 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, January 10, 2007 |
 |
|


Supreme Court hears arguments on union fees, public school funding
Jaime Jansen on January 10, 2007 6:42 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Wednesday in the consolidated cases Davenport v. Washington Education Association and Washington v. Washington Education Association [Duke Law Backgrounder], 05-1589 and 05-1657 [dockets], where the Court must decide whether a state campaign finance law that prohibits labor unions and their officials from seizing and using the wages of nonmembers for partisan political campaigns without obtaining the nonmembers' affirmative consent violates the First Amendment rights of labor unions. AP reports that Justice Kennedy and "at least five other judges" seemed to agree with Washington that states have wide discretion over how to protect the First Amendment rights of their citizens. After a state trial court ruled that a union had to ask permission of union members to use their dues for political activity under a Washington state law, a state appeals court reversed, saying the statute placed an undue burden on the union's right to free speech, and the Washington Supreme Court [official website] affirmed. AP has more.
Also Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. Department of Education [Duke Law case backgrounder], 05-1508 [docket], a case evaluating federal funding for public schools. Three New Mexico school districts allege that the US Department of Education [official website] wrongly uses an equalization public school funding formula distributing federal funds to public school districts equally, instead of an Impact Aid [DOE backgrounder] formula that allocates additional funds for school districts encompassing a significant amount of federal land, such as Indian reservations, that does not generate local tax revenue. The school districts, which have many native American students coming from reservations lands, argue that Congress did not grant the Department of Education authority to use the equalization formula in 1994 public school funding legislation, and that the Impact Aid formula from 1976 legislation remains in tact. The state and the federal government oppose using a different funding formula because it will disturb statewide funding. The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit [official website] last year favored the federal government. AP has more. The Cibola County Beacon has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court hears arguments on reinstating Padilla conspiracy charge
Joshua Pantesco on January 10, 2007 3:37 PM ET

[JURIST] A federal appeals court heard oral arguments Wednesday on whether the government should be permitted to reinstate a charge against alleged terrorist Jose Padilla [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. The charge, conspiracy to "murder, kidnap and maim persons in a foreign country," carries a maximum sentence of life in prison, unlike the other charges [JURIST report] now against him. In August, US District Judge Marcia Cooke dismissed the charge [JURIST report] as multiplicious, thus violating the Double Jeopardy Clause [LII backgrounder] of the Fifth Amendment. Federal prosecutors argued before the three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit that Cooke incorrectly applied the Double Jeopardy analysis.
Padilla, initially suspected of planning to set off a radioactive "dirty bomb" NRC factsheet] in the United States and long detained in a Charleston military brig as an "enemy combatant," was finally charged [JURIST report] in November 2005 on unrelated terrorism counts. He was transferred to civilian custody [JURIST report] in January of this year, when he pleaded not guilty [JURIST report]. His trial is scheduled to begin [JURIST report] January 22, but Cooke has said she will not resume trial until the Eleventh Circuit resolves the Double Jeopardy issue. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US soldier diagnosed as homicidal threat before Mahmudiya rape-murder
Joshua Pantesco on January 10, 2007 11:27 AM ET

[JURIST] US military mental health workers had diagnosed an Army soldier as a homicidal threat three months before he was involved in the alleged rape and murder of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl [JURIST news archive] and the murder of her family in the Mahmudiya (also "Mahmoudiya") area in March 2006, AP reported Tuesday. Former US Army soldier Pfc. Steven D. Green [JURIST news archive], who has pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to rape and murder charges, had sought treatment from an Army Combat Stress Team in Iraq in December 2005, complaining that he was angry about the war and that he felt driven to kill Iraqis to avenge the deaths of fellow soldiers. He was prescribed Seroquel, a mood regulator, and told to get some sleep, before he reported to duty the next day at a notoriously violent post in South Baghdad.
Green pleaded not guilty in November in his home state of Kentucky to the rape and murder allegations, where he faces a civilian trial in federal court. Green was discharged from the military before the Mahmoudiya allegations surfaced due to a diagnosed personality disorder. Another member of Green's 101st Airborne Division [official website], Spc. James P. Barker, pleaded guilty [JURIST report] in November to his role in the incident, and testified that he and other members of the Division were involved with the rape of the girl, while Green raped then shot her, after shooting her father, mother, and sister. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Guantanamo condemned on eve of fifth anniversary
Joshua Pantesco on January 10, 2007 10:42 AM ET

