 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, September 13, 2007 |
 |
|


Canada electoral chief resists political push to bar face-covered Muslim women from polls
Alexis Unkovic on September 13, 2007 4:07 PM ET

[JURIST] Canadian chief electoral officer Marc Mayrand [official profile] Thursday resisted calls by Canadian lawmakers to invoke his discretionary powers, reserved for exceptional circumstances, to require women to remove traditional Muslim niqabs or burqas [JURIST news archives] when they vote in by-elections in the province of Quebec on Monday. Mayrand said in testimony [recorded video] before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs [official website] that his position allowing them to vote accords with the recently passed Bill C-31 [text] on voting procedures, cited by many MPs as an effort to require voters to show their faces. Elections Canada [official website], an independent body that oversees national elections, announced September 6 that Muslim women will be allowed to wear [press release] veils and burqas and will not be required to show their faces [JURIST report] to vote so long as they are able to sufficiently prove their identity with photo IDs or other documentation. During his testimony Thursday, Mayrand sparred with MPs who claimed he was going against the will of the legislature, insisting that a bar "would be a request for me to amend the Act, not uphold the law" and maintaining that it is not his prerogative to "juggle" fundamental constitutional rights.
Earlier this week, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper [official profile] voiced his disapproval [JURIST report] of the administrative decision allowing women to wear traditional Muslim face-covering garb while voting. CBC News has more. The Globe & Mail has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Kenya lawmakers limit corruption investigations
Gabriel Haboubi on September 13, 2007 2:47 PM ET

[JURIST] Kenyan lawmakers have approved a bill limiting the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (KACC) [official website] to investigating crimes committed after 2003. The amendment, deleting portions of the 2003 Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act [text], will make it impossible for the commission to continue investigations into some of the country's most notorious corruption cases [JURIST report], involving millions of dollars in a state where most citizens live on less than a dollar a day. One investigation which will be forced to end is the probe of the $1 billion scam known as the Goldenberg Affair [BBC report; Wikipedia backgrounder]. Four senior Kenyan officials and a top businessman were charged for their roles in the case [JURIST report] last year.
Kenyan Justice Minister Martha Karua [Wikipedia profile], who argued against the amendment, called the move a "deadly blow" to the KACC, pointing out that many past economic crimes remained to be investigated. Karua also noted that the lawmaker who proposed the amendment, Paul Muite, was allegedly connected to the Goldenberg scandal. She described Muite's interest in the KACC as "obvious", and his amendment "mischievous". BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Moscow court rules new Khodorkovsky probe illegal
Gabriel Haboubi on September 13, 2007 2:08 PM ET

[JURIST] A Russian court Thursday upheld a ruling that a new investigation into former Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky [advocacy website; JURIST news archive] and his partner Platon Lebedev [advocacy website] was illegal. The Moscow City Court supported Moscow's Basmanny Court ban on an investigation in Chita into new charges [JURIST report] against the former Yukos Oil [corporate website] executives, which included stealing government shares, expropriating oil, and laundering over $25 billion. Lawyers for the men repeated previous calls that the men should be transferred from the Siberian penal colony in Chita Oblast [Wikipedia backgrounder] to Moscow, a call which Russian prosecutors have ignored [JURIST report], despite a March court order [JURIST report] that was upheld [JURIST report] in April.
Khodorkovsky was convicted of tax evasion [JURIST report] in May 2005, and is currently serving an eight-year prison term. The additional charges, filed against him in February 2007, are based on allegations that Khodorkovsky used his Open Russia Foundation [SourceWatch backgrounder] to divert oil revenues away from Yukos. If convicted on the new charges, Khodorkovsky faces an additional 15 years in prison. Both the United States and Khodorkovsky [JURIST reports] believe the new charges to be politically motivated, a claim which Russia has denied [JURIST report]. RIA Novosti has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US sex offender laws 'may do more harm than good': HRW
Joshua Pantesco on September 13, 2007 12:33 PM ET

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] concluded in a report [text] released [press release] Thursday that is unclear whether sex offender laws "do more harm or good," noting that they prevent further harm to children but that they also encourage the harassment and ostracism of sex offenders. The report criticized registration laws as unsuitable for offenders who pose no safety risk, and said that community notification laws often lead to harassment of former sex offenders without increasing neighborhood safety. In other circumstances, residency restrictions, such as protective covenants on housing units and distance restrictions from schools and hospital campuses, "have the effect of banishing registrants from entire urban areas and forcing them to live far from their homes and families."
HRW interviewed victims, offenders, law enforcement and governmental officials, and others over a two-year period leading up to the report. The report cites studies indicating that three-quarters of sex offenders do not repeat their crimes, and that, in some case, even serious sex offenders can be receptive to treatment. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraq oil bill negotiations failing: NYT
Joshua Pantesco on September 13, 2007 11:30 AM ET

[JURIST] Negotiations have collapsed in Iraq over a controversial oil bill [JURIST news archive] that would govern the distribution and refinement process and give the national government control over oil revenue, the New York Times reported Thursday. The bill, which the Iraqi cabinet approved [JURIST report] in February, is now in jeopardy due to a conflict between the Iraqi oil minister and officials from the Kurdish north, where most Iraqi oil is located. In recent weeks, Kurdish officials have signed oil contracts with foreign companies even though the federal oil law is not in place, prompting others to doubt Kurdish commitment to following the federal law. Kurds have proceeded to sign contracts pursuant to their own regional oil law, which they say is constitutional under Article 112 of the Iraqi Constitution [constitution text]; according to that article, regional law preempts federal law when a conflict arises between the two. Kurdish officials also say their regional law is constitutional under Article 109, which decrees that "oil and gas is the property of all the Iraqi people in all the regions and governorates." The New York Times has more.
The oil law is one of 18 benchmarks established by the US Congress to measure US success in the Iraq mission. Several recent reports, including the White House's Initial Benchmark Assessment Report [text; JURIST report] and a report [text, PDF; summary] released in September by the US Government Accountability Office, conclude that the Iraqi Government has not met most of the legislative, security, and economic benchmarks. In March, associates of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki [BBC profile] said passage of the draft law is key to continued US support [JURIST report] of the current government.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal sex offender commitment law ruled unconstitutional
Joshua Pantesco on September 13, 2007 9:28 AM ET

[JURIST] A federal law allowing prison officials to indefinitely commit sex offenders to a mental hospital following their prison term is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, effectively freeing five convicted sex offenders pending the government's filing of a motion to stay the order. Senior US District Court Judge Earl Britt [official profile] of the US Eastern District of North Carolina [official website] struck down the section of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 [text] allowing prosecutors to request that a sex offender be committed to a mental hospital upon "clear and convincing evidence" that the person is "sexually dangerous" and thus likely to commit the crime in the future. Britt ruled that Congress does not have the power to influence outcomes of criminal proceedings that fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of state courts.
In 1997, the Supreme Court in Kansas v. Hendricks [text] upheld a state civil commitment process as constitutional. The Kansas statute at issue allowed the state to confine, in a state mental hospital, sexually violent criminal offenders who are found to have a "mental abnormality" that poses a danger to others, even if their condition does not qualify as a "mental illness." The Court held, inter alia, that the Kansas statute did not violate the Double Jeopardy clause because the confinement was civil in nature and thus did not involve criminal punishment. As of 2006, at least 17 states and the District of Columbia had civil commitment statutes [press release]. AP has more. The News & Observer has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|