JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Thursday, June 28, 2007

White House cites executive privilege to block testimony on US Attorney firings
Michael Sung at 11:36 AM ET

[JURIST] The White House Thursday rejected congressional subpoenas [JURIST report] for the testimony of former White House counsel Harriet Miers [official profile] and former White House Political Director Sara Taylor [SourceWatch profile] and their documents relevant to the ongoing probe of the US Attorney firings controversy [JURIST news archive]. In a letter [PDF text] to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) [official websites], Solicitor General Paul Clement said that

for the President to perform his constitutional duties, it is imperative that he receive candid and unfettered advice and that free and open discussions and deliberations occur among his advisers and between those advisers and others within and outside the Executive Branch. Presidents would not be able to fulfill their responsibilities if their advisers on fear of being commanded to Capitol Hill to testify or having their documents produced to Congress were reluctant to communicate openly and honestly in the course of rendering advice and reaching decisions. These confidentiality interests are especially strong in situations like the present controversy, where the inquiry seeks information relating to the President's powers to appoint and remove U.S. Attorneys — authority granted exclusively to the President by the Constitution.
Leahy characterized [press release] the response as "Nixonian stonewalling," and promised to "take the necessary steps to enforce our subpoenas backed by the full force of the law." Conyers condemned [press release] the White House response as an indication of the "reckless disrespect this administration has for the rule of law" and also pledged to enforce the subpoenas, which may ultimately result in contempt of Congress [backgrounder] citations against Miers and Taylor. Both lawmakers rejected the White House's offer of providing unrecorded testimony behind closed doors. AP has more.





Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Illinois Senate approves medical marijuana bill
12:47 PM ET, May 18

 Portugal expands adoption rights for same-sex couples
12:10 PM ET, May 18

 Colorado sheriffs challenge new gun control laws
11:08 AM ET, May 18

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org