 |
|

Legal news from Friday, February 23, 2007 |
 |
|


UN human rights experts condemn draft Nigeria anti-gay law
Gabriel Haboubi on February 23, 2007 4:27 PM ET

[JURIST] United Nations human rights experts Friday condemned [press release] a proposed Nigerian law [JURIST report] banning gay marriage and tightening laws criminalizing homosexuality in the country. While engaging in homosexual acts in Nigeria is already punishable by death by stoning, the UN experts said the new law, which authorizes a maximum five-year sentence for any person found to be openly gay, will make persons engaging in, or perceived to be engaging in, same sex relationships in Nigeria more susceptible to arbitrary arrests, detention, torture and ill-treatment and expose them even more to violence and attacks on their dignity. They also said the law would violate Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [text] specifying that all human beings are born equal in dignity and rights. Friday's statement was jointly issued by Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rights Defenders Hina Jilani; Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance Doudou Diène; Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences Yakin Ertürk; and Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health Paul Hunt.
Some speculate that the Nigerian law, which could pass both the House and Senate by the end of March, is a response to a civil unions law [JURIST report] enacted by South Africa last November. With that legislation, South Africa became the first African nation to recognize same-sex unions. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

South Africa court dismisses Equatorial Guinea coup plot charges
JURIST Staff on February 23, 2007 2:18 PM ET

[JURIST] A South African court Friday dismissed charges against eight South African mercenaries suspected of plotting a coup [BBC backgrounder] against the president of Equatorial Guinea [JURIST news archive]. The Pretoria judge found that the state had not proven its case against the men. Lawyers for the defendants argued that South African officials were behind the failed plot, but the South African government denied any involvement. The eight men were arrested in 2004 in Zimbabwe for allegedly purchasing weapons in preparation for a coup against Equatorial Guinea president Teodoro Obiang Nguema [BBC profile], who assumed power himself through a coup in 1979.
In 2004, over 60 other mercenaries involved in the plot were tried and sentenced [JURIST report] in Zimbabwe, most receiving one year jail sentences. The alleged coup leader, British national Simon Mann [BBC profile], received a four-year prison term in Zimbabwe for buying weapons without a license. In 2005, Sir Mark Thatcher [BBC profile], son of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, pleaded guilty to charges related to the failed coup and was fined [JURIST reports]. BBC News has more. South Africa's Mail & Guardian has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK court denies compensation for Algerian-born pilot wrongly detained after 9/11
Michael Sung on February 23, 2007 10:18 AM ET

[JURIST] The UK High Court has rejected [judgment text] the legal bid of Algerian-born pilot Lotfi Raissi [BBC report; Wikipedia profile] for compensation for his wrongful detention. Raissi was held under a US extradition warrant after being indicted [text, PDF] by a federal grand jury in Arizona shortly following the September 11 attacks [JURIST news archive]. US prosecutors alleged Raissi offered pilot training to the hijackers, but lacking evidence, sought his extradition on the grounds that Raissi had falsified his pilot's license application by failing to disclose a knee operation. The extradition request was rejected [BBC report] by a British judge for lack of evidence linking Raissi to terrorism.
Raissi was arrested naked in his home with his wife and brother on September 21, 2001. He was granted conditional bail [BBC report] on February 12, 2002 after almost five months detention because the US government was unable to submit any materials and documents to support its allegations. He sought compensation [BBC report] from the UK government under a scheme approved by the UK Home Office which, according to the court, allows for payments "to persons whose convictions are quashed on appeal or who, following charge, have not been proceeded against or have been acquitted of crime at trial." In its judgment Thursday, the UK court ruled that Raissi's claim did not fall within the ex gratia scheme because the claim stemmed from extradition proceedings, not from Britain's domestic criminal process. AP has more. BBC News has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal jury orders Microsoft to pay $1.52B in MP3 patent case
Michael Sung on February 23, 2007 9:00 AM ET

