 |
|

Legal news from Friday, July 6, 2007 |
 |
|


Congressman seeks Supreme Court ruling on illegally recorded tape case
Mike Rosen-Molina on July 6, 2007 6:14 PM ET

[JURIST] Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash) [official website] announced Friday he will ask the US Supreme Court [official website] to rule on whether he had a First Amendment right to turn over an illegally taped telephone call conversation to the media that involved House Republican leaders. In 1996, McDermott leaked a recorded telephone conversation in which several Republican lawmakers discussed ethics allegations against then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) [personal website] to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the New York Times, which published stories on the case in January 1997. The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled [PDF opinion] that McDermott had no First Amendment right to turn over the taped telephone call to reporters. The court found his actions particularly problematic because McDermott was serving on the House Ethics Committee [official website] at the time. McDermott Friday criticized the court's ruling as an infringement of his First Amendment rights, and said that "the protections afforded all Americans by the First Amendment have been placed on a very slippery slope by this (appeals court) decision."
McDermott was previously found liable [PDF opinion; JURIST report] of violating 18 USC 2511(1)(c) [text] by a three-judge panel, but in June the court granted his petition for an en banc rehearing in front of the entire nine-judge panel. Lawyers for ABC, NBC, CBS, the Associated Press, Time, Newsweek, and the Washington Post among others filed an amicus curiae brief [PDF] on behalf of McDermott, arguing that the First Amendment protects him and that he should not incur liability for merely receiving tapes obtained by other parties. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Taylor allocated $100,000 monthly for defense against war crimes charges
Gabriel Haboubi on July 6, 2007 4:47 PM ET

[JURIST] The Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) [official website; JURIST news archive] has increased to approximately $100,000 a month the funds available for former Liberian president Charles Taylor [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] to defend himself in his ongoing war crimes trial. The allocation includes money for a legal team and an investigator, as well as office space in The Hague, Sierra Leone, and Liberia. Despite a UN report that concluded Taylor may be in control of millions of dollars [JURIST report] held in bank accounts worldwide, the court has ruled Taylor to be an indigent defendant, guaranteeing him free counsel.
If investigators can concretely link funds to Taylor, he can be forced to repay the court for defense costs. Charges against Taylor include murder, rape, and the recruitment and use of child soldiers during a blood civil war in Sierra Leone [JURIST news archive]. If acquitted, Taylor will be permitted to return to Liberia; if convicted, he will serve his jail time in Britain [JURIST report]. The trial, which was expected to last 18 months, was relocated to The Hague from Sierra Leone [JURIST report] for security reasons in 2006. Currently delayed [JURIST report] to give the new defense team more time to prepare, the trial is set to resume on August 20. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Military prosecutors file appeal against dismissal of Khadr charges
Mike Rosen-Molina on July 6, 2007 4:45 PM ET

[JURIST] US military prosecutors have filed an appeal against a military judge's decision to dismiss charges against Guantanamo detainee Omar Ahmed Khadr [TrialWatch profile; JURIST news archive], according to the Department of Defense (DOD) Friday. In late June, Judge Peter E. Brownback III reiterated his earlier ruling [order, PDF] dismissing charges against Khadr on grounds that the Combatant Status Review Tribunal [DOD materials] that reviewed Khadr's status had not found him to be an "unlawful enemy combatant" [JURIST report] as required under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [PDF text]. Prosecutors argue that a military panel had found Khadr to be an "enemy combatant," which was essentially the same as an "unlawful enemy combatant."
Khadr, a Canadian national, was formally charged [charge sheet, PDF; JURIST report] in April with murder, attempted murder, conspiracy and providing material support for terrorism, as well as spying. He was 15 years old when he was detained in 2002. Khadr allegedly threw a grenade that killed one US soldier and wounded another while fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan. He has remained in US custody despite the dismissal of charges. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Russia criticizes UK refusal to prosecute Putin foe for inciting terrorism
Gabriel Haboubi on July 6, 2007 2:58 PM ET

