 |
|

Legal news from Friday, November 3, 2006 |
 |
|


Thailand drops charges against Muslim protesters
Lisl Brunner on November 3, 2006 10:27 AM ET

[JURIST] The new government of Thailand [JURIST news archive] has dropped charges against 92 Muslim participants in a 2004 anti-government protest. The news comes a day after interim Prime Minister Chulanont Surayud [official website, BBC profile] apologized to Muslim leaders in the southern Pattani province for the former government's crackdown on an Islamic insurgency. Surayud, who came to power after a bloodless coup [JURIST report] in September led by commander Gen. Sonthi Boonyaratkalin, the highest-ranking Muslim in the Thai army, also confirmed that the new government will investigate human rights abuses [JURIST report] allegedly committed by the administration of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra [BBC profile].
The 92 Muslims were charged in 2004 with instigating public disorder and disobeying authorities in the protest, which resulted in 85 deaths. Nearly 2,000 people have died in sectarian violence in Thailand's southern region over the past three years. The Asian Human Rights Commission [advocacy group press release] praised the government's actions but called for the prosecutions of those responsible for killing the protesters. Meanwhile, the Working Group on Justice for Peace, which is representing the protesters, has said that it will continue to seek civil damages. The government of neighboring and predominantly-Muslim Malaysia has also praised Surayud [Bernama report] for his initiative, calling that a "step in the right direction." Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Citizenship proof required for US-born infant Medicaid recipients under new policy
James M Yoch Jr on November 3, 2006 10:07 AM ET

[JURIST] Medicaid [official website; JURIST news archive] assistance will be available to infants under the age of one year born in the US to illegal immigrants only if they have citizenship documentation, according to Bush administration officials quoted in the New York Times Friday. The new policy requires illegal immigrant parents to file an application with Medicaid and provide citizenship proof, such as a birth certificate or a hospital record. The administration claims that the new policy is mandated by the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) [text, PDF], which established strict requirements for proof of citizenship to prevent Medicaid fraud. Many health care professionals and immigrant rights activists have denounced the policy, asserting that it will impede children from receiving care at a crucial stage of development because illegal parents will be reluctant to apply for government documentation for fear of deportation. Under the old policy, which continued to be followed following the legislation's passage earlier this year, any child born in the US and satisfying the low-income requirements became entitled to health insurance from birth until one year of age.
The availability of Medicaid benefits to illegal immigrants has lately polarized the health care and political communities, forcing the balance of preventing fraud and high costs with providing care to low-income applicants. In July, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services exempted most elderly and disabled applicants [JURIST report] who previously applied for benefits from the proof of citizenship requirement under the DRA. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush flags judicial nominees in Republican electoral pitch
Kate Heneroty on November 3, 2006 7:46 AM ET

[JURIST] US President George W. Bush [JURIST news archive] urged voters at campaign rallies in Montana and Nevada Thursday to vote Republican so that the Senate can continue to confirm key judicial nominees "who will not legislate from the bench." Bush pointed to Chief Justice John Roberts [OYEZ profile; JURIST news archive] and Justice Samuel Alito [OYEZ profile; JURIST news archive] to the US Supreme Court as examples of "good judges" that have been approved by a Republican-controlled Senate. Roberts was confirmed to the US Supreme Court [JURIST report] last year, but a previous nomination to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was blocked by the Senate when it was controlled by Democrats.
In remarks [transcript] at a campaign rally in Nevada, Bush said: So when you cast your ballot on Tuesday, your vote will ... determine what kind of judges sit on federal benches around the United States. At this moment, there are about 50 vacancies on the federal bench, and so it's vital to maintain a Republican Senate, so we can confirm the men and women I have nominated. ...
Our record on judges is clear. With the support of [Republican senators], we have confirmed good judges to the district courts, the circuit courts, and the Supreme Court. And this country is better off with John Roberts and Sam Alito as members of the United States Supreme Court.
A vote for a Democrat senator in this state or in any state in which there's a senatorial election is a vote against highly-qualified judges like these. All you have to do is look at the records. When the Democrats held the Senate, they denied hearings to one-third of my nominees to the court of appeals. See, they've got a record. You can rest assured what's going to happen if the Democrats take over the Senate. When they lost the majority in 2002, they changed their tactics. Instead of not giving them hearings, they just simply filibustered them. They tried the same tactics when Sam Alito's Supreme Court nomination came before the Senate. More than half of Senate Democrats voted to filibuster him. When he finally got his vote, 44 Democrats voted no. ...
The same thing happened to John Roberts. When I nominated him for the D.C. Circuit, it took -- he had been denied a hearing when another President Bush named him. So he finally got his name up; he got in, and then the Senate finally confirmed him. I will just tell you this: If the Senate were controlled by Democrats, John Roberts would still be waiting for a hearing. ...
If you want good, sound, conservative judges who will not legislate from the bench, you send Republicans back to the United States Senate. Bush made similar statements [transcript] at an event earlier Thursday in Montana. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|