 |
|

Legal news from Monday, May 8, 2006 |
 |
|


BREAKING NEWS ~ Judge rejects Moussaoui bid to pull guilty plea as 'too late'
Bernard Hibbitts on May 8, 2006 6:00 PM ET

[JURIST] Federal judge Leonie Brinkema late Monday afternoon quickly rejected a surprise bid by September 11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui [JURIST news archive], officially sentenced [JURIST report] only last Thursday to life in prison, to withdraw his guilty plea [JURIST report] and obtain a new trial. In a brief Order Brinkema said: Defendants Motion to Withdraw must be summarily denied on the basis of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e) which provides that [a]fter the court imposes sentence, the defendant may not withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, and the plea may be set aside only on direct appeal or collateral attack. Because defendant was sentenced on May 4, 2006, his motion is too late and must be denied on this basis alone. Accordingly, it is hereby. Brinkema's order is subject to appeal within 10 days.
In an affidavit accompanying his motion filed earlier Monday, Moussaoui said that he wanted to withdraw his original plea becauseI now see that it is possible that I can receive a fair trial even with Americans as jurors and that I can have the opportunity to prove that I did not have any knowledge of and was not a member of the plot to hijack planes and crash them into buildings on September 11, 2001. Read the full text of Brinkema's order [PDF].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ Moussaoui seeks withdrawal of guilty plea
Jeannie Shawl on May 8, 2006 3:54 PM ET

[JURIST] AP is reporting that Zacarias Moussaoui [JURIST news archive] has said that he lied about his involvement in the September 11 terror attacks [JURIST news archive] and has asked to withdraw his guilty plea [JURIST report]. Moussaoui was sentenced to life in prison [JURIST report] last week at the conclusion of a two-month sentencing trial [case docket]. He pleaded guilty in April 2005 to conspiracy charges [indictment] in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks, including conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries, conspiracy to destroy aircraft and conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction.
In his motion to withdraw guilty plea [PDF text], Moussaoui argues: As stated in the attached notarized affidavit from Moussaoui dated May 6, 2005, Moussaoui wishes to withdraw his guilt[y] plea because when he entered the plea, his "understanding of the American legal system was completely flawed." Affidavit at 8. "Because I now see that it is possible that I can receive a fair trial," the Affidavit states, "even with Americans as jurors and that I can have the opportunity to prove that I did not have any knowledge of and was not a member of the plot to hijack planes and crash them into buildings on September 11, 2001, I wish to withdraw my guilty plea and ask the Court for a new trial to prove my innocence of the September 11 plot." Id. at 18. Moussaoui's lawyers note in the motion that "Defense counsel are aware that Rule 11(e) [text] prohibits a defendant from withdrawing a guilty plea after imposition of sentence," but said they filed the document anyway due to their "problematic relationship with Moussaoui." Moussaoui testified at trial that he and "shoe bomber" Richard Reid were meant to fly a fifth plane into the White House [JURIST report] on September 11.
6:00 PM ET - Judge Leonie M. Brinkema has now rejected Moussaoui's plea withdrawal motion.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Thailand constitutional court voids election results
Jeannie Shawl on May 8, 2006 11:17 AM ET

[JURIST] The Constitutional Court of Thailand [official website] on Monday invalidated the results of the country's April 2 parliamentary elections [BBC report], ruling that the "organization of the election by the Election Commission [official website] was unconstitutional," because the poll was held too soon after Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra [official profile] dismissed parliament, preventing candidates from having sufficient time to prepare for elections. In a narrow 8-6 decision, the court annulled the results of the election and in a separate 9-5 decision, the court ruled that new elections should be held. A ruling in a separate challenge to the elections is expected from the Administrative Court of Thailand [official website] on May 16, and that court is expected to reach a similar conclusion.
Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej [official profile] called on the nation's courts late last month to take a more active role [JURIST report] in resolving the country's election crisis [JURIST report] and judges from the Constitutional, Administrative and Supreme Courts have indicated that their rulings on the elections will be consistent [JURIST report]. Thaksin called elections three years earlier than expected in an effort to win support for his troubled leadership. Instead, opposition parties boycotted the April elections and not all seats were filled, forcing Thaksin to announce he would be stepping down [BBC report], though his deputy prime minister said last week that if the court annulled the election results, Thaksin would not have to adhere to this pledge. AP has more. BBC News has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Nepal lawmakers consider impeaching chief justice
Kiran Chapagain on May 8, 2006 10:36 AM ET

