 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, February 21, 2006 |
 |
|


Environmental brief ~ Supreme Court hears wetlands, dam cases
Tom Henry on February 21, 2006 8:01 PM ET

[JURIST] In Tuesday's environmental news, the US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments in three cases that challenge the limits of the Clean Water Act (CWA) [text]. The court heard consolidated arguments in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. US Army Corps of Engineers [Duke Law backgrounder; merit briefs], challenges to the federal government's legal authority to regulate private land that does not have a substantial connection to navigable waters. Petitioners argued that regulations promulgated by the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency exceed the scope of the CWA. Under the CWA, landowners must obtain a permit before depositing "dredged or fill material" into the "navigable waters of the United States." The CWA defines "navigable waters" as "waters of the United States," and the agencies have defined "waters" to include wetlands adjacent to navigable waters or tributaries. The Carabells and Rapanos argue that their properties may contain wetlands, but they are not adjacent to navigable waters and should be beyond the scope of the CWA. Indeed, the Rapanos property is some 10 miles from the nearest navigable water. Justice David Souter expressed concern that limiting the scope of the CWA could allow polluters an "end-run around the regulation," but Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia seemed skeptical of allowing the EPA to rely on an overbroad interpretation of "waters" and "tributaries." AP has more.
The Court also heard arguments in S.D. Warren v. Maine [Duke Law backgrounder; merit briefs, a case which involves the regulation of dams. The question in this case is whether water released from a dam should be considered a discharge. If it is, then federally licensed dams would have to comply with state water quality rules in order to receive their license. The plaintiff argues that it is not discharging anything into the water, and that the release of water from the dam should not constitute a discharge under the CWA.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Serbia denies reports of Mladic arrest
Jeannie Shawl on February 21, 2006 2:00 PM ET

[JURIST] The Serbian government on Tuesday denied earlier reports that Bosnian Serb war crimes fugitive Ratko Mladic [ICTY case backgrounder; BBC profile] had been arrested [JURIST report] and would be turned over to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website]. Srdjan Djuric, the head of the government's Office of Media Relations, said that the reports were false [press release], calling the news a "manipulation that harms as well as hinders the Serbian government's efforts to bring the cooperation with the Hague tribunal to a close." Independent broadcaster B92, however, is continuing to report that Mladic has been arrested [B92 report] and is awaiting transfer to the ICTY, despite Djuric's denial.
Mladic, a former general, has been indicted [text] by the ICTY on charges of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes stemming from the execution of over 7,000 Muslim prisoners and the shelling and sniping of innocent civilians during the siege of Sarajevo. Mladic and former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic [ICTY case backgrounder] are considered to be the two top fugitives wanted by the war crimes court. ICTY Chief Prosecutor Carla del Ponte has repeatedly called on the European Union to make Serbia's possible membership in the union contingent on the country's cooperation with the ICTY in locating Mladic. Serb officials met with EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn on Tuesday and part of the discussions focused on Serbian cooperation with the ICTY [press release]. Rehn is scheduled to deliver a report on Serbia's cooperation to the EU at the end of the month. Reuters has more.
7:02 PM ET - A spokeswoman for the ICTY prosecutor has also officially denied reports that Mladic has been arrested. Florence Hartmann said that del Ponte's office was not even aware that there was an ongoing operation to find Mladic and called reports that Mladic had been captured "media hype." AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court to hear sentencing, communications cases
Holly Manges Jones on February 21, 2006 1:36 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court granted certiorari in four cases Tuesday. In Cunningham v. California, the Court will consider whether California's determinate sentencing law is invalid because judges are able to impose increased sentences based on their own findings of fact rather than those of the jury. In Global Crossing v. Metrophones, the Court will consider whether the federal Communications Act [PDF text] allows a payphone service provider to sue a long-distance carrier to recover compensation for coinless phone calls. In Medimmune v. Genentech, the Court will rule on whether a patent license holder must first breach that agreement before suing to challenge the patent's validity. Finally, as reported previously in JURIST's Paper Chase, the Court agreed to hear Gonzales v . Carhart, an abortion case [JURIST report], where it will consider the constitutionality of the federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act [PDF text]. Read the Court's full Order List [PDF]. AP has more.
Also Tuesday, the Court declined to rule on a petition by the US government in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [PDF certiorari petition] to dismiss a constitutional challenge [JURIST report] to the military tribunal process at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive], deciding without explanation to wait until a scheduled hearing in March. The government is arguing that US courts no longer have the jurisdiction to hear cases which challenge military tribunals [JURIST news archive] under the Detainee Treatment Act [JURIST document] passed by Congress last year. AFP has more.
The Court also decided to take no action Tuesday on the appeal [JURIST report] by alleged "dirty bomber" Jose Padilla [JURIST news archive], a US citizen who is challenging his detention for 3.5 years as an "enemy combatant" without having been charged.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Three Ohio men indicted for conspiring to kill US soldiers in Iraq
Holly Manges Jones on February 21, 2006 1:05 PM ET