[JURIST] A federal jury in California awarded [special verdict form, PDF] Alcatel-Lucent [corporate website] $1.52 billion dollars in damages Thursday for violations of two of Alcatel-Lucent's digital music patents committed by Microsoft [corporate website; JURIST news archive]. The patents govern technology that converts audio input into MPEG-1 Audio Layer 3, more commonly known as MP3, which Microsoft has incorporated into several variants of its Windows Media Player [product website]. Microsoft has said that it properly licenses the MP3 technology [press release] from Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft [official website], a German company which Microsoft describes as the "industry recognized licensor." Microsoft plans to appeal the jury's decision, which could have far-reaching implications in the digital media industry, as large numbers of companies in the industry, including Apple, Nokia, and Sony, license its MP3 technology from Fraunhofer.
Related claims against Gateway and Dell [corporate websites] are still pending. Lucent Technologies filed 15 patent claims in 2003 alleging that the PC makers violated patents governing technology developed by its research and development organization, Bell Laboratories [corporate website]. Microsoft joined in the litigation as an intervenor and counter-claimant, due to its wide circulation of Windows Media Player through its Windows operating system [product website]. Lucent Technologies was acquired by Alcatel in December of 2006. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US soldier sentenced to 100 years for Mahmudiya rape-murder
Jeannie Shawl on February 23, 2007 8:18 AM ET

[JURIST] US Army Sgt. Paul E. Cortez received a 100-year prison sentence Thursday for his role in the rape and murder of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl [JURIST news archive] and the murder of her family in the Mahmudiya (also "Mahmoudiya") area last March. Cortez pleaded guilty [JURIST report] earlier this week to felony murder, rape and conspiracy to rape. He will be dishonorably discharged from the Army and will be eligible for parole after 10 years. His plea agreement [JURIST report], which requires that he testify against others involved in the incident, allowed him to avoid the death penalty.
In November, Army Spc. James P. Barker pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to the rape and murder charges and was sentenced to 90 years in prison [JURIST report], an effective life sentence, but with the possibility of parole. Barker also agreed to testify against the other soldiers implicated [JURIST report] in the attack. Pfcs. Jesse Spielman and Bryan Howard still face military charges and former US Army Pfc. Steven D. Green [JURIST news archive], discharged from the military because of a personality disorder before the allegations arose, has pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] in his civilian trial in federal court in Kentucky. Green is said to have been the key player in the rape and murders. It was recently revealed that three months before the attack, Green was diagnosed by military mental health workers as a homicidal threat [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Lawsuit seeks retraction of US government statements on medical marijuana
Joe Shaulis on February 23, 2007 6:30 AM ET

[JURIST] A group that advocates the therapeutic use of marijuana [JURIST news archive] is suing the US Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services [official websites] for their statements that the drug has no medical value. According to a complaint [PDF text] filed Wednesday in US District Court in San Francisco, Americans for Safe Access (ASA) [advocacy website] alleges that the government's statements "deter sick and dying persons from seeking to obtain medicine that could provide them with needed, and often life-saving, relief." ASA's lawsuit invokes the Data Quality Act (DQA) [text; OMB materials; ASA backgrounder], which President Bush signed in 2001 to ensure "the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information" disseminated by federal agencies. The statute allows citizens to seek correction of flawed information. "The FDA position on medical cannabis is incorrect, dishonest and a flagrant violation of laws requiring the government to base policy on sound science," ASA chief counsel Joe Elford said in a press release [text].
ASA asserts that scientific research, including a new study involving AIDS patients [abstract] and a 1999 Institute of Medicine report [text], has shown that marijuana is effective in treating some illnesses. The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction barring the agencies from disseminating statements [text] that marijuana "has no currently accepted medical use" and ordering them to correct the statements. The New York Times has more. The San Francisco Chronicle has local coverage.
About a dozen US states permit the use of medical marijuana. Rhode Island joined that list last year, when legislators overrode the governor's veto [JURIST report] of a bill allowing patients to use marijuana under a physician's supervision. However, the US Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. Raich [opinion text; Duke Law case backgrounder] validated Congress's power to criminalize the growth and personal use of marijuana for medical purposes.
This report was prepared in partnership with the Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|