A Collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh

Pakistan high court asserts jurisdiction over Chaudhry case

[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Pakistan [official website] ruled Monday that it has jurisdiction over legal disputes involving the suspension of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry [official website; JURIST news archive] and admitted Chaudhry's petition challenging the legality of his March 9 suspension [JURIST report] by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf. The ruling, considered a victory for Chaudhry, frustrates the efforts of government lawyers, who had argued [JURIST report] that the five-member Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) was a full court capable of both investigating the alleged misconduct and reviewing the legality of the suspension. The government had sought to end the Supreme Court's suspension [JURIST report] of the SJC's inquiry.

The high court's ruling was delayed [JURIST report] last week, in what legal observers say may have been a reflection of internal disagreements amongst the 13 justices that sit on the bench. On Monday, a Pakistani government minister indicated that the government had prepared a new complaint [JURIST report] against Chaudhry and will file the document at an "appropriate time." In May, presiding Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday said that the court will make a judgment on the merit of Chaudhry's petition [JURIST report] regardless of possible political consequences. Reuters has more. PTI has additional coverage.

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.