 |
|

Legal news from Monday, April 10, 2006 |
 |
|


Democrats going to court for GOP answers on New Hampshire phone jamming
Katerina Ossenova on April 10, 2006 7:31 PM ET

[JURIST] Democrats will ask a federal judge Tuesday to order Republican Party and White House officials to answer questions in response to a civil lawsuit alleging voter fraud committed during the 2002 New Hampshire phone jamming plot [Wikipedia backgrounder]. During the trial of James Tobin [SourceWatch profile], President Bush's 2004 campaign chairman for New England who was convicted [US DOJ statement] of two counts related to telephone harassment for his role [JURIST report] in the plan to jam Democrats' phone lines during a get-out-the-vote drive, the US Justice Department used exhibits to show that the leaders in the plot had regular contact with the White House and the Republican Party as the plan progressed. An analysis of the phone records used in Tobin's criminal trial show that he made 115 outgoing calls to the same White House political affairs office during the three day period around Election Day 2002. The Republican National Committee, which spent over $722,000 [JURIST report] on lawyers to defend Tobin, said he had committed no crime.
Several key figures in the scheme to jam the phone lines have already received prison time. Allen Raymond, former president of Republican consulting group GOP Marketplace, has received [JURIST report] a five month sentence for his role in a plot and Chuck McGee, the former executive director of the New Hampshire Republican Party [political party website], was sentenced [JURIST report] to seven months in prison and $2,000 in fines. McGee admitted that he had paid a Virginia telemarketing company more than $15,000 in a scheme to jam Democratic Party phone lines with computer-generated calls. The election concerned was a off-term Senate race between Democrat Jeanne Shaheen and Republican John Sununu [official website], who won with 51 percent of the vote. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US officials deny reports of planned nuclear strike on Iran installations
Jeannie Shawl on April 10, 2006 6:21 PM ET

[JURIST] US officials Monday denied [AP report] a report by Seymour Hersh published in the New Yorker that the Bush administration is drawing up plans for military strikes against Iran [JURIST news archive] that would use nuclear weapons to destroy the country's nuclear facilities and prevent Iran from gaining the capability to enrich uranium. President Bush said Monday the reports were "wild speculation" and that his goal of keeping Iran from developing nuclear weapons could be accomplished through diplomacy. Iran said meanwhile that a US attack would be met with a "suitable response" [AP report]. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad [official website] added that he would announce "good nuclear news" [IRNA release] within the next five days.
This is not the first time that a possible US nuclear strike against Iran has been mooted. In a February comment for JURIST, Northwestern University law professor Anthony D'Amato [faculty profile] wrote: A combined US-Israel strike against Iran would have to employ tactical nuclear weapons, and there were signs a month or two ago that the United States was gearing up its military specialists for just such an option. As you will recall, the advance rhetoric was very hot: Iran was obtaining nuclear weapons technology, it broke the seals on yellowcake containers that had been sealed by the UN Inspection Team, it threatened to open a bourse for buying and selling oil in euros, and it announced that Israel should be wiped off the map. Unlike the case with Saddam in Iraq in 2003, Iran in 2006 has numerous long-range ballistic missiles positioned to fire at Israel, France, Germany, and American ships in the Persian Gulf, even after absorbing a surprise military attack. Its missiles are mobile, usually mounted on trucks. It would be impossible to take them out with conventional weapons. The only way to disable and destroy them would be by using above-ground "tactical" nuclear weapons, which can of course reach a wide area and destroy everything in it, especially the electronics used in launching missiles....
A military strike against Iran would involve the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the sparsely populated areas where the mobile missiles are located. As for command-and-control, the military strike undoubtedly involves precision bombing of government and military headquarters. I would predict a strike against the new bourse, perhaps on the theory that it might contain an underground military control center.
Nuclear weapons have not been used in warfare since 1945, and again it may be the United States that first uses them. The UN Security Council is currently considering whether to impose sanctions against Iran [JURIST report] after Iran resumed parts of its uranium enrichment program last year. ABC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Taylor lawyer fights change of venue for war crimes trial
Christopher G. Anderson on April 10, 2006 3:55 PM ET

[JURIST] Charles Taylor [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], the former president of Liberia indicted by the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) [official website], will challenge a prosecutor's motion that seeks to move his trial from Freetown, Sierra Leone, to The Hague in the Netherlands, his British lawyer [JURIST report] announced Monday. Prosecutors told officials of the UN-backed court that a move from the West African nation was necessary to avoid causing unrest among neighboring countries, such as Liberia itself. The UN Security Council is currently considering a resolution to move the trial [JURIST report], but members have not yet agreed [DPA report] on whether to do so, on how to fund a shifted proceeding (estimated to cost some $20M) or on what legal basis a shift might be authorized. But Taylor's lawyers argue that the change of venue could effect the availability of scheduled witnesses and insist there was no evidence that a Freetown trial would be unfair.
Taylor stands accused [indictment, PDF; summary] of war crimes - including impressing children as young as eight into his rebel army - and of orchestrating terrorist acts committed during Sierra Leone's 1991-2002 civil war. SCSL administrators are currently looking [JURIST report] for a country willing to grant Taylor asylum if he is acquitted. If convicted, Taylor will most likely be imprisoned in Sweden. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Immigration supporters rally in cities across US
Krystal MacIntyre on April 10, 2006 2:03 PM ET