[JURIST] Three Ohio men have been indicted by a federal grand jury for planning terrorist attacks on US military overseas [press release], according to court documents unsealed Tuesday. The men were recruited by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi [BBC profile], who leads al Qaeda in Iraq, and were involved in recruiting other members starting in November 2004 to prepare for a "violent holy war" against the US and its allied countries. In an announcement Tuesday, US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales called the criminal charges an important part of the fight against terrorism [prepared remarks]. Gonzales said: We cannot wait until an attack happens. We will continue to use our criminal laws as Congress intended, to charge individuals once they conspire to provide support to terrorism or conspire to kill abroad. As alleged in the indictment, these defendants have been living in the United States where they have been engaging in weapons training, sympathizing with the terrorists, and seeking to provide help in order to kill people abroad, including our troops. The indictment [PDF text] does not specify whether any of the planned attacks were to be carried out in the near future, but alleges that the men learned how to create explosives and practiced at a shooting range. The three face charges of conspiring to kill or maim persons outside of the US and conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. One of the men was also charged with threatening to kill or harm US President George Bush. If convicted, they could face life in prison. The three were arrested over the weekend and will be arraigned in federal courts Tuesday. MSNBC has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Report cites franchise bias against minorities, urges Voting Rights Act renewal
JURIST Staff on February 21, 2006 11:08 AM ET

[JURIST] Minority voters in the United States still face unfair poll tactics and barriers that disenfranchise them, according to a major study [PDF; executive summary] released Tuesday by the National Commission on the Voting Rights Act [official website], a project of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law [advocacy website]. The group intends to use the report to lobby Congress to renew the federal Voting Rights Act, set to expire in 2007. Among other findings, the report details purged voting lists, variable times and locations of polling places, and other unfair practices which have the effect of discouraging voting by minorities.
An early product of the civil rights movement, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 [US DOJ backgrounder] allowed federal authorities to oversee elections in states where there were historical racial tensions. Critics of the law, such as Ralph Conner of the conservative Heartland Institute [advocacy website], argue that the increase in minority elected officials and relatively constant voting patterns among minorities since the Act was renewed in 1982 show that it is no longer needed. Proponents counter that the Act must be renewed because its protections will prevent drops in minority voting and representation. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules in religious freedom, arbitration cases
Chris Buell on February 21, 2006 10:55 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] issued two decisions Tuesday, including a ruling in Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal [Duke Law backgrounder], 04-1084, in which the Court held that a church congregation could use hallucinogenic tea as part of a religious ceremony to connect with God. In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts [JURIST news archive], the Court held that the federal government improperly seized the church's hoasca tea, which contains the illegal drug DMT. Roberts held that the government failed to show a compelling enough interest to allow the seizure under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act [text] or that an exemption for the church would result in harm. The church, which blends Brazilian and Christian beliefs, sought a preliminary injunction [JURIST report] against the seizure, which was granted and upheld [opinion text] by the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Read the Court's opinion [PDF text]. AP has more.
The Court also ruled in Buckeye Check Cashing Inc. v. Cardegna [Duke Law backgrounder], 04-1264, in which it held that a contract with an arbitration clause must go to arbitration even if the entire contract is disputed. The Court by a 7-1 margin ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) [text] and federal law should govern the issue rather than state law, as the Florida Supreme Court ruled [opinion text, PDF] in the case. Under the FAA, an arbitration clause may be severable from the rest of the contract, and a general challenge to the contract may be decided by an arbitrator. Read the Court's opinion [PDF text], per Justice Scalia, and Justice Thomas' dissent [PDF text].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Governors threaten legal action to halt ports takeover by Arab company
Chris Buell on February 21, 2006 10:01 AM ET

