 |
|

Legal news from Friday, May 18, 2007 |
 |
|


Kazakhstan parliament removes term limits for president
Gabriel Haboubi on May 18, 2007 2:13 PM ET

[JURIST] Kazakhstan's parliament [official website] removed term limits on the rule of President Nursultan Nazarbayev [official website, BBC profile] Friday, effectively allowing him to remain president for life. The measure only applies to Nazarbayev, and subsequent presidents would have to abide by the law limiting them to two terms in office. Another constitutional change, supported by Nazarbayev [statement, in English], reduced the length of a president's term from 7 years to 5. Nazarbayev must still approve the move for it to become law.
Nazarbayev has been in power since 1989, but the country has never had elections considered fair and free by western monitors. He was last elected [BBC report] in December 2005 with 91 percent of the vote, but international observers raised concerns of fraud [JURIST report]. Opposition parties challenged the results [JURIST report], to no avail. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

State-mandated Internet censorship on the rise: report
Michael Sung on May 18, 2007 12:36 PM ET

[JURIST] A study released Friday by the OpenNet Initiative (ONI) [advocacy website] has found a "substantial growth in the scale, scope and sophistication" of Internet censorship [JURIST news archive] worldwide. The study, focusing on state-mandated censorship, found evidence of content filtering in 25 of 41 countries tested. The study found that states generally justified censorship as protecting property rights and national security, preserving cultural and religious values, and fighting pornography and child exploitation. Internet censorship was noted in the following states: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, China, Ethiopia, India, Iran, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, Myanmar, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vietnam and Yemen.
The ONI is a collaborative partnership of academics from the Citizen Lab at the Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto; the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School; the Advanced Network Research Group at the Cambridge Security Programme, University of Cambridge; and the Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University [university websites]. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

House calls for Guantanamo shutdown plan in defense spending bill amendment
Michael Sung on May 18, 2007 10:45 AM ET

[JURIST] The US House of Representatives voted 220-208 [roll call] Thursday to pass an amendment [PDF text, via CR] to the FY'08 Defense Authorization Bill [PDF text; HR 1585 summary] to require the Office of the Secretary of Defense to develop a report within 60 days after the bill is signed into law, identifying the "current capacity at Department of Defense (DOD) facilities in the United States to securely hold and try before a military commission the detainees currently held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba." The amendment, introduced by Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) [official profile; press release], will require the DOD to identify the number of detainees that will be charged with a crime, subject to a release or transfer, or held without being charged with a crime, and also seeks to ensure that detainees scheduled for release are "released no later than December 31, 2007." Moran characterized the detentions at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] as "a stain on our reputation as a nation - governed by the rule of law - that respects justice and democracy," and said that "the policy options before the President and Congress should not be limited by a lack of information." The House passed the appropriations bill by a 397-27 vote [roll call]. The Senate must still pass its version of the legislation, and the bills will need to be reconciled.
Pentagon officials say that they plan to try approximately 80 of the 385 detainees designated as "enemy combatants" [JURIST news archive] under the framework created by Military Commission Act of 2006 [PDF text], and plan to transfer around 80 detainees to other countries. The remaining detainees are in legal limbo. On Tuesday, a federal appeals court heard arguments [JURIST report] brought by detainees challenging their designation as "enemy combatants." Last Tuesday, three US lawmakers introduced legislation to close the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST report]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

India court hands down first sentences in 1993 Mumbai bombing case
Michael Sung on May 18, 2007 9:53 AM ET

[JURIST] A court in India [JURIST news archive] sentenced five people to three years in prison and a fine of $610 each Friday for their role in the deadly 1993 Mumbai bombings [BBC backgrounder] that killed 257 people and injured more than 700 in India's financial center. The five defendants had each been found to be guilty of transporting weapons and ammunition on fishing vessels and Judge Pramod Kode said that the defendants were spared from the maximum sentence of up to seven years in prison because they were unaware of the contents of the containers they smuggled. Other defendants, convicted of charges ranging from covering conspiracy, illegal possession of arms and explosives, aiding terrorist acts, and waging war against the state, face maximum sentences ranging from five years to life in prison for their role in the bombings.
The trial, which began in 1995, included testimony from 757 witnesses and has resulted in the conviction of over 100 defendants [JURIST report], a figure that public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam described as unprecedented. Thirty-five suspects, including the alleged mastermind of the bombings, Dawood Ibrahim [BBC profile], remain at large. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US and allies circulate Security Council resolution for Hariri tribunal
Michael Sung on May 18, 2007 8:58 AM ET

[JURIST] The United States, France, and the United Kingdom circulated a draft UN Security Council resolution Thursday, which if approved will unilaterally establish a tribunal under Chapter VII of the UN Charter [texts] to investigate and try suspects in the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri [JURIST news archive]. According to AP, the resolution would enforce an agreement [JURIST report] reached between UN negotiators and Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora [BBC profile] but which has failed to be approved by Lebanon's Parliament due to a deadlock. The proposed resolution was discussed at a closed-door meeting with representatives from the five permanent Security Council members, and the resolution's backers are optimistic that it will not face strong opposition because the resolution enforces an existing agreement and does not impose a new UN tribunal without Lebanese input.
On Monday, Siniora sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, formally requesting that the Security Council unilaterally create an ad hoc tribunal [JURIST report] to investigate the Hariri assassination. The Hariri tribunal has been a source of major disagreement in Lebanon's deeply sectarian political arena. The pro-Syrian Lebanese President Emile Lahoud [official profile] and Speaker of the National Assembly, Nabih Berri [official profile], oppose the Hariri tribunal, and Berri has refused to convene the National Assembly to prevent ratification of the agreement establishing the tribunal. Lahoud responded to Siniora's letter Tuesday, saying that a Security Council resolution "would imply a full bypass of the constitutional mechanisms in Lebanon" and would "hamper the court's judicial capacities to hold an impartial trial." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|