 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, January 16, 2007 |
 |
|


Former UN Oil-for-Food chief indicted in US on bribery, fraud charges
Bernard Hibbitts on January 16, 2007 10:43 PM ET

[JURIST] The former head of the tarnished UN Oil-for-Food Program [official website; JURIST news archive] was indicted [press release, PDF] by US federal prosecutors in New York Tuesday on charges of bribery and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Benon Sevan [BBC profile] resigned from his post last year and fled to his native Cyprus, from where he is unlikely to be extradited [JURIST report]. The indictment alleges that Sevan took some $160,000 from the brother of then UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali as a bribe from the Iraqi government. Sevan, through his lawyer, has denied the charges. Reuters has more.
The UN Oil-for-Food program was designed to allow the Iraqi government of Saddam Hussein, under UN sanctions in the wake of its invasion of Kuwait and the first Gulf War, to sell limited stocks of oil in return for foodstuffs and other humanitarian supplies. The program was abused, however, and Saddam's regime sold oil on the black market and bribed foreign officials and commercial interests to allow this, embezzling over $1 billion in Program funds and perhaps as much another $10 billion from other sources. The allegations against Sevan were initially made public [JURIST report] in August 2005 in an interim report of the independent commission of inquiry led by former US Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, although the Manhattan US Attorney's office had already launched its own investigation [JURIST report] into Sevan's conduct on the strength of allegations made by a US Senate committee [JURIST report], among others. Sevan had been suspended from his post [JURIST report] by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan in February of that year, but he formally resigned just before [JURIST report] the findings of the report were announced.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

French lower house passes bill allowing presidential impeachment
Bernard Hibbitts on January 16, 2007 9:03 PM ET

[JURIST] The French National Assembly [official website, in French], the lower house of the French parliament, passed by voice vote Tuesday a bill [text and materials, in French] authorizing the impeachment of a French president but otherwise conferring legal immunity on the person holding that office during his or her term. The bill had languished in parliament after being approved by the French cabinet three years ago; it comes forward as current President Jacques Chrirac approaches the end of his second term with a number of corruption cases [JURIST news archive] still looming over him. The bill does not extend immunity to a president after his term has expired, however.
The bill has drawn the support of presidential candidate Segolene Royale [campaign website, in French], three members of whose Socialist Party unsuccessfully tried to impeach Chirac [BBC report] in 2001, but her leading rival, conservative Interior Minister Nicholas Sarkozy [campaign website, in French] has not taken a public position on it. The legislation must now go to the Senate [official website, in French] and then - because it would change the French Constitution - to a special joint session of the French parliament expected in late February. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court hears arguments in insurance, bankruptcy cases
Alexis Unkovic on January 16, 2007 7:25 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Tuesday in the consolidated cases of Safeco Insurance v. Burr and GEICO General Insurance v. Edo [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], 06-00084 and 06-00100, cases in which plaintiffs claim the insurance companies GEICO [corporate website] and Safeco [corporate website] breached the dictates of the Fair Credit Reporting Act [text, PDF] when they failed to notify customers that poor credit reports were the reason they had been denied favorable rate coverage. The case is on appeal from the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals [official website] which held [opinion, PDF] in January 2006 that the requisite state of mind the plaintiffs must prove to establish a violation of the act is reckless disregard, while defendants urged the standard of knowledge would be more appropriate. Justice Samuel Alito [JURIST news archive] indicated at argument that he did not favor the notification requirements urged by plaintiffs. AP has more.
Also on Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in Travelers Casualty v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], 05-01429, a case which addresses whether a creditor in a federal bankruptcy case can recover the costs of attorneys fees. The issue turns on whether the Supreme Court is willing to overturn the "Fobian Rule" established by the Ninth Circuit in the 1991 case of Fobian v. Western Farm Credit Bureau in which the court held that the federal bankruptcy law did not authorize the recovery of attorneys fees. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg [OYEZ profile] and Anthony Kennedy [OYEZ profile] hinted they may be willing to abandon the Fobian precedent. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Second Argentina judge issues arrest warrant for ex-president Peron
Ryan Olden on January 16, 2007 7:06 PM ET

