 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, March 8, 2006 |
 |
|


Moussaoui jury hears testimony from jailed terrorist
Christopher G. Anderson on March 8, 2006 2:59 PM ET

[JURIST] The jury in the Zacarias Moussaoui [JURIST news archive] sentencing trial [case docket] heard testimony Wednesday that, during a visit to Malaysia in 1999, a man matching Moussaoui's description told Islamic militant Fauzi bin Abu Bakar Bafana that he he'd had a dream about flying a commercial airliner into the White House. According to a 2002 videotaped disposition played in court, Moussaoui asked Bafana, then treasurer of an al Qaeda linked group, for $10,000 to pay for flight training in the United States. Bafana also testified that he took Moussaoui to a flight school in Kuala Lumpur, but the tuition there was too expensive. Bafana said he was finally instructed by his al Qaeda superiors to give Moussaoui, who he then knew only as "John", the equivalent of US $1200.
The trial, which concluded its third day on Wednesday, will determine whether Moussaoui - who pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to terrorist conspiracy charges in April - should receive the death penalty or a life prison sentence. Government prosecutors insist that the attacks of September 11 would have been prevented had Moussaoui not lied to FBI agents upon his arrest in August 2001. During Monday's opening statements [JURIST report] Moussaoui's lawyers claimed their client, despite being a devoted member of al Qaeda, had no knowledge of the attacks. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US rights reports name North Korea, Burma, Iran among worst violators
Jeannie Shawl on March 8, 2006 1:51 PM ET

[JURIST] The US State Department [official website] on Wednesday named North Korea, Burma and Iran among the world's biggest human rights offenders in its 2005 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices [State Dept. materials; Rice statement video], saying that "countries in which power is concentrated in the hands of unaccountable rulers tend to be the world's most systematic human rights violators."
The reports also drew special attention to Iraq and China. In Iraq [country report], the Department noted that the number of killings and reports of abuse by Iraqi police increased [Reuters report] during 2005. By definition, the Iraq report only covered local forces, not US or other Coalition forces operating in Iraq.
The US also condemned abuses in China [country report], saying that "the government's human rights record remained poor," and noted increased controls on the media as particularly problematic. Some positive developments were highlighted, however, including the government's return of authority [JURIST report] to the Supreme People's Court to approve death sentences.
Nepal, Uzbekistan, Russia and Pakistan were also singled out for prominent criticism.
The State Department has issued annual assessments of individual countries' records in implementing commitments on human rights reflected in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights [text] since 1977. The reports normally prompt criticism of America's own rights record [JURIST report] from governments implicated in the report, and the introduction [text] to the 2005 report seems to anticipate this: To be sure, violations of human rights and miscarriages of justice can and do occur in democratic countries. No governmental system is without flaws. Human rights conditions in democracies across the globe vary widely, and these country reports reflect that fact. In particular, democratic systems with shallow roots and scarce resources can fall far short of meeting their solemn commitments to citizens, including human rights commitments. Democratic transitions can be tumultuous and wrenching. Rampant corruption can retard democratic development, distort judicial processes, and destroy public trust. Nonetheless, taken overall, countries with democratic systems provide far greater protections against violations of human rights than do nondemocratic states. Reuters has more. VOA has additional coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Guantanamo prosecutor denies torture, stresses transparency of trials
Lauren Becker on March 8, 2006 10:46 AM ET

[JURIST] The chief prosecutor for the military commissions [US DOD materials] at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] denied Tuesday that detainees at the facility were tortured, but acknowledged the vagueness of the definition of torture itself. USAF Col. Morris Davis [official profile, PDF] of the Pentagon's Office of Military Commissions [DOD Directive 5105.70 text, PDF] will prosecute 10 Guantanamo detainees. Davis said in an AP interview before a talk [archived webcast] at Case Western University law school in Cleveland that the military considers its interrogation tactics acceptable, although he granted that some people might disagree and that there was a large gray area between acceptable and unacceptable tactics. He noted that laws dealing with torture generally define it according to its effects, such as significant physical or emotional pain, not on specific methods of interrogation.
Davis said in his talk that the media would be allowed to cover cases when they come to trial in Guantanamo, with an exception for any evidence deemed classified. He stressed the importance of transparency in the proceedings, a reflection of the frequent criticism of the military commissions established by the Pentagon by human rights activists who claim a lack of basic protections and rights for defendants. There are still concerns over whether Guantanamo detainees who remain uncharged will receive a full, fair, and open trial, and whether generally-accepted American criminal justice standards will apply. AP has more. The Cleveland Plain Dealer provides local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ Palestinian presidential powers bill referred to high court
D. Wes Rist on March 8, 2006 9:11 AM ET