[JURIST] The US military prison for terror suspects at Guantanano Bay, Cuba [JURIST news archive] drew renewed criticism from rights defenders Tuesday as the camp approached the fifth anniversary of the arrival of the first detainees from Afghanistan. Terry Davis [CV], Secretary General of the Council of Europe [official profile], the European rights watchdog organization, called [text] Tuesday for all the mostly uncharged detainees to be tried in courts of law: If individuals are suspected of terrorist activities, they should be properly tried in a court of law- if not, they should be released, and the detention camp, set up five years ago this Thursday, should be immediately closed down...If we want to defeat terrorists, we must remain faithful to our ideas and values...We cannot win the war against terror with secret prisons, with torture, with inhuman and degrading treatment, with people being kept in a legal limbo and deprived of safeguards which are the foundation of our systems of justice and our democracies. These methods are exactly what terrorists want. They want us to give up the most fundamental, defining features of our freedom... Also on Tuesday, a group of activists set out to demonstrate in front of the gates of Guantanamo Bay. The group includes former detainee Asif Iqbal [Wikipedia profile], who told a press conference Tuesday that "Everyone [held at Guantanamo] has basically been labeled a terrorist and guilty." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush lifts moratorium on drilling in parts of Alaska, Gulf of Mexico
Joe Shaulis on January 10, 2007 8:08 AM ET

[JURIST] President Bush has cleared the way for drilling of oil and natural gas in parts of Bristol Bay, Alaska, and the central Gulf of Mexico [US Interior Dept. maps, PDF]. In a memorandum [text] to the secretary of interior dated Tuesday, Bush modified a moratorium [US Minerals Management Service fact sheet, PDF] that President Clinton imposed in 1998, forbidding drilling leases in those areas through 2012. In a press release [text], Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said that "[t]ogether, these actions will enhance America's energy security by improving opportunities for domestic energy production, and will also increase the revenues that the federal government collects from oil and gas companies on behalf of American taxpayers." The secretary said both areas would undergo "thorough environmental reviews," including public comment and an environmental impact statement, and noted that new leases for deep-water oil and gas drilling will carry a royalty rate of 16.7 percent, rather than 12.5 percent.
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin welcomed the lifting of the Bristol Bay moratorium, a move that had been sought by the previous governor and other local politicians. "If we can be sure it will not threaten the fisheries that are the foundation of the region's economy and way of life, I'm all for it," she said in a press release [text]. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) [advocacy website], meanwhile, was among environmental groups that lamented the change. "I am very disappointed with the president's action today. Bristol Bay should be off the table for drilling," WWF managing director Bill Eichbaum said in a press release [text]. He pledged that WWF would work to resurrect a congressional moratorium on drilling in Bristol Bay, which was in place from 1990 until its expiration in 2004.
Under a provision of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act [text; backgrounder], the president may withdraw from leasing any parts of the outer Continental Shelf [MMS backgrounder], as Clinton did. Congress sanctioned drilling leases in the Gulf late last year when it considered the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act [JURIST report], which was signed by President Bush. According to the Interior Department, a final environmental impact statement on oil and gas leases for 2007-2012 is expected in the spring. AP has more. Environmental News Service has additional coverage. The Anchorage Daily News has local coverage.
This report was prepared in partnership with the Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US soldier pleads guilty in Samarra Iraqi detainee deaths case
Ryan Olden on January 10, 2007 7:42 AM ET

[JURIST] US Army Spc. Juston R. Graber pleaded guilty Tuesday to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in connection with the deaths of three Iraqi detainees in Thar Thar, a town near Samarra, some 60 miles north of Baghdad, but pleaded not guilty to more serious charges [JURIST report] of attempted premeditated murder and conspiracy to commit premeditated murder. Graber, of the Third Brigade Combat Team of the 101st Airborne Division [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], will be required to testify against other soldiers implicated in the incident under the plea agreement [Reuters report]. Graber told the Fort Campbell [official website] military judge presiding over the court-martial proceedings that he knew his actions were unlawful.
Pfc. Corey R. Clagett, Spc. William B. Hunsaker and Staff Sgt. Raymond L. Girouard, still face courts-martial [JURIST report] for premeditated murder [JURIST report], attempted murder, and conspiracy for allegedly shooting three Iraqi men as they fled from a raid on a suspected insurgent stronghold in Thar Thar. Graber said Tuesday that after helping to secure the area, he returned to the helicopter for a body bag. He claims to have then heard gunshots and returned to the scene whereupon he saw three men on the ground. Graber admits to then shooting one of the wounded men in order to put him "out of his misery." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|