 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, May 31, 2006 |
 |
|


Ex-Enron executive found guilty, another acquitted in broadband scheme trial
Joshua Pantesco on May 31, 2006 3:41 PM ET

[JURIST] A former Enron [JURIST news archive] broadband executive was found guilty Wednesday on one count of falsifying records and conspiracy and three counts of wire fraud, and another was acquitted on the same five charges, one year after their first trial ended in a hung jury [JURIST report]. Former CFO Kevin Howard, who was convicted, and senior accounting director Michael Krautz [Houston Chronicle profiles], who was acquitted, were re-indicted [JURIST report] in November on fewer charges stemming from allegations that they illegally put millions in profits on the books of Enron's broadband division by selling an interest in the future profits of a video-on-demand deal with Blockbuster Video that collapsed shortly afterwards.
Howard faces a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison. The original trial was split into three parts. The insider trading and money laundering trial of former VP Scott Yeager [Chronicle profile] is postponed pending an appeal, and the conspiracy, fraud and insider trading trial of former CEO Joseph Hirko and former senior VP Rex Shelby [Houston Chronicle profiles] is scheduled to begin on Sept. 5. The sentencing of former Enron executives Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, found guilty last week [JURIST report], is scheduled for Sept. 11. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Jordan anti-terror bill would create police state: Muslim Brotherhood
Joshua Pantesco on May 31, 2006 2:51 PM ET

[JURIST] A leader of the Islamic Action Front [party website], the political wing of the Muslim Brotherhood [official website; FAS backgrounder] in Jordan, Wednesday criticized Jordan's draft anti-terrorism legislation as an oppressive, US-influenced bid to stifle Jordan's government reform movement and encourage the establishment of a police state in the country. The bill, first proposed last November [JURIST report] in response to the deadly Amman hotel bomb [CTV report] that killed 57 people in 2005, was approved by the government last Sunday [UPI report], and will be presented to the Jordanian parliament [official website] in July for final approval. The Islamic Action Front currently holds 20 of Jordan's 84 parliamentary seats.
The law criminalizes a wide range of behavior as an acts of terror, including financing, interacting with or recruiting for any terrorist group, and possessing, making, or transporting any material that can be used to produce chemical weapons. The law has also been criticized by human rights groups for providing for indefinite detention of terrorist suspects, though UPI is reporting that the law as currently drafted only allows for detainees to be held for two weeks without being charged. UPI has more. The Jordan Times has local coverage of the legislation.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Beslan survivors to appeal hostage-taker guilty verdict
Joshua Pantesco on May 31, 2006 2:13 PM ET

[JURIST] A group of survivors of the September 2004 Beslan school siege [BBC backgrounder; MosNews report] in the Russia's North Ossetia republic announced Wednesday that they will appeal the guilty verdict [JURIST report] against Nurpashi Kulayev [Wikipedia profile], the sole surviving attacker, to the Russian Supreme Court [official website]. The survivors, part of the Voice of Beslan (Golos Beslan) [advocacy website, in Russian], told the Itar-Tass news agency that the verdict should be cancelled and the investigation resumed because "the court did not take into account all testimonies of the witnesses and did not determine the actual cause of the death of the majority of hostages."
The Voice of Beslan has previously complained that the government's role in the siege has not been properly investigated. Three Russian police officers have been indicted for criminal negligence [MosNews report] for failing to increase security during the beginning stages of the siege, and the government has been criticized for using heavy artillery before all hostages were rescued, and for failing to provide adequate medical support in the incident. Other victims are against the appeal, saying that the investigation must proceed independent of the Kulayev case.
Kulayev was sentenced to life in prison [JURIST report] last week for his role in the attacks, though prosecutors requested the death penalty [JURIST report], asking for a special reinstatement of capital punishment due to the extreme nature of the Beslan siege. Kulayev's lawyers have also announced their intention to appeal the verdict, saying their client is innocent of all charges and that no evidence was presented that implicates Kulayev. 317 hostages, including 186 children, were killed during the attack, and another 728 hostages were injured. Itar-Tass has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush promises punishment for any Marines who violated laws of war at Haditha
Joshua Pantesco on May 31, 2006 1:39 PM ET

[JURIST] US President George W. Bush on Wednesday publicly expressed concern about the alleged killings of 24 Iraqi civilians by US Marines [JURIST report] in the city of Haditha in November 2005, declaring that any soldiers found guilty would be punished. Asked about the incident at a White House photo op, Bush said: I am troubled by the initial news stories. I am mindful that there is a thorough investigation going on. If, in fact, the laws were broken, there will be punishment. I know this: I've talked to General Pete Pace about the subject, who is a proud Marine, and nobody is more concerned about these allegations than the Marine Corps. The Marine Corps is full of men and women who are honorable people who understand rules of war. And if, in fact, these allegations are true, the Marine Corps will work hard to make sure that that culture, that proud culture will be reinforced, and that those who violated the law, if they did, will be punished. While General Pace, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, refused to comment [JURIST report] on the ongoing US military investigation into the incident on Monday, an anonymous top DOD official told AP last Friday that it has already revealed evidence [JURIST report] suggesting that murder may have occurred. Following military briefings of the House and Senate leaders on the incident, Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) appeared [JURIST report] on ABC's This Week and described Haditha as "worse than Abu Ghraib" for the US, saying the killings had been committed "in cold blood."
The military's latest investigation was launched in March [JURIST report] after a TIME magazine report [text] alleged that the soldiers may have killed civilians without justification after a roadside bomb killed Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas. The soldiers may have violated the US law of war [UCMJ provisions] and the international law of armed conflict [ICRC materials] if they committed murder and/or failed to positively identify the enemy and determine whether there was hostile intent before firing on civilians. Read the full text of Bush's Wednesday appearance with President Kagame of Rwanda here.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Spanish court considers reopening Berlusconi corruption probe
Jaime Jansen on May 31, 2006 12:05 PM ET

