 |
|

Legal news from Monday, April 23, 2007 |
 |
|


Afghan torture claim prompts calls for Canada defense chief resignation
Caitlin Price on April 23, 2007 8:04 PM ET

[JURIST] Thirty terror suspects were tortured by Afghan security forces after being being transferred from Canadian custody, the Toronto Globe and Mail reported [text] Monday. The detainees gave accounts of being beaten, electrocuted, starved, and left in freezing temperatures while detained in Kandahar province jails. The report prompted calls for the resignation of Canadian Defense Minister Gordon O'Connor [official profile] by Canadian opposition members from the New Democratic Party, Liberal Party [party websites], and Bloc Québécois [party website, in French]. Opposition MPs also called for an end to the prison transfers and for a public inquiry to be held. O'Connor and Prime Minister Stephen Harper [official website] maintain that Canadian troops did nothing wrong but pledged to investigate the allegations.
In February the Canadian government ordered an official inquiry [JURIST report] into reported detainee abuse in Afghanistan. The probe began following a civilian complaint filed by University of Ottawa law professor Amir Attaran [Sourcewatch profile], whose research [Globe and Mail report] uncovered a pattern of suspicious injuries on three detainees captured last April and later released. In 2005, Chief of Defense Staff Gen. Rick Hillier [official profile] signed the Canada-Afghanistan Detainee Agreement [text] authorizing the transfers; Attaran said the agreement did not give Canada the power to inspect detainees [JURIST report] after their transfers, thus allowing broad latitude for torture to occur. CBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court hears arguments in auto passenger rights case
Caitlin Price on April 23, 2007 6:53 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday in Brendlin v. California [ABA merit briefs], 06-8120, in which the Court must determine whether an automobile passenger, convicted on drug charges resulting from an illegal traffic stop, may contest the legality of the stop under the Fourth Amendment [text]. In 2001, Bruce Edward Brendlin was convicted in California of manufacturing methamphetamine based on evidence found in a car during a stop which the state later conceded was baseless. Brendlin moved to suppress the evidence, arguing that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures should be extended to protect passengers as well as drivers. California is one of only three states that does not allow passengers to assert such a defense. Justices Kennedy, Breyer and Scalia expressed concern regarding the implications of the state's argument that passengers are not seized during a stop. Justice Kennedy said, "I think indications from the bench are we just don't think passengers, a, are or, b, should feel free to leave when there's a traffic stop." The Court is expected to rule by the end of June.
The Supreme Court of California [official website] ruled against Brendlin [opinion, PDF] in 2006, holding that passengers are not automatically seized during a traffic stop, and allowed the evidence to be used in the trial. Brendlin is now backed by the American Civil Liberties Union and NAACP [advocacy websites], which fear that a judgment for the state would give police broad power to stop vehicles to search passengers. Brendlin's conviction may stand regardless of the Court's ruling, as at the time of arrest he was wanted for an unrelated parole violation, which itself may have justified the state's search. AP has more.
The Supreme Court also heard oral arguments in two other cases Monday. In United States v. Atlantic Research Corp [transcript, PDF; merit briefs], 06-562, the Court must decide whether owners of areas contaminated by hazardous materials that must be cleaned up under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) [text] can recover contribution from other responsible parties before they are subject to a government enforcement action. In Hinck v. United States [transcript, PDF; merit briefs], 06-376, the Court will decide whether tax courts have exclusive jurisdiction to review an IRS decision to deny a taxpayers request for interest abatement or whether district courts and Federal Claims Court also have such jurisdiction.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush defends Gonzales amid more criticism of US Attorney firings
Alexis Unkovic on April 23, 2007 10:52 AM ET