[JURIST] Leading Wednesday's international brief, a bill passed by the out-going Fatah party in the Palestinian Authority which granted Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas [BBC profile] greater presidential powers, including the power to set up a constitutional court [JURIST report] staffed by judges picked by the president, has been referred to the Palestinian Supreme Court. The referral follows heated debates in the Palestinian Legislative Council [official website] between Fatah legislators and the now-majority Hamas party over the legitimacy of the bill on Monday that resulted in Abbas losing the powers [JURIST report] until the Supreme Court rules on the issue. Hamas members claim that they have the power to revoke the legislation without having to pass a new law, while Fatah members claim that the bill was properly approved by a legitimate parliament and therefore must be revoked in accordance with the law. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of the Palestinian Authority [JURIST news archive]. BBC News has more.
In other international legal news ... - Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni [BBC profile] told EU and US officials that Ugandan opposition leader Kizza Besigye [BBC profile] would not have to face another trial under the General Court-Martial on charges of treason and firearms possession [JURIST report] while also being tried for the same charges in civilian court. Museveni declined to say whether the charges would be dismissed however, prompting concerns that the GCM proceedings could be re-initiated following the conclusion of the civilian trials. Uganda's Constitutional Court has ruled that the concurrent trial of Besigye by the GCM is unconstitutional [JURIST report] and ordered the GCM to cease and desist. GCM Chairman Elly Tumwine has defied the ruling [JURIST report] however, and proclaimed their intent to continue the prosecution of Besigye and his co-defendants. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Uganda [JURIST news archive]. Uganda's Daily Monitor has local coverage.
- Mexico [government website in Spanish] has announced plans to increase security at its immigration facilities that deal with hundreds of Cuban immigrants seeking entry into the country. The announcement follows the riot and kidnapping of a Mexican immigration official by Cuban detainees who were attempting to bargain for their release into Mexico. Currently, illegal immigrants ineligible for asylum under international law are detained in border facilities that are allegedly worse than most Mexican prisons. Cuba [government website in Spanish] must recognize the detained individuals before they can be returned home, a process often delayed by the Cuban government, allegedly as a punishment to those who left the only remaining communist nation in the western hemisphere. Mexico routinely deals with thousands of illegal immigrants from Central and South America in a matter of days, but Cuban illegal immigrants can face months of detention before being returned. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Mexico [JURIST news archive]. AP has more.
- David Mills, a private lawyer and husband to British Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, is scheduled to hear from prosecutors in Milan, Italy on whether or not he will be indicted on charges of allegedly falsifying testimony [JURIST report] in court for financial gain on behalf of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi [official profile]. Concerns were raised over Mills' relationship with Berlusconi after a financial review revealed that Mills had accepted a "one time gift" of more than £300,000 (GBP) from the Italian prime minister. Berlusconi, often alleged to be the "most corrupt ruler in Europe," and Mills have both denied the allegations. If convicted, Mills could face actual incarceration under Italy's anti-corruption laws. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Italy [JURIST news archive]. BBC News has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICTY cuts Srebrenica massacre sentence of Bosnian Serb commander
Jeannie Shawl on March 8, 2006 8:25 AM ET

[JURIST] Appellate judges at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia [official website] on Wednesday reduced the sentence [press release] of former Bosnian Serb army commander Momir Nikolic [ICTY case backgrounder] to 20 years, saying the lower chamber erred by failing to recognize Nikolic's cooperation with prosecutors. As part of a plea agreement [text], Nikolic pleaded guilty in 2003 to one count of persecution and prosecutors dropped other charges, including genocide, murder and extermination, in exchange for Nikolic's testimony against former superiors. Nikolic became the first Bosnian Serb military officer to publicly tell of the 1995 Srebrenica massacre [BBC backgrounder] from the military's perspective.
In December 2003, Nikolic was sentenced to 27 years in prison [sentencing judgment; JURIST report], with the trial court saying that Nikolic played a significant role in the massacre of over 8,000 Muslims at Srebrenica. In the appeals ruling [judgment text, PDF; summary], the court reduced Nikolic's sentencing because the trial court relied on an incorrect translation of a statement from Nikolic about the number of deaths during the massacre; the trial court erred in allowing the same factor - Nikolic's active role in the massacre - to influence Nikolic's sentence twice when considering the gravity of the offense and as an aggravating factor; and because the trial court failed to take into account the prosecution's assessment of Nikolic's cooperation. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|