[JURIST] Nepal's parliamentarians have said they may impeach Nepal's Chief Justice Dilip Kumar Poudel, accusing him of failing to maintaining independence of the judiciary during the 15-month long autocratic rule of King Gyanendra [official profile; BBC profile], who gave up control of the government after pro-democracy protests [JURIST news archive] last month. The "Chief Justice should either resign or face impeachment," leftist MP Ishwar Pokharel said in the parliament. Speaking in a similar vein, other parliamentarians also demanded an immediate resignation of the chief justice and two other judges who are considered close to Nepal's 58-year-old monarch, warning the judges of impeachment if they ignore their call to resign.
Poudel has been the subject of controversy for his role in deciding a number of constitutional cases relating to people's fundamental rights during the King's direct rule from February 2005 to April 2006 and Nepal's lawmakers have alleged that Poudel "fail[ed] to protect people's fundamental rights during the king's autocratic rule." For instance, the parliamentarians said the chief justice deferred hearings on the controversial Royal Commission for Corruption Control [JURIST report], an anti-graft body formed by King Gyanendra to contain his opponents, as many as 13 times. Similarly, the chief justice, in a controversial order last November, upheld a law [JURIST report] banning Nepal's independent radios from broadcasting news programming
Appointed by the King through a decree, the chief justice was criticized by Nepal Bar Association [group website] early this year for appointing royalist judges to Nepal's courts. The relationship between the chief justice and lawyers has become cold since then. Nepal's lawyers have called for his resignation, but the chief justice has so far rejected their demands.
Kiran Chapagain is a special correspondent for JURIST writing from Nepal. He is an Assistant Senior Reporter for the Kathmandu Post.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ Bush nominates Air Force general Hayden as CIA director
Jeannie Shawl on May 8, 2006 9:32 AM ET

[JURIST] President George W. Bush has nominated Gen. Michael V. Hayden [official profile as director of the Central Intelligence Agency [official website], to replace Porter Goss [official profile], who resigned [JURIST report] unexpectedly Friday. Hayden currently serves as the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence [ODNI website] and several members of Congress have already come out against the nomination [AP report], saying that it is inappropriate for a military general to head the spy agency. Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) [official website], chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, expressed concern Sunday that the Air Force general should not head the civilian agency, saying "he is the wrong person at the wrong place at the wrong time."
Hayden's nomination must be approved by the US Senate and several members of the Senate Judiciary Committee who will review the nomination, including committee chairman Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website], have said that they will use the confirmation hearings to question [Reuters report] the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program [JURIST news archive]. The National Security Agency [official website] began using warrantless wiretaps on communications that took place in part in the US during Hayden's tenure as NSA director, and Hayden has joined other Bush administration officials in defending the program [JURIST report].
11:10 AM ET - In announcing the nomination, Bush said: With the agreement of the Senate, Mike will succeed a great patriot in Director Porter Goss. Under Porter's leadership, the CIA launched a five-year plan to strengthen the agency's human intelligence capabilities. This plan involves increasing the number of operatives and sources in the field, and building up the agency's analytical capabilities, so the hardworking men and women of the CIA have the resources they need to penetrate closed societies and secretive organizations. ...
I'm confident that Mike Hayden will continue the reforms that Porter has put in place and provide outstanding leadership to meet the challenges and threats of a dangerous new century. Mike Hayden was unanimously confirmed by the Senate last year for his current post, and I call on the Senate to confirm him promptly as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Read the full transcript of Bush's remarks.
12:39 PM ET - The White House has now released a fact sheet detailing Hayden's qualifications to head the CIA.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK court rules for Apple Computer in iTunes trademark dispute with Beatles label
Jeannie Shawl on May 8, 2006 8:45 AM ET

