New Jersey court enters split verdict in long-term Vioxx use trial

[JURIST] A New Jersey state court jury on Wednesday rendered a split verdict after two days of deliberations in a joint trial [JURIST report] that pitted two state residents who took the painkiller Vioxx [Merck Vioxx Information Center website; JURIST news archive] against New Jersey-based pharmaceutical giant Merck [corporate website]. The jury found that Merck did not warn either of the men of potential dangers of heart attack and stroke [FDA public health advisory] associated with use of the drug, but awarded different amounts to each plaintiff. Finding that the drug significantly impacted 77-year-old John McDarby, who suffered a heart attack and deteriorating health from taking Vioxx, the jury awarded him $3 million and his wife $1.5 million. But the same jury found that the drug was not the only or main factor in Thomas Cona’s stroke and awarded him only $45 to repay him for his Vioxx expenditures.

On Thursday, the jury will hear evidence on whether the plaintiffs should receive punitive damages. A separate New Jersey jury found Merck not liable [JURIST report] in a Vioxx case last November, but this case is the first where the facts involved long-term use. Merck faces over 9,650 lawsuits in state and federal court over Vioxx. Merck lost a $253 million verdict [JURIST report] in the first Vioxx state claim in Texas, which is currently being reviewed on appeal. Merck was cleared of responsibility in the first federal trial [JURIST report; complaint] and another trial is currently underway [JURIST report] in Rio Grande City, Texas. AP has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.