 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, April 19, 2006 |
 |
|


Supreme Court considers insanity defense, will rehear 'knock and announce' case
James M Yoch Jr on April 19, 2006 9:32 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday heard oral arguments in Clark v. Arizona [Duke law case backgrounder; merits briefs], 05-5966, a case in which the Court will decide the constitutionality of Arizona statutes governing insanity defenses in criminal cases. In June 2000 at the age of 17, Eric Clark, a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic, shot and killed police officer Jeff Moritz because he allegedly believed that Moritz was an extraterrestrial. Clark was subsequently convicted of first-degree murder. The trial court prevented Clark from introducing evidence that he did not "knowingly and intentionally" commit the crime and ruled that it could only admit the evidence as part of an affirmative insanity defense. The court also held that the evidence did not satisfy the burden for an affirmative insanity defense, which requires defendants to prove that they "did not know the criminal act was wrong." The trial court's ruling was upheld on appeal [decision, PDF].
Clark's lawyers argued that the narrow standard for an affirmative insanity defense and the trial court's refusal to admit the evidence to negate mens rea both violated Clark's constitutional rights to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. State attorneys contend that the Arizona laws ensure that defendants are prosecuted for their crimes and argued against ruling in favor of a right to an insanity defense under the constitution. During arguments, the justices focused heavily on the particular facts of the case and could hand down a narrow ruling that will apply only to Clark, avoiding a decision which could require states to revisit their insanity defense statutes. AP has more.
Also Wednesday, the Court announced that it will rehear arguments in Hudson v. Michigan [Duke law case backgrounder; merits briefs], 04-1360, where police officers with a search warrant entered Hudson's home without first knocking and announcing their presence. Federal circuit and state courts are split on whether evidence seized after a violation of the Fourth Amendment "knock and announce" rule should be suppressed under the exclusionary rule or whether the inevitable discovery doctrine permits the evidence to be used at trial. Oral arguments were originally heard [JURIST report] in January while Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was on the court, and the rehearing is probably for the benefit of her replacement, Justice Samuel Alito. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Media watchdog again accuses Yahoo of helping Chinese police ID journalist
Christopher G. Anderson on April 19, 2006 3:33 PM ET

[JURIST] Internet company Yahoo [corporate website] may be responsible for leading Chinese police to the identity of a pro-democracy activist [press release] who was sentenced to four years in prison, Reporters Without Borders [advocacy website] said Wednesday. Jiang Lijun was jailed in 2003 for allegedly promoting democracy through "violent means" on the Internet. According to Reporters Without Borders, Jiang's 2003 guilty verdict [PDF text, in English] relied on evidence that connected Jiang with an email account known to be used for distributing pro-democracy information, evidence which likely came from Yahoo, but could have come from another activist-turned-informant who also used the account. Yahoo has not commented on the case, but has insisted that it must comply with local laws [JURIST report].
Jiang is the third such activist that Yahoo has been accused of helping police identify. Also in 2003, Yahoo allegedly supplied information that sent Chinese journalists Li Zhi and Shi Tao to prison for eight and ten years respectively. Wednesday's accusations come as Chinese President Hu Jintao [official profile] meets with President Bush later this week. The two are expected to discuss, among other things, freedom of press issues. In another case which has received attention, a lawyer for a Chinese New York Times researcher said earlier this week that the journalist could still face trial [JURIST report] for allegedly disclosing military secrets. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Italy high court confirms Prodi victory in disputed election
Jeannie Shawl on April 19, 2006 12:25 PM ET

[JURIST] The Italian Court of Cassation [official website, in Italian] on Wednesday confirmed [statement, DOC] that Romano Prodi [campaign website, in Italian], former Italian prime minister and head of a center-left coalition, was the winner of the disputed April 9-10 general elections [JURIST report; BBC Q/A] over current Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi [official profile; JURIST news archive]. The court certified the results after judges reviewed the validity [JURIST report] of more than 5,000 provisional ballots, though the court's announcement was not unexpected as preliminary results [in Italian] from the Italian Interior Ministry [official website] put Prodi ahead by as many as 24,000 votes.
Berlusconi had refused to concede the election [BBC report], saying there had been polling irregularities. His regime has been marked by scandal, with an indictment for corruption [JURIST report] last month and charges of false accounting [JURIST report] and bribery [JURIST report] last year in connection with the media business that Berlusconi's family owns. Berlusconi has always maintained his innocence, claiming that the charges are politically motivated. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Freddie Mac to pay $3.8M fine to settle FEC illegal fundraising allegations
Greg Sampson on April 19, 2006 10:57 AM ET

[JURIST] The Federal Election Commission [official website] on Tuesday announced [press release] that mortgage corporation Freddie Mac [corporate website] has agreed to pay a $3.8 million fine [agreement text, PDF] to settle accusations that it directly raised campaign funds for members of Congress in violation of federal election laws. Freddie Mac agreed not to contest the charges brought by the FEC, and the FEC has promised not to pursue further investigations of the company's former lobbyist Mitchell Delk, former CEO Leland Brendsel, or any others involved in the alleged illegal activity.
Freddie Mac, which was chartered by Congress in 1970 to stabilize the mortgage market, had no political action committee, and conducted its political fund raising directly. The FEC accused the corporation of using its corporate funds to do so, in violation of federal election laws. The FEC's investigation documents allege that, among other things, Freddie Mac held more than 75 fund raising events and raised more than $3 million for members of the House Financial Services committee. The $3.8 million fine is the largest ever levied by the FEC in a civil enforcement action. USA Today has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US businessman pleads guilty to Iraq reconstruction bribery charges
Tom Henry on April 19, 2006 8:36 AM ET

[JURIST] American businessman Philip H. Bloom pleaded guilty Tuesday to charges of conspiracy, bribery and money laundering in a corruption scandal that continues to expand as investigators find "more cases of a similar vein in the pipeline." In his guilty plea, Bloom, who was charged [JURIST report] last year, admitted providing Robert J. Stein [Wikipedia profile], a former US official with the Coalition Provisional Authority [official website] and other officials with more than $4 million in bribes, gifts and stolen Iraqi oil proceeds in exchange for massive contracts for three construction companies Bloom operated in Iraq during the reconstruction effort. In an intricate scheme, Bloom allegedly transferred funds from banks in Romania, Switzerland and the Middle East to bank accounts of other suspects. Stein pleaded guilty [press release; JURIST report] to conspiracy, bribery, money laundering and other charges in February.
Earlier this year, US authorities arrested [press release; JURIST report] Faheem Mousa Salam, a US government contractor working as a translator for Titan Corporation in Iraq, on bribery charges after he allegedly offered $60,000 to an Iraqi police official to help push a sale of 1,000 armored vests and a map printer for over $1 million in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) [text]. The New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|