 |
|

Legal news from Friday, April 28, 2006 |
 |
|


Senior Abu Ghraib officer charged with detainee abuses
Bernard Hibbitts on April 28, 2006 5:55 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Army announced late Friday that it has charged Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan, former head of interrogation operations at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison [JURIST news archive], with seven violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice [text], including disobeying a superior commissioned officer, dereliction of duty, failure to obey a regulation, false swearing, cruelty and maltreatment and interfering with an investigation. He is the highest-ranking Army officer to face criminal charges as a result of the prisoner abuse scandal. Jordan's lawyer had said Tuesday that the charges against his client were anticipated [JURIST report].
Jordan, who was trained as a civil affairs officer and put in charge of Abu Ghraib's Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center [backgrounder] when it was formed in September 2003, admitted to Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba [Times profile], who investigated the Abu Ghraib abuses, that he was a poor choice to oversee interrogations [NYT report]. The Taguba report [PDF text] recommended that Jordan be relieved from duty and reprimanded for "failing to ensure that Soldiers under his direct control knew, understood, and followed the protections afforded to detainees in the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War" and "failing to properly supervise soldiers under his direct authority." In addition, the August 2004 Fay report [PDF text; JURIST report] recommended that Jordan and Col. Thomas Pappas [Wikipedia profile], Jordan's superior, be punished for their roles in the abuse scandal. It was disclosed in January that Army investigators had recommended [LA Times report] Jordan be charged. Army Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Judge rejects DOJ bid to restrict Padilla lawyers' handling of secret evidence
Jaime Jansen on April 28, 2006 3:59 PM ET

[JURIST] The Miami federal judge presiding over the trial of terror suspect Jose Padilla [JURIST news archive] on Friday rejected prosecutors' attempts to require Padillas defense attorneys to sign a "memorandum of understanding" regarding the security of secret evidence the prosecution intends to use in its case. The memorandum, promulgated by the US Justice Department, would have required all lawyers involved in the trial to never reveal anything classified, and destroy copies of all classified evidence provided. Prosecutors plan to use evidence gained from secret FBI investigations, materials provided to the US government by foreign governments, and the results of military interrogations of Padilla during his three and a half year military custody as an enemy combatant. Padilla was charged [JURIST report] last year with conspiracy to murder US nationals, conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, and providing material support to terrorists, and was transferred to civilian custody [JURIST report] in January of this year.
US District Judge Marcia Cooke thought the memorandum was unnecessary. Defense attorneys for Padilla and co-defendants Adham Amin Hassoun and Kifah Wael Jayyousi have already agreed to follow a court order [JURIST report] under the Classified Information Procedures Act [text] placing tight restrictions on disclosure of evidence containing classified material; violations of the Act can be a crime. In addition, the lawyers have to undergo background checks for a security clearance just to view the evidence in a secure room at the courthouse. The trial is scheduled to begin the week of Sept. 5. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rice presses Libya for release of nurses in Bulgarian AIDS case
Jeannie Shawl on April 28, 2006 1:50 PM ET

[JURIST] US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice [official profile] on Friday urged Libyan authorities to release five Bulgarian nurses who are accused of infecting over 400 patients, primarily children, with the HIV virus. The medics have been imprisoned since 1999 and are awaiting the start of their second trial, scheduled to begin in May [JURIST report]. The five Bulgarians, along with a Palestinian doctor, were first convicted in May 2004 and sentenced to death [JURIST reports] for deliberately infecting the children, but the Libyan Supreme Court overturned the convictions [JURIST report] last December and ordered a retrial.
While in Bulgaria Friday, Rice said that "the Bulgarian nurses have been too long in captivity" and called for their release, saying "this is a humanitarian case and it is time for them to come home." Bulgaria and its allies, including the US and the European Union, contend the nurses are innocent and maintain that their confessions were coerced through torture. The six health workers previously argued that the children were infected with the disease prior to treatment by the accused. Nine police officers and one doctor were acquitted [JURIST report] of torturing the health workers [HRW report] last year. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Egypt judges appear before disciplinary panel over election fraud allegations
Lisl Brunner on April 28, 2006 9:22 AM ET

