Australia AG insists Hicks military trial will not hear evidence coerced by torture

[JURIST] The US military commission [JURIST news archive] expected to try Australian Guantanamo detainee David Hicks [JURIST news archive] will not allow evidence coerced through torture, Australian Attorney General Philip Ruddock [official website] told ABC News on Tuesday. Ruddock added that "sleep deprivation is ordinarily not regarded as torture," however, if a commission were to deem it as such, any evidence retrieved as a result of it will not be allowed. Ruddock aroused the ire [Age report] of human rights groups [AAP report], former POWs [Telegraph report] and anti-torture campaigners on Sunday when he said in another TV interview that sleep deprivation was merely "coercive" [Australian report] and that he didn't regard it as torture. Hicks has claimed [Amnesty profile] in an affidavit that in US custody he had been subjected to sleep deprivation "as a matter of policy."

Last week, Ruddock said that the Hicks trial probably will not commence this year [JURIST report] given that legislation setting up a revised US military commissions structure has only just been passed. In August, the US assured Australia that Hicks will not face the death penalty [JURIST report] in any new trial. Earlier that month, Ruddock stated that he would press for Hick's return [JURIST report] if the US process against him is not restarted by November. ABC News has more.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.