 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, November 11, 2006 |
 |
|


US vetoes UN resolution urging Israel to respect international humanitarian law in Gaza
Caitlin Price on November 11, 2006 4:21 PM ET

[JURIST] The United States Saturday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution [draft text and explanations] condemning an Israeli attack on Beit Hanoun [BBC report] in the Gaza Strip on November 8 that resulted in the deaths of at least 18 civilians and calling on Israel "to scrupulously abide by its obligations and responsibilities under the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949." The same text called on the Palestinian Authority to "take immediate and sustained action to bring an end to violence, including the firing of rockets on Israeli territory" and requested that the UN Secretary-General establish a fact-finding mission to investigate the incident. The Council vote was 10 in favor, 1 against, with the United Kingdom, Denmark, Japan, and Slovakia abstaining. The US delegation said the resolution was one-sided and that Israel had in any event admitted that the attack was a mistake [Haaretz report].
On Friday, French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy [official profile] spoke out against what he called Israel's violations of international humanitarian law in the incident in an interview with Egypt's Al-Ahram. Douste-Blazy emphasized that Israel's right to defend itself must comply with the guidelines of international humanitarian law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention [text] on civilian protection. The International Committee of the Red Cross previously deplored the attack [press release], noting that "[i]nternational humanitarian law strictly prohibits attacks against civilians and civilian objects and requires that a strict distinction be made between the civilian population and military objectives." AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

British legislators consider broadening hate crimes law after BNP acquittals
Geoff Leung on November 11, 2006 10:10 AM ET

[JURIST] UK Chancellor Gordon Brown [official profile] called for broader race hate laws after a British jury Friday acquitted [JURIST report] two British National Party [official party website] (BNP) members Friday of inciting racial hatred. The charges stemmed from 2004 speeches in West Yorkshire, taped by the BBC, in which BNP leader Nick Griffin [BBC profile] calling Islam a "wicked, vicious faith" and senior aide Mark Collett [Wikipedia profile] referred to those seeking asylum as "a little bit like cockroaches." In February, the two men were cleared of similar charges, but the jury failed to reach a verdict on all charges [BBC report], which led to a second trial [JURIST report].
Also speaking in response to the acquittals, UK Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer told BBC Radio 4: "...we have got to demonstrate without compromising freedom that we are not [anti-Islam]." Liberal Democratic MP Evan Harris [personal website], however, warned that greater legislative restrictions could create "extremist martyrs." The 2006 Racial and Religious Hatred Act [text] makes it an offense to stir up hatred on religious grounds, but prosecutors must prove criminal intent rather than simply "recklessness." BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|