A Collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court upholds California death penalty jury instruction

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday upheld California's "catch-all" jury instruction for death penalty cases, ruling that the instructions provide adequate opportunity for jurors to weigh evidence that favors the defendant. In a 5-4 decision in Ayers v. Belmontes [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], the Court reinstated Belmontes' conviction for first degree murder in the killing of a 19 year old woman during a burglary. Belmontes had appealed his death penalty sentence, arguing that the jury instructions did not require the jury to consider all mitigating factors, including his probable future conduct in prison. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated the sentence [opinion, PDF] and California prosecutors appealed to have his sentence reinstated.

Read the Court's majority opinion [text] per Justice Kennedy, along with a concurrence [text] from Justice Scalia and a dissent [text] from Justice Stevens. AP has more. SCOTUSblog has additional coverage.

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.