[JURIST] A Spanish judge asked the Spanish Constitutional Court [official website, in Spanish] on Wednesday to reopen an investigation into corruption charges against former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi [official profile] stemming from Berlusconi's holdings in Spanish television channel Telecinco [corporate website, in Spanish], which Spanish prosecutors believe exceeded the 25 percent television channel ownership cap imposed by Spanish law. Prosecutors halted the proceedings, which began in the early 1990s, when Berlusconi became Italian prime minister and therefore gained immunity from prosecution. Berlusconi, who lost a parliamentary election against Romano Prodi in April, lost his right to immunity early in May when he officially resigned [JURIST report].
Spanish prosecutors allege that Berlusconi used offshore companies to garner more than 50 percent of Telecinco holdings, while committing tax fraud and breaching anit-trust laws. Berlusconi's eight business partners will begin a trial Monday on charges of tax and document fraud relating to their involvement with Berlusconi's business empire. In addition, Berlusconi is likely to face new corruption charges in Italy [JURIST report], where prosecutors accuse Berlusconi of bribing a former legal advisor to withold evidence relating to other corruption charges in the 1990s [BBC Q/A], including setting up offshore accounts for his holding company Fininvest [BBC report]. The Guardian has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Thailand court rejects election commission nominees in latest ouster bid
Jaime Jansen on May 31, 2006 11:19 AM ET

[JURIST] The Thailand Supreme Court on Wednesday stepped up its efforts to pressure Thailand's Election Commission (EC) [official website] to resign over failed parliamentary elections [BBC report] in April, which the Constitutional Court annulled [JURIST report] in early May, by rejecting two nominees to serve on the panel. Thailand's three principal courts have repeatedly called for the EC to resign [JURIST report] amid allegations that it favors the ruling Thai Rak Thai party [Wikipedia backgrounder]. In overturning the April election results, the Constitutional Court found that the EC unconstitutionally organized the parliamentary elections too soon after Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra [official website] dismissed parliament, leaving new candidates little time to prepare. The EC faces several lawsuits filed by the main opposition Democrat Party and other adversaries of Thaksin, who returned to power last week after a "political break," for favoring the Thaksin's Thai Rak Thai party.
The Supreme Court voted 72-4, in an unusual sitting of the entire court, to reject nominees to two empty seats on the EC. Thailand's Cabinet on Tuesday approved October 15 as the date for new elections, after the three principal courts initially rejected October 22 [JURIST reports]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK law reform panel proposes limited rights for cohabiting couples
Joshua Pantesco on May 31, 2006 11:02 AM ET

[JURIST] The Law Commission [official website], the independent legal reform body of the United Kingdom, has recommended creating limited legal rights for couples who live together but are unmarried, in a consultation paper [PDF text; overview, PDF] released Wednesday titled "Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown." The paper proposes that a limited category of unmarried couples be afforded legal remedies distinct from divorce remedies when the relationship ends. The paper suggests that when a same-sex or opposite-sex couple lives together for more than two years, or if they have a child together, the law should allow for a limited division of wealth when the couple separates. The paper also recommends that cohabitants be allowed to inherit when their cohabitant dies intestate, be afforded certain pension rights, and be allowed to enter into contracts providing for benefits upon separation. Under current UK law, cohabitants may claim maintenance payments for their child when their partner leaves, but not for themselves. Supporters of the proposals say reforms are needed, as the number of unmarried couples living together is expected to double in the next fifteen years. Critics fear the changes would undermine the institution of marriage.
The Law Commission is soliciting suggestions through September and will publish a final report next summer, but it does not plan to publish draft legislation. Last December, the UK opened civil partnership registrations [JURIST report] for same-sex couples under the Civil Partnership Act of 2004 [text]. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Canada legislation would set fixed election dates, limit Senate terms
Bernard Hibbitts on May 31, 2006 9:53 AM ET

[JURIST] The Conservative Party government of Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper introduced new legislation in the federal House of Commons Tuesday that would set fixed dates for regular federal elections [Privy Council Office backgrounder; Bill C-16 text] and would potentially limit members of the country's weak Senate [official website; CBC Senate reform backgrounder] to eight-year terms. Under the legislation, national elections would take place every four years on the third Monday in October, theoretically precluding the party in power from adjusting the election date short of the actual expiry of its mandate to its own electoral advantage. The fixed date would not, however, affect immediate election calls required after the fall of a government in a Commons vote. The Senate term limit will require a formal constitutional amendment to be effective; federal advisors say that the amendment could, however, be adopted by the federal Parliament without needing the consent of the provinces, generally required for changes affecting provincial power. The question is not entirely clear-cut, however, as Canadian senators are appointed on a regional basis under the Constitution Act [text], and the country's Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that changes affecting the essential character of the Senate must be approved by seven of the ten Canadian provinces representing 50% of the population.
The new Conservative proposals are part of a democratic reform [Harper speech transcript] package promised by Harper in January's federal election. More legislation is expected to follow. Canadian Press has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|