WH profile, JURIST news archive] has promised not to allow partisan politics to interfere with the DOJ's law enforcement decisions. The Civil Rights Division has also come under scrutiny in recent months for what some say is a shift in the department's focus. The New York Times reported in June that the Bush administration has focused on investigating issues of religious freedom and discrimination [JURIST report] at the expense of race. Earlier this year the Justice Department unveiled a new religious discrimination education initiative [JURIST report], and noted that the Civil Rights Division has "dramatically increased enforcement" of religious discrimination laws [DOJ report] between 2001 and 2006. McClatchy Newspapers has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US Coast Guard begins criminal investigation into California oil spill
Brett Murphy on November 12, 2007 12:37 PM ET

[JURIST] The crew of the Cosco Busan, which leaked some 58,000 gallons of fuel oil into the San Fransisco Bay [IndyBay report] after colliding with a bridge last week, is being held for questioning by federal investigators as a criminal investigation into the oil spill begins, the US Coast Guard [official website] said Sunday. Coast Guard Captain William Uberti said that a preliminary Coast Guard investigation indicated that the ship crashed into the Bay Bridge due to human error, possibly because of communications and management problems among the crew members [AP report]. An independent probe by the National Transportation Safety Board [official website], which began work Sunday, will also investigate the incident.
The Cosco Busan crashed [Chronicle report] into the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge last Wednesday, cutting a 100-foot gash into the side of the ship. The Coast Guard noted that there was heavy fog at the time, but some, including US Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) [official website], say that weather cannot excuse the accident. The Coast Guard has been criticized for its delayed response, but Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Thad Allen has promised a thorough investigation into the incident. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

'Chemical Ali' transfer for execution will wait until legal questions answered: US
Brett Murphy on November 12, 2007 12:14 PM ET

[JURIST] Ali Hassan al-Majid [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], better known in Western media as "Chemical Ali," will not be transferred to Iraqi custody for execution until a legal debate on the executions is resolved, the US embassy in Iraq said Monday. US spokeswoman Mirembe Nantongo said that there are unresolved questions about the legal and procedural requirements for executions ordered by the Iraqi High Tribunal, and until such questions are answered, al-Majid and two other defendants will remain in the custody of the coalition forces. The remarks come as a response to comments made by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki [BBC profile] on Sunday accusing the US military of thwarting Iraqi attempts to execute al-Majid [JURIST report]. AFP has more.
The Iraqi High Tribunal sentenced [JURIST report] al-Majid to death in June on genocide and war crimes charges. The Tribunal's Appeals Chamber upheld the death sentence [JURIST report] in September. Iraq's Presidency Council, including Kurdish President Jalal Talibani, Shi'ite Vice-President Adel Abdul-Mahdi, and Sunni Vice-President Tareq al-Hashemi, have nonetheless refused to sign any execution order [JURIST report]. An Iraqi judge said in September that presidential approval is not required [JURIST report] to carry out an execution for al-Majid and his co-defendants, but al-Hashemi reasserted in October that the presidency did in fact have the power to block the carrying out of the death sentences [AP report], regardless of their approval by al-Maliki.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Cambodia ex-officials arrested on Khmer Rouge war crimes charges
Katerina Ossenova on November 12, 2007 9:20 AM ET

[JURIST] Former Cambodian Foreign Minister Ieng Sary and his wife Ieng Thirith were arrested Monday and brought before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) [official website; JURIST news archive]. Ieng Sary and his wife, who served as Minister for Social Affairs, have been charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Khmer Rouge regime. Sary and Thirith were two of five former Khmer Rouge leaders under investigation and their arrests were widely anticipated. Sary is suspected of perpetrating and facilitating murders as well as coordinating Khmer Rouge's policies of forcible transfer, forced labor and unlawful killings. Thirith allegedly directed and planned widespread purges and the killings of members within the Ministry of Social Affairs. Sary and Thirith are schedule to appear before the before the UN-backed genocide tribunal on Wednesday.
The ECCC was established by a 2001 law [text as amended 2004, PDF] to investigate and try surviving Khmer Rouge officials. The Khmer Rouge is generally held responsible for the genocide of an estimated 1.7 million Cambodians [PPU backgrounder] who died between 1975 and 1979. To date, no top Khmer Rouge officials have faced trial. In August, the ECCC brought its first charges against Kaing Khek Iev [TrialWatch profile; JURIST report], better known as "Duch", who was in charge of the notorious S-21 prison in Phnom Penh. Former Khmer Rouge official Nuon Chea [GenocideWatch report] is awaiting trial [JURIST report] for charges [statement, PDF] of war crimes and crimes against humanity. AP has more. BBC News has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Former Bosnian Croat soldier transferred to Sweden to finish ICTY sentence
Jaime Jansen on November 12, 2007 8:32 AM ET

[JURIST] The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website] has transferred former Bosnian Croat soldier Miroslav Bralo [ICTY case backgrounder] to Sweden to serve the remainder of his 20-year prison sentence, DPA reported Monday. Christer Isaksson, head of security for the Swedish Prison and Probation Service [official website], told DPA that Bralo had been transferred to Sweden several days ago, but he declined to say which prison is holding Bralo. He was sentenced in 2005 to 20 years' imprisonment after pleading guilty [JURIST reports] to murder, rape and torture charges stemming from the 1993 Bosnian war [Wikipedia backgrounder].
Bralo initially pleaded not guilty [JURIST report], but later changed his plea [plea agreement, PDF]. ICTY Judge Iain Bonomy [UN profile] said this move, along with Bralo's remorse and voluntary surrender to the war crimes tribunal, served as a mitigating factor reducing Bralo's sentence from a possible 25 years. Bralo belonged to a special Bosnian Croat force known as the Jokers that attacked Muslim villages in central Bosnia during the 1993 conflict and subsequently imprisoned and tortured civilians. The Appeals Chamber of the ICTY upheld [JURIST report] Bralo's 20-year prison sentence in May, dismissing his arguments that the trial chamber failed to consider relevant facts. DPA has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|