[JURIST] Two Egyptian judges faced disciplinary hearings at the Egyptian Supreme Court Thursday for their criticisms of parliamentary elections [JURIST report] last year, which they and eight other judges claimed were marred by fraud. The two judges, Hesham el-Bastawisy and Mahmoud Mekki, are members of the Judge's Club, an 8,000-member group that is pushing for greater judicial independence. They are among several judges who were stripped of judicial immunity [JURIST report] in February and charged with slander for speaking out against the elections. "Our case is not important," stated El-Bastasiwy, "what is important is ... the right of the Egyptian people to have an independent judiciary, democracy, and free elections." He called the disciplinary panel unconstitutional because the defendants were not permitted to have lawyers, as is mandated by Article 67 of the Egyptian Constitution [text]. The hearing was adjourned and postponed until May 11.
President Hosni Mubarak [official profile] has denied that the government is behind the prosecutions, describing the incident as a clash between the Judge's Club and the Supreme Judiciary Council. President Mubarak is currently contemplating extending the country's emergency laws [JURIST report], which prohibit public demonstrations and allow the government to arrest anyone who is deemed to be a threat to state security. Protesters have gathered outside the Judge's Club for the past nine days, and an estimated 2,000 demonstrated outside the hearing Thursday, according to the Movement for Democratic Change, or Kifaya [BBC profile], the group that has organized the manifestations. The group claimed that 16 protesters were arrested and one was beaten Thursday. Al-Ahram Weekly has local coverage. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

New Hampshire adopts law to protect first place in primaries
Tatyana Margolin on April 28, 2006 6:31 AM ET

[JURIST] New Hampshire Governor John Lynch [official profile] signed a bill [text] Thursday giving the state's Secretary of State flexibility in setting the filing period for presidential candidates, responding to the Democratic Partys efforts to change the 2008 primary calendar and possibly replace New Hampshire as the home of the nations first primary [Nashua Telegraph backgrounder]. In a statement in Concord, Lynch said: In the more than 50-year history of the New Hampshire primary, we have created a strong tradition of giving all candidates a level playing field and of giving all candidates the opportunity to make their cases directly to voters. We have made it possible for the so-called unknown candidates to make their case, without having millions in the bank. In turn, we have demanded much of candidates. We demand that candidates move beyond the rope line and the photo op. We demand that presidential candidates directly answer the hard questions from voters.
The traditions that took New Hampshire 50 years to build cannot simply be re-created in another state. Without New Hampshire, we would end up with campaigns composed of pre-scripted town hall meetings and television advertisements, and where only the best-financed candidates would be able to compete.
That is why New Hampshire's primary should remain first, and why New Hampshire's primary will remain first. Read the full text of the Governor's press release on the bill signing. The first New Hampshire presidential primary was held in 1916; the race gained prominence in 1952 when Dwight D. Eisenhower defeated Republican favorite Robert Taft, and Democratic incumbent Harry Truman lost to Estes Kefauver, putting an end to Truman's aspirations for a second term. The New Hampshire legislature passed a law in 1977 institutionalizing the primary's "first in the nation" status by requiring the Secretary of State to hold the state primary seven days ahead of any similar event in any other state.
The Democrats are concerned with the homogeneity of New Hampshire voters and have already approved adding one state in the eight day period between the Iowa Caucuses and the New Hampshire Primary. At the Democratic National Committee [official website] spring meeting, the Rules and ByLaws Committee heard presentations from states that would like to take over New Hampshires slot; at least 12 states are said to be in the running. California has recently been vocal about its own desire to replace New Hampshire, considering a bill that would schedule its primary as early as January 2. AP has more; the Manchester New Hampshire Union Leader has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Belarus opposition leader jailed
Tatyana Margolin on April 28, 2006 5:02 AM ET

[JURIST Europe] Belarus authorities have sentenced Alexander Milinkevich [official website; Wikipedia profile] and three other opposition leaders to a fifteen-day jail term for attending an illegal demonstration after arresting them [JURIST report] Thursday. At the peaceful rally in Minsk, the capital, Milinkevich called on his supporters to work for a constitutional overthrow of President Alexander Lukashenko [official website; BBC profile]. About 6,000 people attended the rally, traditionally the biggest one of the year in Belarus [JURIST news archive], held on the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster [backgrounder]. The arrests brought outrage from leaders worldwide; US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called them reprehensible, while the spokeswoman for the European Commission [official website] raised the prospect of new sanctions. The EU has already imposed a travel ban [JURIST report] on Lukashenko and 30 others in his government. The head of the OSCE, of which Belarus is a member, called for the immediate release of those arrested [press release].
Milinkevich came a distant second to Lukashenko in March elections [JURIST report] that were condemned as fraudulent by election observers and Western governments. Since the election, over 1,000 opposition members have been arrested, generally for attending unauthorized demonstrations. AFP has more.
Tatyana Margolin is an Associate Editor for JURIST Europe, reporting European legal news from a European perspective. She is based in the UK.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|