 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, October 22, 2006 |
 |
|


UK chief justice says violating immigrants' rights will only fuel terror
Robert DeVries on October 22, 2006 11:14 AM ET

[JURIST] Britain's top judge has said that disregarding human rights will only breed resentment among immigrants to the UK and fuel support for terrorist efforts. In an address [text] delivered late last week at the University of Hertfordshire, Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips [BBC profile] endorsed the increasingly-controversial Human Rights Act [text; backgrounder; JURIST news archive], and stressed that the judiciary was not undermining the will of parliament by handing down adverse rulings against violating legislation, but rather was just doing its job. Phillips said: Since the Second World War we in Britain have welcomed to the United Kingdom millions of immigrants from all corners of the globe, many of them refugees from countries where human rights were not respected. It is essential that they, and their children and grandchildren, should be confident that their adopted country treats them without discrimination and with due respect for their human rights. If they feel that they are not being fairly treated, their consequent resentment will inevitably result in the growth of those who, actively or passively, are prepared to support the terrorists who are bent on destroying the fabric of our society. The Human Rights Act is not merely their safeguard, it is a vital part of the foundation of our fight against terrorism. Relations between the British government and judiciary have become increasingly strained since the July 2005 London bombings, with Labour Party politicians from Prime Minister Tony Blair [JURIST report] on down publicly taking judges to task for compromising government anti-terror laws in various ways. Several senior judges and lawyers have fired back, accusing the government of overstepping its bounds. Blair and Phillips clashed over the issue [JURIST report] late last year. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

California prisoner transfers to private out-of-state facilities to begin in November
Michael Sung on October 22, 2006 10:02 AM ET

[JURIST] California state corrections officials say that an emergency proclamation [JURIST report; text] by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger [official website] aimed at relieving prison overcrowding by transferring prisoners to out-of-state facilities is set for implementation next month. The program, intending to reduce the overcrowding of 172,000 inmates in facilities designed for about 100,000, is intended to relieve the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) [official website], which has been forced to house more than 15,000 inmates in gymnasiums and auditoriums. By March 2007 some 2,260 inmates will be transferred to facilities operated by Corrections Corp of America [corporate website] and The GEO Group, Inc [corporate website] in Arizona, Indiana, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. A spokesperson for the CDCR said that the measures were cost-effective, as California is expected to pay private companies $63 dollars a day for each inmate, cheaper than the costs of housing them in California.
The CDCR estimated in early-October that without the emergency measures, it will run out of beds as early as June 2007. The measures are expected to free up space until June 2008, which will give the state legislature time to consider proposals to construct more prison cells or reduce the inmate population. California's prison system [JURIST news archive] has come under increased scrutiny after racially motivated riots broke out [JURIST report] earlier this year. The riot prompted a federal judge to order the establishment of an expert panel to help facilitate California prison reform [CDCR backgrounder]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|