Pakistan high court judge resists government bid to deny jurisdiction over Chaudhry case Michael Sung at 9:40 AM ET
[JURIST] Pakistan Supreme Court Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday Monday refuted arguments made by government lawyers that the Supreme Court of Pakistan [official website] should not "interfere with [the Supreme Judicial Council's (SJC)] proceedings or assume jurisdiction" of the inquiry into alleged misconduct by ousted Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry [official website; JURIST news archive] because the SJC is a fully independent court that is capable of reviewing the legality of Chaudhry's March 9 suspension [JURIST report]. Ramday retorted that if the SJC was indistinguishable from a court, then Pakistan's constitutional provisions [text] governing the SJC would be superfluous because the "supreme court [already] existed." Government lawyers had argued that that the five-member SJC was a full court capable of both investigating the alleged misconduct and reviewing the legality of Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf's March 9 order suspending Chaudhry, and sought the Supreme Court to end its suspension [JURIST report] of the SJC's inquiry.
Last Thursday, the Supreme Court of Pakistan extended [JURIST report] that suspension, denying a government request to resume the SJC's proceedings and dismiss a petition filed by Chaudhry. AP has more.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.