Supreme Court allows deportation for aiding car theft

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled Wednesday that an alien convicted for aiding and abetting a theft offense can be deported under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) [USCIS backgrounder]. In Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez [Duke Law case backgrounder], Luis Alexander Duenas-Alvarez, a legal permanent resident, pleaded guilty to the unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle in violation of California law - Cal. Veh. Code Ann. §10851(a) [text] - and the Department of Homeland Security took steps to remove him from the country under the INA, specifically under 8 USC §1101(a)(43)(G) [text]. The immigration judge hearing the case and the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed Duenas-Alvarez's appeal, but the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit disagreed [opinion text] in light of its recent decision in Penuliar v. Ashcroft [PDF text], where the Ninth Circuit held that violating §10851(a) of the California Vehicle Code is not a theft offense under the INA.

The Supreme Court vacated the lower court decision, concluding that the Ninth Circuit "erred" in "holding that 'aiding and abetting' a theft is not itself a crime that falls within the generic definition of theft." Read the Court's opinion per Justice Breyer, along with a concurrence in part and dissent in part [text] per Justice Stevens. AP has more.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.