 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, August 22, 2007 |
 |
|


Egypt arrests two Muslim Brotherhood lawmakers
Jeannie Shawl on August 22, 2007 10:06 PM ET

[JURIST] Egyptian officials on Wednesday arrested two lawmakers from the Muslim Brotherhood [party website; FAS backgrounder] in order to question them in a case involving "other Brotherhood members," according to a police official speaking anonymously. The Brotherhood, banned from officially participating in Egyptian politics, denounced the "arbitrary" arrests [statement]: The MB Bloc sees the detention of both MPs as a part of the ongoing security escalation practiced by the Egyptian regime against the Muslim Brotherhood....
The People's Assembly approved in its session on [May 9, 2007] lifting immunity on both MPs to take criminal procedures against them. However, no action was taken against them and they haven't been subpoenaed since then. This confirms that today's detentions are, legally speaking, arbitrary actions against two public figures, and that raiding their houses and their offices confirm that there is a specific message and a target from these actions. The message and target are humiliating MPs and exploiting the prosecution as a tool in the hands of the regime to to settle scores with opposition. When parliament voted [JURIST report] to strip lawmakers Sabri Amer and Ragab Abu Zaid of their immunity in May, Zeid labeled the decision a government-orchestrated attempt to intimidate the Brotherhood. Under Egyptian law, legislators enjoy immunity from prosecution unless the parliament votes to remove it.
The Brotherhood has been banned since 1954, but its members run as independents and the organization has grown into Egypt's most powerful opposition movement with 88 seats in the 454-seat parliament. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK Defence Ministry withholding Iraqi detainee abuse evidence: lawyers
Mike Rosen-Molina on August 22, 2007 3:11 PM ET

[JURIST] The UK Ministry of Defence [official website] has refused to release key evidence about the abuse of Iraqi detainees held by British security forces, lawyers representing the detainees' families said Tuesday. The lawyers have requested that the UK High Court to issue a new order to compel the ministry to hand over documents about 11 Iraqi detainees, including Baha Mousa [BBC report; JURIST report], a Basra hotel receptionist who died while in British custody in 2003. Evidence of abuse first surfaced during a court-martial [JURIST report] in March against seven soldiers involved in the Basra incident. The information the lawyers are seeking concerns the legal advice provided to soldiers on permissible interrogation techniques. The Guardian has more.
In 2003, British military took part in a raid on a hotel in Basra, confiscating weapons and detaining several Iraqi civilians, including Mousa. The soldiers allegedly took the Iraqis to a detention facility where they were held for 36 hours and subjected to physical abuse, causing Mousa's death. Charges were dropped against seven British soldiers [BBC trial timeline] accused of causing Mousa's death, while a military panel cleared Major Michael Peebles and Warrant Officer Mark Davies of negligently performing their duties. Charges against Lieutenant Colonel Jorge Mendonca [JURIST report] and four other soldiers were dropped [BBC report] in February, and in 2006, Corporal David Payne pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to a charge of inhumane treatment.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Texas governor rejects EU request to end use of death penalty
Mike Rosen-Molina on August 22, 2007 1:58 PM ET

[JURIST] Texas Gov. Rick Perry [official website] Wednesday rejected a call by the European Union to halt all executions in the state [EU statement; JURIST report]. In a statement [text], a spokesman for the governor said: 230 years ago, our forefathers fought a war to throw off the yoke of a European monarch and gain the freedom of self-determination. Texans long ago decided that the death penalty is a just and appropriate punishment for the most horrible crimes committed against our citizens. While we respect our friends in Europe, welcome their investment in our state and appreciate their interest in our laws, Texans are doing just fine governing Texas. In its own statement earlier this week, the European Union urged Texas to put a moratorium on capital punishment [JURIST news archive], describing it as "cruel and inhumane" and arguing that there was no evidence that it deterred violent crime.
The EU's plea came ahead of Texas's planned execution of Johnny Ray Conner [CCADP profile] on Wednesday, which will bring Texas state executions to a total of 400 since the US Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976. Collectively, the US has executed more than 1,000 people since then, with Texas leading the nation in total numbers. Nearly 400 prisoners are currently on death row in Texas [TDCJ materials]. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Sudan ends legal immunity for police officers accused of crimes
Mike Rosen-Molina on August 22, 2007 12:08 PM ET

[JURIST] Sudan [JURIST news archive] has issued a decree abolishing legal immunities that protect police from criminal prosecution, the Sudanese government said Tuesday. The decree, issued by the police director general, allows police officers to be tried for crimes but also guarantees quick legal proceedings.
UN rights experts have long criticized Sudan for giving blanket immunity to police and army officers, a policy that rights groups say has allowed rapes, kidnappings and murders perpetrated by government-aligned militias in Darfur [JURIST news archive] and elsewhere in the country to go unpunished. In July, the Sudanese government defended its handling of military and police personnel allegedly involved in human rights abuses [JURIST report] in Darfur before the UN Human Rights Committee [official website], denying allegations that the government was collaborating with armed militias that have committed some of the worst atrocities against civilians while insisting that the Sudanese judiciary is capable of handling allegations of murder, torture, and rape. Sudanese officials also defended a proposed Darfur peace accord [JURIST report] which contains an amnesty agreement, saying that the amnesty does not grant immunity from war crimes as they are defined by international conventions. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|