[JURIST] The UK High Court ruled [decision text] Monday that Apple Computer [corporate website] did not breach a 1991 trademark agreement [text] with Apple Corps [entertainment website], the record label owned by the Beatles and their families, when the computer company began promoting music products. The Beatles sued the computer company [BBC Q/A], arguing that the online iTunes music store [product website] violated the agreement, which forbids the use of the Apple trademark for any works "whose principal content is music and, or performances." According to the 1991 agreement, Apple Computer would retain the logo for its "core business."
Justice Anthony Mann ruled, however, that because iTunes was "a form of electronic shop" and "does not suggest a relevant connection with the creative work," the computer company was not in breach of the agreement. Lawyers for the record label have said they will appeal the decision. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ Sudan denies accepting UN peacekeepers for Darfur
D. Wes Rist on May 8, 2006 6:30 AM ET

[JURIST] Leading Monday's international brief, a Sudanese government official has denied reports that Sudan would accept UN peacekeepers [CBC report] in the Darfur region [JURIST news archive] as inaccurate and unfounded. Sudan [government website] has continually rejected [JURIST report] all attempts to deploy UN peacekeepers, saying that they feared Western imperialism and would allow only African Union peacekeepers. Sudanese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Jamal Muhammad Ibrahim told reporters that Sudan would consider allowing UN assistance after the peace accords tentatively agreed to on Friday were finalized, but that the final decision would be Sudan's and that the use of UN peacekeepers could not "be imposed on Sudan." The AU has recommended that the UN take over [JURIST report] its massively underfunded peacekeeping operation starting at the end of September, but current estimates put UN deployment at six months from receipt of permission from the Sudanese government. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Sudan [JURIST news archive]. The Sudan Tribune has local coverage.
In other international legal news ... - Nearly fifty protesters were arrested or detained in Egypt this weekend as they conducted rallies against the ongoing disciplinary reviews [JURIST report] of two judges known to favor political reform. The arrests and detentions were permitted under the recently extended emergency laws [JURIST report] that permit Egyptian authorities to arrest any individual engaging in protests that may "pose a threat to national security." The judges have been called before Egypt's Supreme Court to answer for their allegations that the national elections last year in Egypt were invalid due to large amounts of fraud and government interference. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Egypt [JURIST news archive]. AP has more.
- Kenyan Solicitor-General Wanjuki Muchemi [official profile] has announced that the Kenyan legal system will be implementing a program of mandatory alternative dispute resolution (ADR) [LII backgrounder] procedures to attempt to lighten the load on the severely overburdened judiciary. Instead of simply offering parties the opportunity to use ADR facilities, the courts will identify cases that would best benefit from ADR and will mandate those cases to the relevant ADR program. Muchemi said that the goal was to free up judges to deal with the growing number of criminal justice cases that have been delayed due to lack of presiding judges. Training courses for lawyers and judges have already begun. No date has been given for the implementation of the mandatory assignment of cases to ADR. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Kenya [JURIST news archive]. Kenya's East African Standard has local coverage.
- Elections for Italy's new president will begin this week, but a quick selection is unlikely, as the two major political parties in Italy have failed to agree on a candidate. The election of the new president is required before newly elected Prime Minister Romano Prodi [BBC profile] may legally form his new government. The position of president in Italy's government is largely ceremonial, but the election requires three ballots to be won by two-thirds of the members of parliament, which make a quick selection difficult. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Italy [JURIST news archive]. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|