[JURIST] President Bush defended US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [official profile] Monday after US Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website], the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, publicly criticized [Fox News Sunday transcript] Gonzales Sunday for his role in the controversial firing of eight US attorneys [JURIST news archive] and said Gonzales' testimony before the Judiciary Committee [JURIST report] last week was "very, very damaging to his own credibility." Specter did not explicitly call for Gonzales to resign, but he emphasized that Gonzales' conduct in the US Attorney firing scandal has harmed both the US Department of Justice [official website] and the Bush administration. Gonzales has repeatedly defended [JURIST report] his role in the firings and has not indicated he will step down from his position in response to several calls for his resignation [JURIST report]. AP has more.
Bush defended Gonzales [statement] Monday while speaking to the press after a meeting with General David Petraeus to discuss the ongoing War in Iraq. Bush said of Gonzales' testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee: The Attorney General went up and gave a very candid assessment, and answered every question he could possibly answer, honestly answer, in a way that increased my confidence in his ability to do the job.
One of the things that's important for the American people to understand is that the Attorney General has a right to recommend to me to replace U.S. attorneys. U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President. In other words, we have named them, and I have the right to replace them with somebody else. And as the investigation, the hearings went forward, it was clear that the Attorney General broke no law, did no wrongdoing. And some senators didn't like his explanation, but he answered as honestly as he could. This is an honest, honorable man, in whom I have confidence. Bush has emphasized his confidence in Gonzales [JURIST report] in the wake of the US Attorney firings on several previous occasions. AP has additional coverage.
2:58 PM ET - Gonzales said Monday that he intended to remain as attorney general "as long as I can continue to serve effectively." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Russia ex-president Yeltsin dies leaving legacy of constitutional change, corruption
Bernard Hibbitts on April 23, 2007 10:18 AM ET

[JURIST] Boris Yeltsin [Wikipedia profile], Russia's first elected president and the primary architect of the country's shift towards democratic government in the 1990s, died Monday, according to Russian wire services. Yeltsin was 76 and had a history of health problems, including heart trouble. Initial wire reports did not give the cause of death but said that Yeltsin died "suddenly." First elected president of Russia in June 1991 in what turned out to be the last months of the former Soviet Union, the former Politburo member and Moscow mayor [timeline] shot to political ascendancy after disaffected Soviet generals attempted a military coup against Soviet Communist leader Mikhail Gorbachev - the famous architect of perestroika and glasnost and rapprochement with the West - in August of that year. Yeltsin famously stood on a tank in central Moscow, defying the coup leaders. After the failure of the coup Yeltsin filled a political vacuum left by the weakened Gorbachev and ultimately presided over the formal end of the USSR, restoring the name and flag of "Russia" and realigning Russia's relationship with the former Soviet republics.
Yeltsin's rapid drive for liberalizing economic and political reforms rapidly brought him into conflict with legislators in the two Soviet-era parliamentary chambers, the Supreme Soviet and the Congress of People's Deputies. Tensions came to a head in 1993 when the Yeltsin attempted to suspend those bodies [WP report] pending new elections and approval of a new constitution [Wikipedia backgrounder]. The legislators in turn impeached Yeltsin and declared him removed. Public protests against Yeltsin began in late September, but the standoff between the two opposing sides was effectively broken by the military and security services in early October when they threw their support behind Yeltsin, enabling him to suppress the parliamentarians by shelling the parliament building. The constitutional changes [new constitution, text] Yeltsin wanted were pushed through in a December 1993 referendum approved by over 58 percent of voters, increasing the political power of the Russian presidency in a broadly democratic political structure.
The latter years of Yeltsin's presidency were marked by increasing economic troubles and allegations of corruption as free market forces were left to run rampant in the newly-liberalized country, giving rise to a class of capitalist "oligarchs". Yeltsin was accused of being involved in bribery and nepotism, and his hold on power loosened as his health declined and rumors of excessive drinking [BBC report] abounded. He faced an additional call for his impeachment from opposition members of the reconstituted State Duma [official website] in 1999, alleging he had acted unconstitutionally in dissolving the former Soviet Union, but the motion did not win enough votes to carry. Yeltsin announced his own resignation from the presidency in favor of secret police head Vladimir Putin on December 31, 1999. One of Putin's first acts on assuming office was to grant his predecessor lifetime immunity from prosecution [BBC report]. RFE/RL has more. The Russian Presidency website provides an official record of Yeltsin's career [in Russian].
11:45 AM ET - Russian news agencies are now saying that Yeltsin died of "long-term heart trouble" [RIA Novosti report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|