 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, May 11, 2006 |
 |
|


Kavanaugh judicial nomination moves to Senate floor after committee approval
Tom Henry on May 11, 2006 2:32 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday voted 10-8 along party lines to send the circuit court nomination of White House aide Brett Kavanaugh [White House backgrounder] to the full Senate for a confirmation vote. Kavanaugh, who has been nominated to the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, faced probing questions [JURIST report] from committee members during a hearing Tuesday, one day after the American Bar Association [group website] lowered its rating [JURIST report] of Kavanaugh from "well qualified" to "qualified" [ratings, PDF; White House response]. Though it appears unlikely that Democrats will attempt to filibuster Kavanaugh's nomination, they have been vocal in their opposition to what they see as a nomination to a lifetime court appointment that carries political overtones, as Kavanaugh is a key aide in the Bush administration.
A filibuster is more likely for two other Bush nominees currently in the pipeline however, Judge Terrence Boyle [US DOJ backgrounder] to the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and Michael B. Wallace [official profile] to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Boyle allegedly presided over cases during which he should have recused himself, including a case where he allegedly bought General Electric stock midway through presiding over a pension lawsuit against the company. Wallace has garnered criticism from Democrats and the NAACP [advocacy website] among others for working to secure tax exemptions for the then-segregated Bob Jones University and also working with US Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS) to require that plaintiffs in voting rights cases prove an intent to discriminate, rather than simply the effects of discrimination. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Senate leaders announce plan to resume immigration reform debate
Joshua Pantesco on May 11, 2006 2:13 PM ET

[JURIST] US Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) [official website] and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) [official website] on Thursday announced [Frist press release; Reid press release] a bipartisan agreement to resume debate next week on immigration reform, which also covers the 14 Republicans and 12 Democrats who will negotiate a compromise proposal with the House of Representatives. Last December, the House passed [JURIST report] the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act [PDF text; bill summary], a strict immigration control act that focuses on law enforcement by making unlawful presence in the US a felony subject to deportation, and could punish humanitarian groups aiding the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants currently in the US.
Debate on the Senate version of the legislation, S 2454 [summary] stalled [JURIST report] last month, but earlier this week senators indicated they had tentatively agreed [JURIST report] to toughen rules on the hiring of illegal immigrants by forcing employers to check Social Security numbers and investigate the immigration status of potential employees. Frist said Thursday that Senate debate on the immigration reform bill [JURIST news archive], will resume next week and will focus on a "considerable" number of amendments. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush defends domestic surveillance amid claims NSA collecting US phone records
Tom Henry on May 11, 2006 2:13 PM ET

[JURIST] US President George W. Bush on Thursday insisted that "the privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected" as the government conducts anti-terrorist surveillance in the US. Bush's comments [transcript] were in response to a report [text] in Thursday's USA Today that calling patterns of millions of Americans are being collected and examined [JURIST report] by the National Security Agency (NSA) [official website], but he did not directly confirm or deny the allegations. Bush said: Today there are new claims about other ways we are tracking down al Qaeda to prevent attacks on America. I want to make some important points about what the government is doing and what the government is not doing.
First, our international activities strictly target al Qaeda and their known affiliates. Al Qaeda is our enemy, and we want to know their plans. Second, the government does not listen to domestic phone calls without court approval. Third, the intelligence activities I authorized are lawful and have been briefed to appropriate members of Congress, both Republican and Democrat. Fourth, the privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities.
We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans. Our efforts are focused on links to al Qaeda and their known affiliates. So far we've been very successful in preventing another attack on our soil.
As a general matter, every time sensitive intelligence is leaked, it hurts our ability to defeat this enemy. Our most important job is to protect the American people from another attack, and we will do so within the laws of our country. Also Thursday, US Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said that he would call on the phone companies [Reuters report] implicated in the USA Today Report - AT&T, Verizon and Bell South - to provide information to the committee on the allegations.
This newest revelation into the NSA's domestic spying program [JURIST news archive] could disrupt Bush's attempt to win confirmation for former NSA director General Michael Hayden [official profile] as the new CIA director, though Hayden has suggested [JURIST report] that he might welcome a modification to the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act [text] to bring the wiretapping surveillance program under its scope of authority. CBS News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Libya judge adjourns Bulgaria nurses AIDS retrial after denying bail
Joshua Pantesco on May 11, 2006 1:50 PM ET

