 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, January 30, 2007 |
 |
|


Federal appeals court reinstates Padilla conspiracy charge
Lisl Brunner on January 30, 2007 4:17 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit [official website] reinstated a conspiracy charge [PDF opinion] against alleged terrorist Jose Padilla [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] Tuesday, reversing a lower court decision [JURIST report] that the charge duplicated the other two counts against Padilla and his two co-defendants. The reinstated charge, conspiracy to "murder, kidnap and maim persons in a foreign country," carries a maximum sentence of life in prison, unlike the other two charges [JURIST report]. The court rejected the argument that the charges were multiplicitous and in violation of the US Constitution's double jeopardy clause [LII backgrounder], holding that different proof was required to establish each count. Judge Gerald Bard Tjoflat said in his opinion: "While these three charges are interrelated, they are not interdependent," as Padilla could theoretically be found to have violated the statutes of one count without having violated statutes of the others. AP has more.
US authorities initially suspected Padilla, a US citizen, of planning to set off a radioactive "dirty bomb" in the United States and classified him in 2002 as an enemy combatant [JURIST news archive] subject to indefinite detention. Padilla was later indicted [JURIST report] in 2005 on unrelated terrorism charges. He was transferred to civilian custody [JURIST report] in January 2006 and subsequently pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to the charges. His trial is scheduled to begin April 16.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN rights investigator says torture routine in Jordan
Katerina Ossenova on January 30, 2007 1:20 PM ET

[JURIST] UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Manfred Nowak [official profile, DOC; JURIST news archive] said Tuesday that torture is systematic and widespread in Jordan, especially when used to elicit confessions from suspected terrorists. Nowak found the practice of torture [JURIST news archive] to be routine at the General Intelligence Directorate (GID) [official website], the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of the Public Security Directorate, as well as Al-Jafr Correction and Rehabilitation Centre. According to Nowak, practices such as beatings with truncheons, batons, electrical cables and broom handles, burning detainees with cigarettes and forcing them to hold painful positions are accepted torture methods in detention centers. Nowak called on the Jordanian government to investigate and prosecute all claims of torture and to amend domestic laws and the constitution in order to ban torture. The UN Human Rights Council [official website] also plans to review Nowak's report. Reuters has more.
In June 2006, Nowak recommended [JURIST report] that Jordan criminalize torture and end the use of special courts that protect accused police and intelligence officials, following the conclusion of his two-day visit to Jordan [JURIST news archive]. At that time, he also found evidence that torture is systematically practiced at the two detention centers in Amman run by the GID and the CID as well as Al-Jafr prison, but he claimed that officials at both centers obstructed his investigation through denying access to areas of the prison and hiding evidence.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Specter re-introduces bill to allow cameras in Supreme Court
Katerina Ossenova on January 30, 2007 12:51 PM ET

[JURIST] US Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website; JURIST news archive] re-introduced a bill [S.344 summary] Monday which would allow US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] proceedings to be televised, "unless the Court decides, by a vote of the majority of justices, that allowing such coverage in a particular case would constitute a violation of the due process rights of one or more of the parties before the Court." Specter said [press release]: The Supreme Court makes pronouncements on Constitutional and federal law that have direct impacts on the rights of Americans. Those rights would be substantially enhanced by televising the oral arguments of the Court so that the public can see and hear the issues presented. With this information, the public would have insight into key issues and be better equipped to understand the impact of and reasons for the Courts decisions. Specter's previous legislation was approved [JURIST report] by the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] in March 2006 while he was serving as Committee chairman but did not get to the Senate floor.
Although Chief Justice John Roberts said during his confirmation hearings in 2005 that he would remain open-minded on the question of cameras in courts, other justices, including Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and David Souter have spoken publicly against allowing cameras [AP report] in the Supreme Court itself, arguing that the Court's decisional process is on paper and suggesting that court proceedings should not be considered "entertainment." Specter's co-sponsors on the new bill include Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA), John Cornyn (R-TX), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Russ Feingold (D-WI).


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush executive order places White House watchdogs in federal agencies
Brett Murphy on January 30, 2007 12:24 PM ET

[JURIST] US President Bush has signed an executive order [text] that places a White House-appointed policy administrator in all federal agencies responsible for developing and enforcing public health and safety, environmental, and civil rights policy. Under the order, which will affect groups such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration [official websites], a regulatory policy office will be placed in each agency to supervise and report to the White House the development of regulations. Jeffrey Rosen, General Counsel of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) [official website], told the New York Times that the measures are a "classic good-government measure" designed to increase transparency and accountability. Critics of the order accuse the President of overreaching, and say that the measure will only slow the implementation of rules that protect the public.
Bush issued the order in light of his nomination of Susan Dudley [George Mason University profile], whose initiatives are written into the directive, to the position of administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the OMB. The Senate failed to confirm Dudley earlier this month, but Bush may push the nomination through while the Senate is in recess. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Argentina judge says Peron extradition could take over a year
Holly Manges Jones on January 30, 2007 8:15 AM ET

[JURIST] Argentinean Federal Judge Norberto Oyarbide said Monday that extraditing former Argentine President Isabel Peron [Wikipedia profile] from Spain could take more than a year, if it ever happens at all. Argentinean authorities are seeking Peron's return to Argentina [JURIST news archive] for questioning about the Argentine Anti-Communist Alliance (Triple A) [MIPT backgrounder], a government-supported death squad. Oyarbide said if Spain refuses to extradite Peron, he will push for a trial in Spain as authorized by a treaty signed by the two countries. In 1997, Person testified that she remembered approving a law authorizing the "annihilation" of leftist guerrillas, but could not recall specific details.
Isabel Peron assumed the presidency of Argentina in 1974 after the death of her husband, President Juan Domingo Peron, and was ousted by a military junta in 1976. Earlier this month, Peron was arrested [JURIST report] in Spain [JURIST news archive] under an arrest warrant issued by an Argentinean judge, but was later given a provisional release because the Spanish authorities do not believe the 75-year-old Peron will be able to flee due to her poor health. The renewed attempts to extradite Peron began after amnesty laws were overturned [JURIST report] in the country in 2005 and the government began its subsequent campaign to prosecute the human rights violations of the country's infamous "Dirty War" [GlobalSecurity backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. These investigations have been expanded to include the tenure of Peron [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|