[JURIST] Russia expressed displeasure with the UK Friday over British refusal [press release] to prosecute exiled business tycoon Boris Berezovsky [Wikipedia profile] for his calls to overthrow Russian President Vladimir Putin [official website]. Berezovsky, who has been living in the UK since 2001 as a refugee, called for a regime change in an April interview with the Guardian [text]. While Berezovsky did say that force was necessary and that he didn't believe democratic means would work, Britain's Crown Prosecution Service [official website] said that since he cited the Ukraine's Orange Revolution [Wikipedia backgrounder] as an example, they "concluded that he appeared to indicate civil disobedience as the model he was advocating." Russia's Prosecutor General office [official website, in Russian] believes Berezovsky should have been charged with inciting terrorism overseas, saying "calls for a violent change of power are a criminal offense in any country."
Although originally a supporter of Putin, Berezovsky fell out of favor with Putin after vocally opposing the war in Chechnya [Wikipedia backgrounder]. Putin opened investigations into Berezovsky's businesses, and Berezovsky fled to the UK. He has been charged in Russia with fraud and political corruption. Had Berezovsky been convicted of inciting terrorism, he would have lost his refugee status and could have been extradited to Russia to face those charges. Without extradition, Berezovsky will be tried in abesntia. RIA Novosti has more. The Guardian has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Chinese former drug safety official sentenced to death for corruption
Michael Sung on July 6, 2007 2:32 PM ET

[JURIST] The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court on Friday convicted former Pharmaceutical Registration Department Director Cao Wenzhuan of corruption and dereliction of duty [JURIST report] for receiving approximately $316,000 in bribes from two pharmaceutical companies in exchange for certifying substandard drugs at the State Food and Drug Administration [official website, in Chinese]. The court sentenced Cao to death on both counts, stripped him of all political rights, and confiscated all of his personal property. The court said the harsh sentence was warranted given Cao's high stature, the enormous bribes involved, and Cao's refusal to confess or return the bribes received. The court did grant Cao a two-year reprieve for his execution, finding that he had provided information that aided in the investigation of other corruption cases.
On Thursday, the same court convicted four other government officials involved in the drug approval process of corruption, issuing sentences ranging from 15 years to life imprisonment. Zheng Xiaoyu, former commissioner of the State Food and Drug Administration, was sentenced to death [JURIST report] in May for receiving $832,000 in bribes and allowing eight companies to bypass the drug approval process. One improperly approved antibiotic is suspected of killing at least 10 people. Zheng, who served as the food and drug commissioner from 1998 to 2005, has appealed his death sentence on the grounds that he should receive leniency because he cooperated with the investigation and has confessed his crimes. Death sentences in China require the approval [JURIST report] of the Supreme People's Court [official website]. AP has more. Xinhua has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

South Dakota to execute first prisoner under new protocols
Gabriel Haboubi on July 6, 2007 2:05 PM ET

[JURIST] South Dakota is preparing to hold its first execution in 60 years next week, AP reported Friday. The execution was halted [JURIST report] last year by Governor Mike Rounds [official website], but the passage of new lethal injection protocols [text] in February cleared up the legal concerns that led to its suspension. While the former law, written in 1984, specified a particular two-drug mixture, February's legislation is much broader, allowing the prison warden the ability to select any lethal injection [JURIST news archive] mixture, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Corrections. Rounds had feared that the state would open itself up to legal liability if it instead used the three-drug cocktail that has become the standard for lethal injections around the country, and has recently been the subject of numerous constitutional challenges [JURIST report].
With no further legal challenges expected, 25-year-old Elijah Page [SD AGO backgrounder] will be put to death for the 2000 murder of 19-year-old Chester Allen Poage. Page pleaded guilty to being one of three people who tortured Poage for over two hours before stabbing and bludgeoning him to death. Page has ended all appeals, and has asked to be put to death. His lawyer told AP that Rounds and the state Supreme Court chief justice have assured Page that the execution can be called off at any time if he wishes to restart his appeals process. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICTY denies prosecution request to move Bosnian war crimes trial out of The Hague
Gabriel Haboubi on July 6, 2007 1:22 PM ET

