 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, May 3, 2007 |
 |
|


Canada signs new detainee transfer agreement with Afghan government
Bernard Hibbitts on May 3, 2007 5:12 PM ET

[JURIST] Lawyers for the Canadian government said in an affidavit Thursday that Canada and Afghanistan have formally signed a new agreement allowing for monitoring of prisoners transferred from Canadian to Afghan custody as a safeguard against torture and abuse. Following submission of the affidavit, a Federal Court judge in British Columbia halted an injunction [JURIST report] action brought by Amnesty International and the BC Civil Liberties union which had sought to suspend any additional transfers until effective monitoring was established. CTV News has more.
The Canadian government has been deeply embroiled in controversy over the torture issue since the Toronto Globe and Mail reported [text] late last month that thirty terror suspects were tortured by Afghan security forces after being transferred from the custody of Canadian troops belonging to NATO's ISAF [official website] mission. The detainees gave accounts of being beaten, electrocuted, starved, and left in freezing temperatures while detained in Kandahar province jails. The report prompted calls for the resignation [JURIST report] of Canadian Defense Minister Gordon O'Connor [official profile], for an end to the prison transfers, for a public inquiry, and even for an International Criminal Court investigation of "possible war crimes" [JURIST report] committed by Canadian officials.
In 2005, Chief of Defense Staff Gen. Rick Hillier [official profile] signed an initial Canada-Afghanistan Detainee Agreement [text] authorizing prisoner transfers, but critics said the agreement did not give Canada the power to inspect detainees [JURIST report] after their transfers, thus allowing broad latitude for torture to occur. Last week O'Connor said that Canada had made a new informal agreement with the Afghanistan government [JURIST report] to monitor the condition of transferred prisoners after their release.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Religious freedom imperiled in Iraq: US panel
Mike Rosen-Molina on May 3, 2007 3:17 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Commission on International Religious Freedom [official website] Wednesday released [press release] its annual report on worldwide religious freedom [PDF], finding for the first time since the ouster of Saddam Hussein that freedom of religious worship in Iraq is under severe threat. The commission pointed to increasing government abuse and sectarian violence, including arbitrary arrests, torture and rape, against Sunni and Shiite Muslims and religious minorities, in coming to its decision.
The commission maintains a list of countries designated as "countries of particular concern" (CPC) [US Department of State backgrounder], where rights abuses are so widespread that those countries may be subject to US sanctions. The commission also has a Watch List of countries "where conditions do not rise to the statutory level requiring CPC designation" but where violations of religious freedom are nonetheless commonplace and tolerated by the government. Iraq [JURIST news archive] has been added to the Watch List, although three of the four Democratic appointees to the 10 member panel argued that it should be designated as a CPC. The report found that most religious abuses were committed by gangs and terrorist groups, but that the Iraqi government also participated in violations, ignoring attacks on Iraq's minority Sunnis, the most frequent targets of religious violence, by armed Shia factions.
In the 2007 report, the commission listed Burma, North Korea, Eritrea, Iran, Pakistan, China, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam as CPCs and recommended that they be subjected to US sanctions. Besides Iraq, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Cuba, Egypt, Indonesia, and Nigeria appear on the panel's Watch List. The panel's recommendations are not binding, although the US government may consider them in formulating its foreign policy. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Nebraska high court stays electrocution to weigh constitutional concerns
Katerina Ossenova on May 3, 2007 10:41 AM ET

[JURIST] The Nebraska Supreme Court [official website] issued an order [PDF text] Wednesday staying the execution of Carey Dean Moore [Amnesty profile] while the court determines whether death by electrocution is cruel and unusual punishment. In a 4-3 decision, the Court noted that recent US Supreme Court decisions have raised the question whether electrocution is constitutional and hence the court's "responsibility to decide whether electrocution is lawful requires us to consider whether any convicted person should be electrocuted before that question is answered." Nebraska adopted a new electrocution method in which first, a single 20-second, 2,450-volt jolt is used then officials wait 18 minutes to determine if an inmate is still alive, and administer a second jolt if needed. The court issued the stay after Nebraska Sen. Ernie Chambers [official profile] requested that the death penalty process be reviewed before anyone else is put to death. Moore was scheduled to die Tuesday for the murders of two Omaha cab drivers in 1979. Nebraska is the only state to solely rely on the electric chair for capital punishment; its last execution was in 1997. AP has more.
The lethal injection [JURIST news archive] method of execution has also received its share of scrutiny in recent months. Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen issued a moratorium on executions [executive order, PDF; JURIST report] in February and directed the Tennessee Commissioner of Corrections to conduct a comprehensive review of the manner in which death sentences are administered; Bredesen accepted revised death penalty protocols [JURIST report] on Monday, clearing the way for executions to resume in the state. A North Carolina state judge issued an injunction [JURIST report] in January blocking two executions until Governor Mike Easley issues new procedures to execute capital defendants without the presence of doctors. Capital punishment has also been suspended in Florida, California, and Maryland [JURIST reports]. An increased number of states have begun to review the administration of the death penalty following the botched execution of Angel Diaz [Amnesty profile] in December 2006.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

'No progress' on Hariri tribunal: top UN lawyer
Jeannie Shawl on May 3, 2007 9:02 AM ET

[JURIST] UN Undersecretary-General for Legal Affairs Nicolas Michel [official profile] has been unable to break a deadlock within the Lebanese government preventing approval of an international tribunal to try suspects in the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri [JURIST news archive], Michel told the UN Security Council Wednesday. Michel traveled to Lebanon [JURIST report] last month in an effort to revitalize the ratification process of an agreement [JURIST report] to establish the tribunal. The agreement has been approved by the Lebanese cabinet, but Lebanon's pro-Syrian parliamentary speaker Nabih Berri has refused to convene parliament, preventing the ratification of the agreement. Michel said Wednesday that he saw "no progress" [press briefing summary; recorded video], despite the fact that both the government and opposition have expressed support, in principle, for the tribunal. According to Michel, "the main issue was not the tribunal, but the Government's composition."
The Security Council could establish the tribunal under Chapter VII of the UN Charter [text], which would require Lebanon's compliance, but Michel refused to confirm plans to do so Wednesday. AP has more. The UN News Service has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|