[JURIST] The Libyan retrial of five Bulgarian nurses [JURIST report] accused of infecting over 400 patients, primarily children, with the HIV virus, resumed on Thursday morning in Tripoli before being adjourned for procedural reasons until June 13. Prosecutors objected to defense lawyer Othman al-Bizanti's motion for the medics to be released on bail and presiding Judge Mahmud Huwaissa ruled [Guardian report] that they will be detained until the trial resumes. Dimitar Tsanchev, a spokesman for the Bulgarian Foreign Ministry, urged the court to resume the trial as quickly as possible. The six defendants had been sentenced to death by firing squad before Libya's Supreme Court overturned [JURIST report] the convictions [JURIST report] in dramatic fashion on Christmas Day 2005 and ordered a retrial.
Last month, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pressed the Libyan government [JURIST report] to release the captive nurses, saying, "this is a humanitarian case and it is time for them to come home." Tension has mounted between Bulgaria and Libya over the situation. Tripoli has hinted that the nurses could be released if a group of international donors pays compensation to the families of the victims. The families of the victims are demanding $10 million for each child allegedly victimized by the nurses, an amount equal to the compensation paid by Libya to the families of the 270 victims of the 1988 Pan Am terrorist bombing over Scotland [BBC backgrounder]. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Colombia high court legalizes exceptions to abortion law
Tom Henry on May 11, 2006 9:31 AM ET

[JURIST] The Constitutional Court of Colombia [official website; government backgrounder, in Spanish] has handed down a decision [WLW press release, PDF] legalizing exceptions to the country's abortion ban in cases of rape, incest and if the life of the mother or fetus is in danger. Before Wednesday's ruling, women undergoing an abortion procedure and doctors performing the procedure could be criminally charged and sentenced to jail time, although the punishment for abortions necessitated by rape were less harsh. Colombian President Alvaro Uribe Velez [BBC profile] has expressed concern that women will seek out abortions when the exceptions do not apply. Uribe faces a presidential contest later this month against opponents who support broader abortion rights in the mostly Roman Catholic country, where an estimated 400,000 illegal abortions are performed annually.
Women's Link Worldwide (WLW) [advocacy website] first filed the constitutional challenge to the abortion law in April 2005, with Human Rights Watch filing an amicus brief [text, in Spanish]. The court dismissed the challenge on procedural grounds, but quickly accepted an amended complaint upon which it made its decision. El Salvador and Chile are now the only countries in Latin America with a complete ban on abortion [JURIST news archive]. AP has more. From Medellin, El Mundo has local coverage, in Spanish.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US dismisses UK call to close Guantanamo Bay
Angela Onikepe on May 11, 2006 1:07 AM ET

[JURIST] US officials have dismissed a call [JURIST report] from UK Attorney General Lord Goldsmith [official profile] to close the facility at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] used to detain terror suspects, saying that the US is working to release detainees who no longer pose a threat, but insisting that the prison is a critical part of the war on terror. US State Department Sean McCormack said Wednesday that: the President has talked about the fact that we'd like nothing better than at some point in the future to close down Guantanamo. Nobody wants to be a jailer for the world. And in fact, we have moved many detainees from Guantanamo back to their home countries or their country of origin, under agreements that would ensure that they're not -- they don't go in the front door and head out the back. And also that they won't be tortured; that they will be treated humanely.
Just the other day, we released several Uighurs; they're now in Albania. So there is a process here for trying to move people through. They do have access to a judicial review, that in the wake of the Supreme Court decision. Again, at some point in the future, we'd like nothing better than to close down Guantanamo. But the fact of the matter is that the people there are dangerous people and we don't -- one thing we don't want to do is release people now who might at some point in the future end up on the battlefield facing our troops or somebody's else's troops or committing acts of terrorism against innocent civilians. In a speech [text] earlier Wednesday, Goldsmith said that Guantanamo should be closed "as a matter of principle."
Australian officials, meanwhile, continue to voice support for Guantanamo Bay. Australian Attorney General Philip Ruddock [official profile] has said that military commissions [JURIST news archive] will be able to produce fair results, but has indicated that some changes should be made to the proceedings. Australian Prime Minister John Howard [official profile] has called for commission proceedings to begin for Australian detainee David Hicks [advocacy website; JURIST news archive]. Howard expressed concern that if Hicks is sent to Australia without being tried by a military tribunal at Guantanamo, he cannot be charged by Australian officials, an outcome Howard called unsatisfactory "given the severity of the allegations made against him." Hicks has been held at Guantanamo Bay for four years and is charged [charge sheet, PDF] with aiding the enemy, attempted murder, and conspiracy to attack civilians. He is currently applying for British citizenship [JURIST report] in hopes that the British government will lobby for his release from Guantanamo. Australia's ABC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|