 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, January 13, 2007 |
 |
|


Myanmar rights resolution vetoed by China, Russia at UN
Michael Sung on January 13, 2007 10:09 AM ET

[JURIST] China and Russia Friday vetoed a proposed UN Security Council [UN backgrounder] resolution [text and statements] demanding an end to political repression and human rights violations in Myanmar [JURIST news archive]. The resolution was jointly sponsored by the United States and Great Britain, but was blocked by the other two major powers on the grounds that it was outside the Council's jurisdiction, as they said Myanmar was not a threat to international peace. Acting US ambassador to the UN Alejandro Wolff [official profile] nonetheless characterized Myanmar as a "contemporary [threat] that the council and the international community needs to address before they become imminent...threats to international peace and security."
South Africa also voted against the resolution, with Indonesia, Qatar, and the Republic of Congo abstaining. China and Russia have consistently declined to support Security Council resolutions it perceives as encroachments to exclusive sovereignty in domestic affairs. In November, a UN committee denounced Myanmar [JURIST report] for continued human rights violations. Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, has been ruled by a military junta since 1988, which took power after crushing a democratic movement led by Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi [Nobel profile; BBC profile], who remains a political prisoner under house arrest. AP has more. The UN News Service has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge dismisses anthrax defamation suit against New York Times
Michael Sung on January 13, 2007 9:13 AM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Claude M. Hilton of the Eastern District of Virginia Friday granted a motion for dismissal made [JURIST report] by the New York Times in a defamation suit filed against the paper by Dr. Stephen J. Hatfill [Wikipedia profile], a former US Army germ-warfare researcher who was named a "person of interest" by the FBI [JURIST news archive] in its investigations of anthrax mailings [FBI backgrounder] shortly after the 2001 Sept. 11 attacks [JURIST news archive]. Hatfill sued [complaint] the Times for libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress after the newspaper published a story stating that the government's decision not to further pursue Hatfill as a suspect was the result of "poor investigation." The Times argued in its dismissal motion that as a public speaker on bioterror, Hatfill was a public figure and therefore had to prove the higher standard of defamation that requires "actual malice." The Times also contended that it did not attribute the attacks to Hatfill, but only reported the status of an ongoing government investigation. Hilton did not issue a detailed written opinion Friday, but that is expected in a few days.
Hatfill's previous suit against the Times and columnist Nicholas Kristof [NYT profile] were previously dismissed in the trial court, which ruled that the columns were an ongoing report about a government investigation and did not constitute libel. The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed [opinion text, PDF], ruling that a jury should decide that issue. In March, the Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari [JURIST report] in the case. Hatfill has also sued [complaint, PDF; JURIST report] the government for related claims. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|