 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, March 30, 2006 |
 |
|


Judge allows Bank of America to pursue counterclaim against Parmalat
Cathy J. Potter on March 30, 2006 8:09 PM ET

[JURIST] Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York [official website] has ruled that Bank of America [corporate website; press release] may proceed with a counterclaim for damages of over $1 billion against bankrupt Italian dairy giant Parmalat SpA [corporate website; JURIST news archive]. In its counterclaim, Bank of America charges Parmalat and its former management with fraud, misrepresentation, conspiracy and other illegal acts. The bank charges that the lawsuit [JURIST report], filed by Enrico Bondi, the administrator appointed by the Italian government to oversee Parmalat in bankruptcy, is simply an effort to "shift the blame for Parmalat's demise from the true culprit -- Parmalat itself -- to victims of the fraud, such as Bank of America."
Parmalat filed for bankruptcy in December 2003, with about $17.3 billion in debt, after realizing there was a $4.9 billion discrepancy in its books. According to Bank of America, Parmalat owed it $647 million at the time of the company's bankruptcy, $462 million of which was unsecured. Calisto Tanzi [OpenFacts profile; JURIST report], founder and former chairman of Parmalat, is currently standing trial in Milan, along with 15 other former executives of the company. Bank of America said that statements by Bondi and testimony emerging in the Milan trial of the former Parmalat executives have shown that in the early 1990s, senior Parmalat officials began hiding losses and engaging in widespread fraud. Reuters has more. Milano finanzo has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN torture investigator probing Falun Gong, Chechnya abuse claims
Joshua Pantesco on March 30, 2006 4:15 PM ET

[JURIST] Manfred Nowak [official profile, DOC], the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture [official website], told reporters Thursday that he is currently investigating allegations raised by the Falun Gong spiritual group [Wikipedia backgrounder], banned by the Chinese government, that thousands of its followers were being held in a Chinese "concentration camp" to be killed for organ-harvesting purposes. The Falun Gong allegations [Epoch Times report; WOIPFG report] are based on information provided by a former Chinese journalist, who says that these government camps, located in the Sujiatun district of the northern city of Shenyang, employed many doctors and housed a crematorium. AP has more.
Nowak also said Thursday that he intends to visit Russia, and specifically the province of Chechnya [JURIST news archive], in either September or October of this year, noting that "there are very, very serious allegations of torture and ill-treatment" in the region. The visit to the war-torn region, where over 100,000 Russian troops are currently posted, will be the first by a UN envoy in at least a decade. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe [official website] adopted a resolution [text] in January condemning the human rights situation in Chechnya [JURIST report], citing numerous cases of murder, disappearances, torture, and other human rights abuses [JURIST report]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

France constitutional council rules youth job law legal
James M Yoch Jr on March 30, 2006 2:55 PM ET

[JURIST] The French Constitutional Council [official website] on Thursday declared [press release] that the First Employment Contract (CPE) [text], a controversial labor law which allows employers to hire workers under 26 for a conditional two-year period at the end of which they can be dismissed without cause, is constitutional. The ruling [decision, in French; case materials, in French] allows President Jacques Chirac [BBC profile], who will address the nation on Friday to discuss his views on the CPE, to approve the law, although he could decide to revise the proposal to appease trade unions, students, and other groups vehemently opposed to the CPE [official backgrounder, in English; JURIST news archive]. In response to the Council's decision, students and trade unions announced plans for another strike next Tuesday to demonstrate against the law.
The CPE has triggered a string of protests [JURIST report] across the country primarily by students and labor unionists who fear it will increase unemployment and destroy job security among younger workers, including some demonstrations that have turned violent [JURIST report]. Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin [official profile] proposed the labor law to provide more job opportunities for French youth and has steadfastly supported the CPE without changes. BBC News has more. Le Monde has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Danish Muslim groups sue newspaper editors for defamation over cartoons
James M Yoch Jr on March 30, 2006 2:23 PM ET

