 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, September 2, 2006 |
 |
|


Death penalty recommended for US soldiers accused of murdering Iraqi detainees
Joshua Pantesco on September 2, 2006 3:24 PM ET

[JURIST] A US Army investigator has recommended that four US soldiers face the death penalty if they are convicted on charges of murdering Iraqi detainees [JURIST report] according to the Associated Press, which obtained a copy of the report Saturday. Lt. Col. James P. Daniel Jr. concluded that several aggravating factors contributed to the capital punishment recommendation. During an Article 32 hearing [JAG backgrounder; UCMJ text], prosecutors alleged that in a May 9 raid near Samarra in Iraq's Salahuddin province, the four soldiers - Sergeant Raymond Girouard, Specialist William Hunsaker, Pfc. Corey Clagett and Specialist Juston Graber - released several detainees only to shoot them as they fled. Prosecutors also alleged that Girouard stabbed Hunsaker to cover up the killings. Army officials must now decide whether the soldiers will face a court-martial, and if so, whether the death penalty will be requested.
The four soldiers from the Third Brigade Combat Team of the 101st Airborne Division [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] face charges of premeditated murder [JURIST report], attempted murder, and conspiracy, and could face the death penalty if convicted of premeditation. Clagett, Girouard and Hunsaker also face obstruction of justice charges for threatening to kill another soldier, Pfc. Bradley Mason, if he told investigators of their alleged plans for murdering the detainees. The soldiers argued that they followed the rules of engagement when they acted to prevent an escape attempt, and that they were ordered by their officers to "kill all military-aged males" in the raid. They have been held in Kuwait since their May arrests, and will likely be court-martialed at Fort Campbell. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Pennsylvania community delays enforcement of immigration law
Joshua Pantesco on September 2, 2006 10:00 AM ET

[JURIST] The city of Hazleton, Pennsylvania [official website] on Friday agreed to delay for 20 days [judicial order, PDF] enforcement of a tough new local law against illegal immigration while it rewrites the ordinance in an effort to bolster it against legal challenges. The law was challenged [JURIST report; complaint; ACLU materials] last month by the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania (ACLU) and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund (PRLDEF) [advocacy websites], which have argued that the federal government has exclusive power to regulate immigration [CRS study], and that the city law is discriminatory under the US Constitution. The parties agreed to the 20-day enforcement delay so that the plaintiffs have time to request a second injunction.
Hazleton's Illegal Immigration Relief Act [text, PDF; mayor's letter] punishes employers, landlords, and business merchants who employ, rent to, or sell products to illegal immigrants [JURIST news archive], and makes English the official language of Hazleton. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|