[JURIST] Large numbers of immigrants and supporters assembled in cities across the United States Monday for a National Day of Action for Immigrant Justice [advocacy website], urging lawmakers to make it easier for the nation's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants to live in the country legally. The demonstrations come in response to the ongoing debate in Congress on immigration reform [JURIST archive], which has prompted heavy criticism from the US immigrant population. The US House of Representatives passed [JURIST report] a border security bill [HR 4437 summary] last year, but the Senate version of the legislation, S 2454 [summary] stalled [JURIST report] last week after a compromise agreement [PDF summary] fell through.
It's estimated that as many as 50,000 immigration supporters rallied in Atlanta while several thousand protested in Philadelphia, Dallas, San Diego and Salt Lake City. Local events [event listings] were scheduled to take place in every state, and as many as 2 million are expected to attend 136 rallies across the country. A similar protest in Dallas [AP report] on Sunday included as many 500,000 people and organizers hope to get as many as 180,000 protesters at an afternoon rally in Washington, DC [Washington Post report]. AP has more. Bloomberg has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ EU suspends aid to Palestinian Authority over Hamas
D. Wes Rist on April 10, 2006 12:23 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Monday's international brief, the European Union [official website] Council of Foreign Ministers has voted to suspend economic aid to the Palestinian Authority [JURIST news archive] on the grounds that EU law forbids the funding of terrorist organizations and recently elected political organization Hamas has failed to distance itself from its terrorist roots. The EU has pledged to aid the Palestinian government [JURIST report], but has required that Hamas renounce violence as a method of achieving political change, recognize the right of Israel to exist as a nation-state, and agree to abide by all previously accepted peace treaties. Hamas has been listed as a terrorist entity for several years in the EU and legal experts warned that Hamas' election as the ruling party [JURIST report] of the PA would jeopardize financial aid agreements under anti-terrorism laws. BBC News has more.
In other international legal news ... - Morgan Tsvangirai, head of the largest political opposition group in Zimbabwe [government website], the Movement for Democratic Change [party website], has sent a challenge to current Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe [BBC profile] to step down from office and allow internationally organized free elections in the struggling African nation. Mugabe has faced increasing international condemnation [JURIST report] concerning his policies in Zimbabwe, which is facing an agricultural crisis as a result of farm seizure policies Mugabe implemented when he came to power. Tsvangirai has alleged that free elections are impossible in Zimbabwe without international observers, but Mugabe refuses to allow UN, US, or EU election officials into the country during elections because he claims they are biased against his ruling Zanu PF party [party website]. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Zimbabwe [JURIST news archive]. ZimOnline has local coverage.
- Tony Leon, the head of the Democratic Alliance (DA) [party website], the leading opposition political party in South Africa [government website], has announced his intent to submit a bill [press release] to the South African Parliament [official website] on Tuesday that would amend the South African Constitution [text] to require that any politician who chooses to switch political parties while in office be forced to vacate their seat in the legislature. The DA has come out strongly against the recent government push to allow so-called 'floor crossing', calling it an attempt to legitimize bribery of elected officials into the ruling party. Floor crossing had originally been legalized in South Africa in response to the growing level of absolute control exercised by the heads of political parties, but Leon said that the abuse of floor crossing for political gain by the ruling African National Congress [party website] party had made the practice detrimental to the voters of South Africa. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of South Africa [JURIST news archive]. Read the DA official press release. South Africa's Mail & Guardian Online has local coverage.
- Informal Sector Service Center [advocacy website], a human rights agency based in Nepal [government website], released its annual Human Rights Yearbook [text] on Sunday covering the past year in Nepal. The report detailed over 1,500 deaths in Nepal in the last year due to violations of human rights of individuals, with the government's security forces responsible for 815 of the fatalities. The report also accuses the government of using the declaration of a state of emergency [JURIST report] as an excuse to crack down on all attempts at peaceful political gatherings and protests. The report also detailed ongoing human rights violations by the Maoist factions, including the documented abduction by Maoists of nearly 33,000 individuals in the past year, most of them children. The head of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal [official website] Ian Martin told gathered reporters and human rights workers that the UN was concerned about a perceived continuing failure of the Nepalese government to address human rights abuses by government entities. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Nepal [JURIST news archive]. eKantipur.com has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Internet fraud complaints reach record numbers in 2005
Lisl Brunner on April 10, 2006 10:40 AM ET

[JURIST] Americans reported a record $183 million lost to Internet fraud in 2005, a 169 percent increase from the previous year, according to a new report published by the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) [official website]. In its 2005 Internet Crime Report [PDF text; FBI press release], the IC3, a partnership between the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center, reported that the Nigerian letter scam [IC3 backgrounder] accounted for some of the highest losses with an average $5,000 lost per complaint.
Sixty-two percent of complaints received related to Internet auction fraud [IC3 backgrounder] and the median loss for all 231,493 complaints filed in 2005 was $424. The report found that 71 percent of the criminals who could be traced lived in the United States, with the second largest group, 8 percent, living in Nigeria. Hearst News Service has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|