[JURIST] A group of 27 Muslim organizations have filed a lawsuit against the two editors from Jyllands-Posten [media website] who were responsible for the Danish newspaper's publication of caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad [JURIST news archive], which last month set off worldwide protests among Muslims leading to multiple deaths [JURIST report], the burning of Danish embassy buildings [JURIST report], and boycotts of Danish goods. The suit, filed in the Danish city of Aarhus, alleges defamation by editor-in-chief Carsten Juste and culture editor Flemming Rose and seeks over $16,000 in damages, according to the lawyer for the Muslim groups, Michael Christiani Havemann.
The lawsuit follows the announcement [text] by Denmark's Director of Public Prosecutions [official website] Henning Fode that the government would not press criminal charges [JURIST report] against the newspaper or its employees. Declining to file charges earlier this month, Fode maintained that the cartoons were protected by freedom of speech laws and did not violate bans on racist and blasphemous speech. Aljazeera has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Georgia civil rights, religious groups ask DOJ to oppose voter ID law
Holly Manges Jones on March 30, 2006 12:15 PM ET

[JURIST] Civil rights, religious and community groups have asked the US Department of Justice [official website] to block a law that would require voters in Georgia to show photo identification before they could cast their ballots. The bill [PDF text; bill summary] was passed by the Georgia state legislature [official website] and approved by Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue [official website] in January, but under the federal Voting Rights Act [DOJ backgrounder], states with a past history of discrimination must have federal approval before making changes to their election laws. Perdue and other Republicans contend that the bill will lessen voter fraud, but Democrats argue that it will prevent blacks and members of the poor and elderly communities from voting since they are less likely to carry drivers licenses.
A previous version of the law was blocked by a federal judge [JURIST report] last year, and the revised bill offers to issue free photo IDs to voters who need them. If approved, Georgia would be the seventh state to have such a photo identification law for voters. However, even if the Justice Department allows the bill to move forward, it could be blocked by a federal judge again. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Australia federal government threatens veto of ACT civil unions bill
David Shucosky on March 30, 2006 11:38 AM ET

[JURIST] The Australian government has threatened to overturn a proposed same-sex civil union bill [press release] in the Australian Capital Territory [government website] unless substantial changes are made. The bill, introduced by ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope [official profile], would be the first of its kind in Australia and would grant same-sex couples equality in wills and property [Reuters report]. It would not be valid outside the ACT or affect status under national laws.
Prime Minister John Howard and Attorney General Philip Ruddock say the bill blurs the line between marriages and civil unions and would be contrary to the Commonwealth Marriage Act [text]. Stanhope on Thursday called the government's statements "outrageous" [press release], saying: The Federal Government has complained that that the legislation now being considered by the Legislative Assembly would create a parity with marriage. Civil Unions are not marriage and I have been at pains throughout the debate to make that point plainly. Legislating for marriage is the province of the Commonwealth, not of the States and Territories. The civil unions proposed for the ACT would, however, deliver functional and legal equality with marriage under ACT law - a fact from which I do not resile for one instant. That is the intent of the law, and that will be its effect, once it is passed. Under Australian law, territorial legislation can be vetoed by the federal government, but that has not been done since 1997, when Canberra vetoed a Northern Territory bill on euthanasia. The Sydney Morning Herald has local coverage. ABC Australia has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Hastert says Republicans may consider compromise on immigration bill
Holly Manges Jones on March 30, 2006 11:36 AM ET

[JURIST] US Rep. J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) [official website], speaker of the US House of Representatives [official website], has said that he and other House Republicans would be willing to consider an immigrant guest-worker program, which may lead to a compromise with the US Senate [official website] over the controversial immigration bill [text, PDF; bill summary] currently being debated on the Senate floor. Hastert said his party's first priority is to protect the border, but acknowledged there is a need for a temporary-worker program.
US Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website], chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website], said he was pleased with Hastert's remarks and called it a "significant shift" for the House, which passed a bill [JURIST report] last December that would treat illegal immigrants as criminals. A heated debate began Wednesday in the Senate on the revised immigration bill, which was approved [JURIST report] by the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday, with many Republicans voicing opposition to granting citizenship to illegal aliens. Rachel L. Swarns of the New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Sierra Leone court seeks move of Taylor trial to Hague: Dutch foreign ministry
Jeannie Shawl on March 30, 2006 8:31 AM ET