[JURIST] The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website] has denied [order, PDF] a prosecution motion [PDF text] which sought to move the trial of former Bosnian army commander Rasim Delic [ICTY case backgrounder, PDF; Trial Watch profile] out of the international court at The Hague. Prosecutors sought the change [JURIST report] after the court limited the scope of the trial and the number of witnesses prosecutors could call. In its ruling Thursday, the court emphasized its prior consideration of the prosecution's witness list, its belief that the number of witnesses and amount of time allocated are ample for the prosecution to present its case, and its belief that moving the trial now "would not be in the interests of justice". The court also noted that prosecutors could file motions during the trial if it wished to present additional witnesses, or seek additional time to hear evidence. The trial will begin as scheduled [press release] on July 9.
Delic led Bosnia's Muslim army during the 1992-95 Bosnian war [Wikipedia backgrounder], in Sarajevo, and is accused of a number of crimes [amended indictment, PDF; ICTY materials], including murder, rape, and two counts of cruel treatment. He has pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to the charges. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge upholds torture charges against son of former Liberian president Taylor
Michael Sung on July 6, 2007 12:13 PM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Cecilia Altonaga upheld torture charges [indictment, PDF; JURIST report] Thursday against the son of former Liberian President Charles Taylor, Charles McArthur Emmanuel [JURIST news archive], rejecting Emmanuel's argument that a federal anti-torture statute [18 USC 2340A text] exceeds Congressional authority because it criminalizes behavior of foreign government officials outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Altonaga also rejected Emmanuel's assertion that the statute was vague in its definition of torture, ruling that Emmanuel's alleged conduct would be considered torture in the "civilized world." Emmanuel, whose trial is expected to begin in September, faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment if convicted of torture.
Emmanuel commanded a paramilitary unit in Liberia during his father's regime and is said to have abused a detainee with a hot iron, scalding water, and electric shocks in 2002. Last December, a federal judge denied bail for Emmanuel, ruling that Emmanuel was a flight risk and a danger to the community. Charles Taylor [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] is currently on trial in the The Hague before the Special Court for Sierra Leone [official website; JURIST news archive] for crimes against humanity. AP has more. The South Florida Sun-Sentinel has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

9/11 compensation chief to head Virginia Tech memorial fund
Michael Sung on July 6, 2007 10:27 AM ET

[JURIST] Lawyer Kenneth R. Feinberg [corporate profile] was appointed Thursday to head the distribution effort [press release] of the Hokie Spirit Memorial Fund [academic website] established to aid victims and families of the April 16 massacre at Virginia Tech [JURIST news archive] that left 33 people dead and 25 wounded in the largest shooting spree in US history [MSNBC backgrounder]. Virginia Tech President Charles Steger [academic website] said that Feinberg, who also served as the administrator for the September 11 compensation fund, will work pro bono for the fund and will provide the necessary expert advice in the distribution of approximately $6 million in undesignated donations.
Feinberg, a specialist in mediation, arbitration, and alternative dispute resolution, served pro bono as Special Master [Wex backgrounder] of the federal September 11th Victim Compensation Fund [official website] for 33 months and distributed over $7 billion in public funds to families and victims injured in the September 11 attacks. In January 2003, seven families of 9/11 victims filed a class action lawsuit [complaint, PDF; JURIST report] against Feinberg, alleging that he administered the fund arbitrarily. The families specifically objected to Feinberg's calculation of wrongful death compensation based upon after-tax projections of lost income, and also challenged Feinberg's proposal to cap individual awards over $6 million. The suit, along with two other similar actions, was subsequently dismissed [NYLJ report] by a federal judge who found that Feinberg acted "reasonably and properly" to implement the intent of Congress. The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Thailand constitution panel approves final draft for referendum
Michael Sung on July 6, 2007 8:01 AM ET

[JURIST] Thailand's Constitution Drafting Assembly approved a final draft of a new constitution Friday, paving the way for an August 19 constitutional referendum and possible general elections in December. The 100-member body, appointed by the military, unanimously approved the 309-article draft presented [JURIST report] by the 35-member Constitutional Drafting Committee in April. The new constitution is part of an effort by the ruling Council for National Security [official website; Wikipedia backgrounder] to decrease populist influence by reducing the impact of elections, which plotters of last year's coup blame for bringing former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra [JURIST news archive] into power. Under the proposal [Nation report], the Thai House of Representatives would be reduced from 500 seats to 400 seats, 320 of which will be directly elected and 80 appointed from the party list. A multi-seat constituency system will also replace single-member districts. The proposal also seeks to eliminate direct elections for members of the Senate, who will be instead appointed by national and provisional committees composed of bureaucrats and judicial officials, and will reduce the number of senators from 200 to 150.
Interim Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont [official profile; BBC profile] earlier this week ordered government officials to promote support for the draft [Bangkok Post], and the military-controlled parliament is expected to pass a bill later this month to penalize the obstruction or opposition to the referendum. The draft constitution is expected to face opposition from Buddhist activist groups that have unsuccessfully campaigned for Buddhism as a state-sponsored religion, democracy activists, and Thaksin's supporters. If the draft constitution is rejected by popular referendum, military leaders are authorized under the interim constitution imposed after last September's coup [JURIST reports] to revise an earlier constitution. AP has more. Reuters has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|