[JURIST] Argentine Federal Judge Norberto Oyarbide issued a second international arrest warrant on Tuesday for former Argentine President Isabel Peron [Wikipedia profile], currently living in exile in Spain. The warrant demands that Peron be returned to Argentina [JURIST news archive] for questioning about the Argentine Anti-Communist Alliance [MIPT backgrounder] (Triple A), a government-supported death squad. Prosecutors in Argentina believe the Triple A was the brainchild of Jose Lopez Rega, Peron's minister of social welfare. The investigation was dropped after Rega's death in 1989 but has been revived after amnesty laws were overturned [JURIST report] in 2005 and the government began its subsequent campaign to prosecute the human rights violations of the country's infamous "Dirty War" [GlobalSecurity backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. These investigations have been expanded to include the tenure of Peron [JURIST report].
Isabel Peron, formally Maria Estela Martinez de Peron, assumed the presidency of Argentina in 1974 after the death of her husband, President Juan Domingo Peron. She was ousted by a military junta in 1976. Late last week, Peron was arrested [JURIST report] in Spain [JURIST news archive] under an arrest warrant issued by from another Argentine judge, Raul Acosta, who believes Peron signed three decrees in support of state terror including the disappearance of political opponent Hector Aldo Fagetti Gallego. She was later given a provisional release because the Spanish authorities do not believe the 75 year-old Peron will be able to flee due to her poor health. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

EU justice officials urge expansion of police data-sharing among member states
Brett Murphy on January 16, 2007 12:44 PM ET

[JURIST] EU law enforcement officials agreed Monday that a police data-sharing agreement among members states should be expanded to include all 27 member nations. German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble [Interior Ministry website] made the announcement at the end of two-day meeting of EU justice and interior ministers [overview, in German], the first during Germany's EU presidency [official website]. Schaeuble suggested that the EU and US could make a similar data-sharing agreement as part of a joint effort to combat terrorism, stating that "if we are talking about guaranteeing security...we wish to cooperate closely with our American partners."
The current EU agreement, signed in 2005 and known as the Schengen III Agreement [PDF text; Liberty and Security backgrounder], provides that seven EU nations - Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Spain - share police information from their respective fingerprint, DNA, and license plate databases. On Friday, Schaeuble called for greater EU-wide cooperation on illegal immigration [JURIST report]. Germany's presidency began in January and will conclude at the end of June. The European Presidency is responsible for the organization and chairing of all meetings in the Council of the European Union [official website], the EU's main decision-making body. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US law deans 'appalled' by Stimson criticism of law firms for representing detainees
Bernard Hibbitts on January 16, 2007 11:09 AM ET

[JURIST] More than 130 deans of US law schools [signatories list] signed a statement [text] released Monday expressing their dismay at comments [JURIST report] made last week by DOD Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs Charles "Cully" Stimson in a radio interview [recorded audio] critizing top US law firms for providing pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. "We," the deans wrote, are appalled by the January 11, 2007 statement of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Charles "Cully" Stimson, criticizing law firms for their pro bono representation of suspected terrorist detainees and encouraging corporate executives to force these law firms to choose between their pro bono and paying clients.
As law deans and professors, we find Secretary Stimsons statement to be contrary to basic tenets of American law. We teach our students that lawyers have a professional obligation to ensure that even the most despised and unpopular individuals and groups receive zealous and effective legal representation. Our American legal tradition has honored lawyers who, despite their personal beliefs, have zealously represented mass murderers, suspected terrorists, and Nazi marchers. At this moment in time, when our courts have endorsed the right of the Guantanamo detainees to be heard in courts of law, it is critical that qualified lawyers provide effective representation to these individuals. By doing so, these lawyers protect not only the rights of the detainees, but also our shared constitutional principles. In a free and democratic society, government officials should not encourage intimidation of or retaliation against lawyers who are fulfilling their pro bono obligations.
We urge the Administration promptly and unequivocally to repudiate Secretary Stimsons remarks. The statement was drafted and circulated by Dean Harold Hongju Koh of Yale Law School and Dean Emily A. Spieler of Northeastern University School of Law.
Stimson told Federal News Radio Thursday on the fifth anniversary of the US military prison that "when corporate CEOs see that those firms are representing the very terrorists who hit their bottom line in 2001 those CEO's are going to make those law firms choose between representing terrorists or representing reputable firms." The former Navy lawyer said "It's shocking...The major law firms in this country...are out there representing detainees." His comments drew immediate harsh criticism [JURIST comment] from lawyers representing some of the detainees, and the Pentagon quickly indicated that Stimson's comments "do not represent the views of the Defense Department or the thinking of its leadership." The Boston Globe has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|