[JURIST] The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs [official website] said Thursday that the Special Court for Sierra Leone [official website] has asked the country to host the war crimes trial of former Liberian president Charles Taylor [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] in The Hague. A spokesman from the Dutch Foreign Ministry said that the request was based on concerns that keeping Taylor's trial in Sierra Leone could cause instability in the region or further threaten peace. Earlier this month, after Liberia formally requested that Nigeria transfer Taylor [JURIST report] to the war crimes court for trial, residents of Sierra Leone expressed similar concerns [JURIST report] that Taylor's presence in the country could stir up fresh violence and undermine peace.
The Dutch spokesman said that the Netherlands would consider the UN-backed court's request, but said that certain conditions would have to be met before the Netherlands would agree. A resolution from the UN Security Council or other legal basis would be needed for the Special Court to sit in The Hague and Taylor would be required to leave the country after a verdict has been delivered. The Sierra Leone court would also be required to work with one of the other international courts that sit in The Hague, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia or the International Criminal Court, to arrange for the use of a court room and prison facilities. Taylor faces 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity under an amended indictment [PDF summary; SCSL case timeline, PDF] for his role in supporting violent Sierra Leonian rebels and masterminding several West African regional conflicts which claimed up to 300,000 casualties. Reuters has more.
10:49 AM ET - A spokesman from the International Criminal Court [official website] has told the BBC that the ICC has been asked to host Taylor's trial and said that the request is being considered. Ernest Sagaga stressed that even if the trial were to be held at The Hague, the case would remain under the jurisdiction of the Sierra Leone court. In a radio address in her country, Liberian President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf said that she supported "a change in venue to a more conducive environment" and said that Taylor must be ensured "the right of a vigorous self-defense." BBC News has more.
4:58 PM ET - According to a statement from the Sierra Leone tribunal, Special Court President Justice A. Raja N. Fernando requested that the trial be tried in The Hague due to "concerns about the stability in the region should Taylor be tried in Freetown." Fernando's request is in accordance with Rule 4 of the Special Court's Rules of Procedure and Evidence [PDF text], which allows the president to authorize a Trial Chamber to operate away from the seat of the court. According to the court: A Headquarters Agreement would need to be secured to allow a chamber of the Special Court to sit outside of Freetown. A United Nations Security Council Resolution would also be required by the Government of the Netherlands to provide the legal basis for the Court to sit within its national jurisdiction. Read the full press release [PDF].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Moussaoui jury weighs death penalty option
Jeannie Shawl on March 30, 2006 7:59 AM ET

[JURIST] The jury in the Zacarias Moussaoui [JURIST news archive] sentencing trial will resume deliberations Thursday to decide whether the al Qaeda conspirator should receive the death penalty for his role in the Sept. 11 attacks [JURIST news archive]. The case went to the jury late Wednesday afternoon and the jury must now decide whether Moussaoui was responsible for any deaths in the terror attacks and therefore eligible for the death penalty. If the jury reaches a unanimous decision that Moussaoui is eligible for execution, the sentencing trial will then move to a second phase to hear testimony from Sept. 11 victims and their families to determine whether the death penalty should be imposed in this case.
During closing arguments Wednesday, the prosecution stressed that had Moussaoui not lied to the FBI after he was arrested in August 2001, investigators would have been able to uncover the Sept. 11 plot and stop the attacks. Moussaoui's defense attorneys countered that there is no guarantee that the FBI "would have run a flawless investigation" and noted that FBI warnings that Moussaoui was a dangerous terrorist had been ignored. Moussaoui, who pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to six conspiracy charges [indictment] last year, took the stand in his own defense [JURIST report] earlier this week, testifying that he and "shoe bomber" Richard Reid [BBC profile] were meant to hijack a fifth airplane and fly it into the White House as part of the Sept. 11 attacks. That testimony, however, conflicted [JURIST report] with statements from Khalid Shaikh Mohammed [Wikipedia profile], the alleged mastermind behind the terror attacks. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|