 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, October 10, 2006 |
 |
|


Nigerian VP charged with corruption
Gabriel Haboubi on October 10, 2006 9:19 PM ET

[JURIST] Nigerian Vice-President Atiku Abubakar [official profile; official website] was charged Tuesday with more than a dozen counts of corruption. The charges filed before the Code of Conduct Tribunal, a special corruption court that has the power to strip elected officials of immunity, were related to the alleged diversion of $125 million dollars of public money to private interests, as well as allegations of receiving more than $4.6 million dollars in bribes. Supposedly some $6 million dollars were diverted from a special petroleum fund to iGate [corporate website], a Louisville, Kentucky-based communications company, which tried to do business in Nigeria in 2004. US Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) [JURIST news archive] has been under investigation since March 2005 for allegedly taking bribes from that same company in return for using his position to help them.
While Abubakar has brushed off [Ajuba Daily Trust report] the charges as illegal, and is attempting to reject them on jurisdictional grounds, the tribunal has been effective before. In December, the Nigerian tribunal charged [JURIST report] Abubakars ally, Diepreye Alamieyeseigha, then governor of the oil-rich Bayelsa state [backgrounder], with corruption stemming from failure to declare properties and bank accounts. Alamieyeseigha has since been impeached.
Corruption has lately become a major political issue in Nigeria, with allegations [BBC report] being made both from and about senior political leaders. In 2004 Global Integrity, a DC based non-profit tracking governance and corruption trends, issued a report [text] ranking Nigeria 14th out of 25 countries, or "weak" on its Public Integrity Index. Nigeria's Economic and Financial Crimes Commission recently reported that 31 of 36 Nigerian state governors are currently under investigation for alleged corrupt practices [VOA report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ken Lay lawyers seek speedy erasure of criminal record
Gabriel Haboubi on October 10, 2006 7:28 PM ET

[JURIST] Lawyers representing the estate of former Enron [JURIST news archive] chairman Ken Lay [Houston Chronicle profile; JURIST news archive] have filed papers asking US District Judge Sim Lake [Houston Chronicle profile] to rule on a nearly two-month-old request to clear Lays record [JURIST news archive], dismissing his 2004 indictment [final redacted indictment, PDF] and subsequent conviction [JURIST report]. In 2004, the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in US v. Estate of Andrew Clyde Parsons [opinion text, WPD] that a defendants death during a pending appeal erases an entire case, as the defendant cannot challenge his conviction. Lay died [JURIST report] of heart disease on July 5 this year.
Prosecutors asked Lake to defer a ruling [JURIST report] on the erasure request until October 23, 2006, the date Lay was to be sentenced, so as to give time for Congress to pass new legislation that would preserve convictions despite a defendants death. In this weeks filing, Lay lawyer Samuel Buffone [profile] is seeking to expedite Lakes ruling on the grounds that Congress adjourned last Saturday with neither introduction nor passage of any such bills. If Lake approves the request, the government would be unable to seize ill-gotten cash and property through the criminal case, and would instead be forced to build a forfeiture case in civil courts. The Houston Chronicle has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Malvo pleads guilty in Maryland sniper cases
Brett Murphy on October 10, 2006 3:34 PM ET

[JURIST] Lee Boyd Malvo [BBC profile] pleaded guilty Tuesday to six Maryland murders that occurred during a three-week shooting spree [BBC backgrounder] in the Washington, DC area [WP map] in 2002. A sentencing hearing for the pleas will occur on November 6, when Malvo is expected to receive six life sentences. Maryland prosecutors say that Malvo is seeking a deal in which he would also plead guilty to other murders that took place during the shooting spree, including that of Pascal Charlot in the District of Columbia. Although Malvo has not been formally charged in connection with Charlot's death, pleading guilty to that would make him eligible to serve his sentence in the federal prison system, and not in Virginia, where he has been assigned since his 2003 conviction [CNN report] for the Falls Church, Virginia, shooting of FBI analyst Linda Franklin.
Malvo testified in May [JURIST report] in the second trial against fellow suspect and shooting mastermind John Allen Muhammad [BBC profile], saying that Muhammed planned to "terrorize" the nation. Malvo had refused to testify in Muhammad's first trial in Virginia, where Muhammad has already been sentenced to death [JURIST report] for one murder, citing Fifth Amendment protections. In the second trial, Muhammad was convicted and sentenced to six consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court hears indictment harmless error case
Katerina Ossenova on October 10, 2006 2:35 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Tuesday in United States v. Resendiz-Ponce [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], 05-998, a case that asks justices to decide whether leaving an element of a crime out of an indictment is harmless error. Juan Resendiz-Ponce was deported because of a kidnapping conviction but was subsequently convicted after attempting to re-enter the United States illegally from Mexico in 2003 with false identification. His second conviction was overturned [opinion, PDF] by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit because his indictment did not allege an overt act showing that he tried to enter the US. During arguments Tuesday, Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben conceded that more information should have been included in the indictment. He argued, however, that the conviction should be upheld since "such an error violates the Fifth Amendment, but it is harmless." Atmore Baggot, Resendiz-Ponce's lawyer, argued the government should be forced to correct indictment errors. Justice Samuel Alito said that he did not see any defect in the indictment. AP has more.
Also Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] in BP America Production Company v. Watson [Duke Law backgrounder, merit briefs], 05-669, where justices will decide whether a six-year statute of limitations on lawsuits to recover damages applies to agency enforcement actions. BP America [corporate website] sued the US Department of the Interior (DOI) [official website] to prevent the Minerals Management Service (MMS) [official website], the DOI agency that manages natural gas, oil and other mineral resources, from collecting methane gas royalties that were more than six years old. BP America is appealing the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision [opinion, PDF] which affirmed a district court ruling that the statute of limitations does not apply to MMS's administrative order.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|