 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, June 4, 2006 |
 |
|


ABA to investigate Bush signing statements
James M Yoch Jr on June 4, 2006 3:08 PM ET

[JURIST] The American Bar Association [profession website] Board of Governors [ABA backgrounder] voted unanimously Saturday to launch an inquiry into President Bush's frequent use of signing statements [1993 US DOJ backgrounder] to bypass new laws because of his interpretation of presidential and executive powers under the US Constitution. The President has used such statements some 750 times [Boston Globe report] since taking office in 2001. In January this year, he controversially reserved the right to bypass a ban on torture [JURIST report] when he signed the 2006 defense spending bill [JURIST report], prompting even top Republican leaders to criticize him [JURIST report].
The ABA has assembled a bipartisan task force of legal professionals and scholars, including former federal judges and Justice Department officials, to research whether Bush, who has appended more signing statements to bills than any other US president, has exceeded his constitutional authority and circumvented the system of checks and balances with the signing statements. The committee is expected to report its findings to the ABA's House of Delegates, which will decide whether to adopt the recommendations, in August. In February, the ABA adopted the findings of a similar task force [ABA Journal report] investigating the warrantless domestic surveillance program [JURIST news archive], which recommended [JURIST report] that Bush abide by the constitutional limitations placed on the president or work with Congress to enact new legislation if he believes current laws are inadequate. The Boston Globe has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraqi lawyer related to Haditha victims blasts $2,500 US 'compensation' payments
Alexis Unkovic on June 4, 2006 10:54 AM ET

[JURIST] An Iraqi lawyer related to several Iraqi civilians who were among the 24 allegedly killed by US Marines in Haditha [JURIST report] last November denounced the US military Saturday via videotape, claiming US "compensation money" of $2,500 per victim to the families of each casualty were insufficient. Khaled Salem Rsayef also claimed that during the initial meeting between the Haditha families and US military officials in November the two sides clashed as officers present told family members that the Haditha victims had been killed by an insurgent's roadside bomb, not gunfire from the US military. AP has more.
Iraqi lawyers and family members of Iraqi civilians killed or injured have previously expressed frustration [New Standard article] with the US compensation process [2003 DOD backgrounder; 2003 HRW backgrounder; OW/NADHRI report, PDF] for "wrongful death". Payments technically provided as "sympathy" or "solace" by local US commanders without admission of legal liability are limited to a maximum of $2,500 per individual, and under the US Foreign Claims Act [text] which authorizes payments, the US has no obligation to pay if a claim "did not arise from action by an enemy or result directly or indirectly from an act of the armed forces of the United States in combat." Claims for compensation in access of $50,000 are adjudicated by the US Army Claims Service [official website].
The Iraqi cabinet decided to launch its own probe into the Haditha killings Thursday, prompting new Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki [BBC profile] to announce [JURIST report] Friday that he will ask the US to turn over its files on the investigation.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|