 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, February 27, 2007 |
 |
|


Former FDA chief put on probation, fined for dealing in stock of regulated companies
Katerina Ossenova on February 27, 2007 2:41 PM ET

[JURIST] US District Court for the District of Columbia Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson [official profile] Tuesday sentenced former US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [official website] commissioner Dr. Lester M. Crawford [official profile; JURIST news archive] to three years supervised probation and imposed about $90,000 in fines. Crawford had pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to misdemeanor charges [criminal information] of conflict of interest and false writing [US Code text] in October 2006. The sentence handed down by Robinson is harsher than the deal reached by Crawford's lawyer and representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia [official website] in which Crawford was to receive probation and a fine of $50,000. Robinson decided to delay Crawford's sentencing [JURIST report] in January because the two sides had not explained to the court why they did not follow federal sentencing guidelines in agreeing upon a punishment. While acknowledging that the fine exceeds the parties' agreement, Robinson noted that both crimes carry a combined maximum penalty of 2 years in prison and a $200,000 fine, making her fine well below the statutory maximum.
The charges against Crawford stemmed from a grand jury investigation [JURIST report] begun after the New York Times reported [text] in October 2005 that Crawford and/or his wife had failed to disclose their ownership and sale of stock in FDA-regulated companies, such as Embrex, Sysco, Teleflex and PepsiCo [corporate websites]. Crawford resigned [JURIST report] after serving only two months as FDA commissioner in September 2005. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court hears arguments in autistic child legal representation case
Brett Murphy on February 27, 2007 2:17 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Tuesday in Winkelman v. Parma City School District [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], 05-983 [docket], where the court must decide whether parents of an autistic child can represent their child in federal court in suits arising under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA) [text, 20 USC §1400]. The Winkelmans argue that the act permits parents to represent their children without lawyers because of the tightly interwoven rights of the parent and child, and that without pro se representation, those who cannot afford lawyers cannot bring suit against school districts that refuse to accomodate their disabled children.
The US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals [official website] ruled [decision, PDF] against the Winkelmans, holding that while parties are permitted to represent themselves in court, non-lawyers are not permitted to represent other parties pro se. The Sixth Circuit also held that parents are permitted to represent their disabled children in administrative proceedings, but that the IDEA does not extend that right to judicial proceedings. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICC prosecutor asks judges to summon ex-interior minister, militia leader for Darfur crimes
Jeannie Shawl on February 27, 2007 11:59 AM ET

[JURIST] Luis Moreno-Ocampo [official profile], chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court [official website] asked a panel of ICC judges Tuesday to issue summonses for two top suspects accused of committing war crimes in the Darfur region of Sudan. The call was the first action taken against individuals in the ICC's ongoing investigation [JURIST news archive] of the Darfur situation. In his application [PDF text; annexes; summary, PDF], Moreno-Ocampo accused former Sudanese Interior Minister Ahmad Muhammad Harun and militia leader Ali Kushayb of "jointly committed crimes against the civilian population in Darfur." Haroun currently serves as the Sudanese state humanitarian affairs minister, which is not a full ministerial position. According to an ICC press release: Based on evidence collected during the last 20 months, the Prosecution has concluded there are reasonable grounds to believe that Ahmad Harun and Ali Kushayb, (also known as Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman) bear criminal responsibility in relation to 51 counts of alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes. The evidence shows they acted together, and with others, with the common purpose of carrying out attacks against the civilian populations. Moreno-Ocampo's application was filed under Article 58(7) of the ICC's governing Rome Statute [PDF text], which states:As an alternative to seeking a warrant of arrest, the Prosecutor may submit an application requesting that the Pre-Trial Chamber issue a summons for the person to appear. If the Pre-Trial Chamber is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person committed the crime alleged and that a summons is sufficient to ensure the person's appearance, it shall issue the summons, with or without conditions restricting liberty (other than detention) if provided for by national law, for the person to appear. The ICC began its investigation of crimes in Darfur [ICC fact sheet, PDF; ICC situation materials] in 2005 after the situation was referred [JURIST report] to the court by the UN Security Council.
Under the Rome Statute, the ICC can only prosecute individuals for war crimes, genocide or crimes against humanity when a state is unwilling or unable to genuinely prosecute. Sudan has repeatedly rejected the ICC's jurisdiction [JURIST report] over the Darfur situation, a sentiment reiterated Tuesday Sudanese Justice Minister Mohamed Ali al-Mardi. In a news conference following Moreno-Ocampo's filing at the ICC, al-Mardi said that Sudan already has Ali Kushayb in custody [Sudan Tribune report] and said that Moreno-Ocampo's evidence was based on lies told ICC investigators by "people who bear arms against the state, bear arms against citizens and kill innocent citizens in Darfur." Also Tuesday, a top advisor to Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir told the Sudan News Agency that the government would reject any trial [SUNA report] of Sudanese nationals outside the country.
Moreno-Ocampo addressed these concerns in his own press briefing [transcript] Tuesday:The Government of the Sudan informed the Prosecution that Ali KUSHAYB is under criminal investigation and was arrested on the 28th of November 2006.
Our case is about Ahmad Harun and Ali Kushayb joining each other to attack the civilian population in Darfur. There is no such investigation in the Sudan.
On this basis, the Prosecution has concluded that the case is admissible. To be clear, the admissibility assessment is not a judgement on the Sudanese justice system as a whole. We are just assessing if the Sudanese authorities are carrying out the same case. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

California appeals court upholds stem cell research program
Holly Manges Jones on February 27, 2007 7:43 AM ET

[JURIST] A California state appeals court ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday that the state's stem cell research [JURIST news archive] program "suffers from no constitutional or other legal infirmity," leading the way for approximately $3 billion in grant money to be awarded to researchers. The Court of Appeal of the State of California First District upheld last year's lower court decision [JURIST report] upholding the constitutionality of the program, operated by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [official website]. The lower court determined that the stem cell program was being administered with sufficient state control and did not violate ballot initiative or conflicts of interest rules.
The research program, known as Proposition 71 [CA AG summary, PDF], was approved [JURIST report] in a 2004 state referendum by a 59 percent margin. In its ruling, the appeals court noted the delay in research that the litigation had caused: The objective of the proposition is to find, "as speedily as possible," therapies for the treatment and cure of major diseases and injuries, an aim the legitimacy of which no one disputes. The very pendency of this litigation, however, has interfered with implementation for more than two years. The lawsuit against the program [JURIST report] was brought by the California Family Bioethics Council and two anti-tax organizations - the People's Advocate and the National Tax Limitation Foundation [advocacy websites]. A lawyer for the plaintiffs said they would consider an appeal after reviewing the court's opinion, admitting that the California Supreme Court [official website] refuses to hear many appeals. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|