 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, October 29, 2006 |
 |
|


DOD official says some Guantanamo detainees may be imprisoned for life
Leslie Schulman on October 29, 2006 11:22 AM ET

[JURIST] More than 300 prisoners now held by the US at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] could remain there under US military detention for the rest of their lives, DOD Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs Charles "Cully" Stimson [profile] told Reuters during a routine visit to the base last week. Of the 435 prisoners currently held at the US military base in Cuba, some have been given permission by the Pentagon to return home [JURIST report], but the US claims the release process has been slowed by the refusal of other nations to accept Guantanamo prisoners [Washington Post report; JURIST report]. Reuters has more. Only ten detainees have so far been charged with offenses, although a top State Department official said earlier this month that up to 80 could be charged and tried [JURIST report] under the new US military commissions process.
At the same time, some countries appear to have dealt with former US detainees differently than US authorities might prefer. Last week, US officials learned of the release of 29 former Guantanamo Bay prisoners by the Saudi government to allow the suspects to take part in Ramadan. They were released temporarily, with instructions to return to jail by the end of October, but US officials worry the men will join up with extremist groups, rather than return voluntarily to detainment. The Baltimore Sun has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam Dujail verdict could be delayed again: Iraqi prosecutor
Michael Sung on October 29, 2006 10:46 AM ET

[JURIST] Jaafar al-Mussawi, chief prosecutor in the trial [BBC timeline] of Saddam Hussein [JURIST news archive] for crimes against humanity, said Sunday that the trial verdict could once again be delayed. The Iraqi High Tribunal [JURIST news archive] had postponed the original October 16 verdict [JURIST report] until at least November 5, but could now delay the announcement of the verdict for an additional two weeks. The chief prosecutor told AFP that the court needed additional time to review evidence and complete its findings. AFP has more.
Prosecutors sought the death penalty for Hussein [JURIST report] in June for allegedly killing, torturing and illegally detaining Dujail residents, including 148 Shiites [JURIST report]. Khalil al-Dulaimi, chief defense lawyer for Hussein, meanwhile warned against the execution of Hussein [AP report] Sunday, citing the potential reaction of escalating violence and civil war in Iraq. His comments echoed others [JURIST report] made earlier in the month by fellow Saddam defense team member Ramsey Clark, a former US Attorney General, who predicted that the execution of the former Iraqi dictator would lead to "catastrophic violence" and "total, unmitigated chaos." Also Sunday, Dulaimi announced the ending of a month-long boycott [JURIST news archive] of Hussein's genocide trial, which resumes on Monday. Hussein is facing genocide charges [JURIST news archive; BBC timeline] for allegedly killing 100,000 Kurds during the so-called "Anfal" campaigns [HRW backgrounder] in the late 1980s.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Halliburton subsidiary breaking US Iraq reconstruction rules: government report
Leslie Schulman on October 29, 2006 10:11 AM ET

[JURIST] Halliburton [JURIST news archive] subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. (KBR) has been violating a US Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) [official website] direction on classifying proprietary data by claiming protection for information normally in the public sphere, according to a report [text, PDF] issued Friday by Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen Jr. [official website]. Bowen wrote: The routine use of proprietary markings when the data marked is not internal contractor information . . . is an abuse of FAR procedures . . . The result is that information normally releasable to the public must be protected from public release just because the information gathered . . ., pursuant to KBRs contractual obligations, was marked as proprietary. In effect, KBR has turned FAR provisions designed to protect truly proprietary information and to enhance procurement competition . . . into a mechanism to prevent the government from releasing normally transparent information, thus potentially hindering competition and oversight. The report went on to disclose specific types of information being marked as proprietary in violation of FAR, including daily dining hall headcounts and reports on fuel issued by KBR to foreign embassies. Reuters has more.
KBR has a contract with the US military called LOGCAP [official website] to provide exclusive logistics support during Iraq reconstruction. After the report was issued, Army officials said they would modify LOGCAP to provide better guidance to KBR on the marking of information as "proprietary." In August, a KBR subcontractor settled Iraq fraud allegations [JURIST article] with the US government for $4 million.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Halliburton subsidiary breaking Iraq reconstruction rules: US report
Leslie Schulman on October 29, 2006 10:11 AM ET

[JURIST] Halliburton [JURIST news archive] subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. (KBR) has been violating a US Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) [official website] direction on classifying proprietary data by claiming protection for information normally in the public sphere, according to a report [text, PDF] issued Friday by Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen Jr. [official website]. Bowen wrote: The routine use of proprietary markings when the data marked is not internal contractor information . . . is an abuse of FAR procedures . . . The result is that information normally releasable to the public must be protected from public release just because the information gathered . . ., pursuant to KBRs contractual obligations, was marked as proprietary. In effect, KBR has turned FAR provisions designed to protect truly proprietary information and to enhance procurement competition . . . into a mechanism to prevent the government from releasing normally transparent information, thus potentially hindering competition and oversight. The report went on to disclose specific types of information being marked as proprietary in violation of FAR, including daily dining hall headcounts and reports on fuel issued by KBR to foreign embassies. Reuters has more.
KBR has a contract with the US military called LOGCAP [official website] to provide exclusive logistics support during Iraq reconstruction. After the report was issued, Army officials said they would modify LOGCAP to provide better guidance to KBR on the marking of information as "proprietary." In August, a KBR subcontractor settled Iraq fraud allegations [JURIST article] with the US government for $4 million.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|