 |
|

Legal news from Monday, August 28, 2006 |
 |
|


Iran court sentences outspoken editor for publishing articles 'against constitution'
Jaime Jansen on August 28, 2006 4:13 PM ET

[JURIST] An Iranian court has sentenced the managing editor of the monthly Aftab, Isa Saharkhiz [Iran Press profile], to four years in jail and barred him from working in the press for five years after he was convicted of publishing articles against the constitution and offending the state media, according to ISNA [media website], the Iranian student news agency. Saharkhiz, a well-known press activist whose publications have been closed down in the past, said he had only heard about his sentence from news reports, but he would not appeal because Iran's judiciary was not independent. Reuters has more.
The Iranian government began a crackdown on independent media [JURIST report] earlier this year, prompting the Committee to Protect Journalists [advocacy website], to which Saharkhiz belongs, to condemn Iran's record [JURIST report] in its annual report [text] on media repression. Last week, a spokesman for the government of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad [official website; BBC profile] urged Iranian prosecutors to pursue charges [JURIST report] against several Iranian newspapers who have published articles accusing Ahmadinejad of financial wrongdoing.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Israel war conduct inquiry to include legal experts
Jeannie Shawl on August 28, 2006 3:38 PM ET

[JURIST] Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert [official website] said Monday that he will establish two inquiry committees [speech transcript] to investigate Israel's conduct during the latest crisis in the Middle East [JURIST news archive], one to examine "the functioning of the Government, its proceedings and decision making, and anything else it sees fit to examine," and an internal military investigation to "conduct a thorough examination in order to implement the necessary changes in the preparedness of the IDF, its combat doctrine and force structuring." The government committee of inquiry will be chaired by a former head of Israel's spy agency and will include legal and military experts.
Neither of the investigations will have the power to force witness testimony, disappointing critics who have called for an independent state inquiry. Olmert dismissed those calls Monday, saying "this will not repair the defects or prevent incidents." Olmert called an independent judicial investigation a "tempting" political solution, but said that it "is not what the country needs," favoring instead "an effective, professional inquiry, to examine the issues in depth, draw conclusions, and learn lessons." AP has more. Haaretz has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge rejects Florida third party registration law as unconstitutional
Jaime Jansen on August 28, 2006 3:12 PM ET

[JURIST] US District Judge Patricia Seitz of the Southern District of Florida [official website] on Monday threw out Florida's Third-Party Registration Law [text], which had imposed steeply scaled fines on organizations and volunteers who failed to submit voter applications within specified time periods. Seitz ruled [opinion text, PDF] that the law "unconstitutionally discriminates in favor of political parties by excluding them from the definition of 'third party voter registration organization'" and that the law's stiff fines are unconstitutional because they "chill...First Amendment speech and association rights."
Several labor unions had criticized the law [complaint, PDF], saying that it blocked voter registration drives because of a high financial risk, which imposed a $250 fine on organizations and volunteers that failed to submit voter applications within ten days of application, $500 if organizations and volunteers failed to submit applications by the registration deadline, and $5,000 if organizations and volunteers failed to submit the application altogether. Florida state officials said they would appeal the decision to the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The plaintiffs, which included the League of Women Voters of Florida, the Florida AFL-CIO, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees [advocacy websites] and other smaller groups, called Monday's ruling a "win for democracy." AP has more. The South Florida Sun-Sentinel has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Mexico election court rejects most fraud challenges in disputed presidential race
Jeannie Shawl on August 28, 2006 2:52 PM ET

[JURIST] Mexico's Federal Electoral Tribunal [official website, in Spanish] on Monday rejected most challenges to last month's disputed presidential election [JURIST report], dismissing the bulk of fraud allegations brought by leftist challenger Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador [campaign website, in Spanish]. Lopez Obrador filed over 200 separate complaints challenging the preliminary vote count [JURIST report] which conservative candidate Felipe Calderon [campaign website, in Spanish] won by just 0.6 percent of the vote. Lopez Obrador argued that fraudulent election practices [JURIST report] allowed Calderon to win the election, but the Mexican electoral court refused to order a full manual recount [JURIST report], instead ordering a recount of ballots at just nine percent of the nation's polling places.
Announcing the rulings Monday, Judge Jose Luna said that some results were overturned due to fraud, but that "all the parties lost a considerable amount of votes" and that the results were not affected by the changes. The court must still officially declare a winner and has until September 6 to do so. Lopez Obrador's party, the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) [party website, in Spanish], has already indicated they expected the court to rule against Lopez Obrador [JURIST report]. Party officials, however, plan to continue nonviolent protests [JURIST report] in Mexico City. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Jordan parliament passes contentious anti-terror bill
Joshua Pantesco on August 28, 2006 9:27 AM ET

[JURIST] Jordan's National Assembly [official website] on Sunday approved anti-terror legislation that opponents predict will unnecessarily curtail individual liberties. The bill, which will become law when signed by King Abdullah II [official website], is Jordan's first attempt to address terrorism [JURIST report] since the deadly Amman hotel bomb [CTV report] that killed 57 people in 2005. In May, the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood [party website; FAS backgrounder] criticized the bill [JURIST report] as a US-influenced bid to stifle Jordan's government reform movement and encourage the establishment of a police state in the country.
The law criminalizes a wide range of behavior as acts of terror, including financing, interacting with or recruiting for any terrorist group, and possessing, making, or transporting any material that can be used to produce chemical weapons. The law gives military courts sole jurisdiction over terrorism claims, and permits officials to conduct surveillance of terrorism suspects and bar suspects from leaving the country. A provision allowing the police to detain suspects for 30 days, at which point suspects must be either charged or released, has also prompted criticism from human rights groups. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|