[JURIST] New York Gov. George Pataki and Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich [official websites] have threatened to take legal steps to block an Arab company's takeover of operations in several major US ports. The governors cite security concerns associated with the acquisition that will leave Dubai Ports World [corporate website] in control of port operations in Baltimore, Miami, New Jersey, New Orleans, New York and Philadelphia, and say they may cancel lease arrangements with the company. Ehrlich said the states should have been notified by the Bush administration before it approved the deal. Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez said he would introduce legislation [news release] along with Sen. Hillary Clinton [official website] that would bar the sale of port operations to foreign governments.
Dubai Ports World, a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates, gained control of US ports operations after a takeover of the British company Peninsular & Oriental Steam. The takeover was approved by the Bush administration after the company agreed to certain security precautions, according to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff [official profile]. Opponents have argued that the United Arab Emirates was used as a financial and operational base for the Sept. 11 terror attacks and for nuclear smuggling involving Iran, Pakistan, Libya and North Korea. In January, President Bush appointed a Dubai Ports World executive [DP World news release], Dave Sanborn, to serve as Maritime Administrator [official website]. AP has more.
3:34 PM ET - Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) [official website] said Tuesday that if the White House does not agree to delay the deal that would allow DP World to take over operation of the ports, he plans to introduce legislation [press release] that would "ensure that the deal is placed on hold until this decision gets a more thorough review." DP World is scheduled to take over operations on March 2. AP has more.
3:55 PM ET - President Bush told reporters Tuesday afternoon that he will veto any bill that would hold up the deal to allow DP World to take over operations of the six ports. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ Sudan rejects UN peacekeeping force in Darfur
D. Wes Rist on February 21, 2006 9:13 AM ET

[JURIST] Leading Tuesday's international brief, Sudan has issued a formal protest to the UN Envoy to Sudan Jan Pronk over his lobbying for a UN peacekeeping force in the Darfur region [JURIST news archive], and has rejected the growing call for the African Union to hand over control of the current peacekeeping mission to a fully international force. Sudan's foreign ministry said it was still willing to accept peaceful support from the UN, but viewed the current push for non-African peacekeepers as a violation of its sovereignty. Sudanese Vice President Ali Osman Mohamed Taha told a US delegation that Sudan was opposed to any use of international forces [Sudan Tribune report]. The protest comes as US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton [official profile] has announced his intent [Sudan Tribune report] to see a UN Security Council [official website] resolution on Darfur by the end of February. UN peacekeeping missions require the consent of the parties involved in the armed conflict unless a Security Council resolution is passed under the mandatory powers of Chapter VII of the UN Charter. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Sudan [JURIST news archive]. The Sudan Tribune has local coverage.
In other international legal news ... - The Christians Association of Nigeria (CAN) has called on the Nigerian state government of Borno to remove the Commissioner for Police and Director of the State Security Service from office, alleging that the two individuals were party to knowledge that the February 19 riot [JURIST report] which resulted in over a dozen individuals being killed and a disputed number of churches being burned was planned ahead of time. The rally began as a protest of the controversial cartoons [JURIST news archive] depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad, but quickly turned violent, with rioters burning large portions of the Christian sector of the northeastern Nigerian city of Maiduguri. CAN has alleged that the commission set up to investigate the crime has been deliberately slow, refusing to interview witnesses who showed up at local police stations to file complaints. The government and CAN also disagree about the numbers killed and wounded, and the number of churches destroyed. The government places the death toll at below 15, including four Muslims, but CAN says it has confirmed that at least 50 of its members are dead and over 40 churches were destroyed or damaged by fire. Nigeria's Daily Sun has local coverage.
- A senior member of the Zimbabwean Justice Ministry has revealed that the Zimbabwean government under President Robert Mugabe [BBC profile] intends to present legislation that would change the steps taken after a currently seated member of parliament leaves or is expelled from his political party. Currently an MP that leaves the party he was elected under must relinquish his seat in Parliament and the seat is opened to a by-election. Mugabe reportedly wants to change the law to allow MPs to change their party alliance and join another party while retaining their current seat. Opposition members claim that the draft legislation is designed to take advantage of the current split in the main opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) [party website]. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Zimbabwe [JURIST news archive]. ZimOnline has local coverage.
- Officials in South Korea's Ministry of Justice [official website] have announced their intent to implement a series of criminal justice reforms that include replacing the death penalty with life imprisonment and restoring national election voting rights to prisoner's convicted of "accidental" crimes. The reform measures will be researched for viability by Justice Ministry officials, who will compare the proposals to other countries' methods already in place. If favorable, the reform proposals would lend support to a death penalty abolition bill presented to the South Korean Parliament in 2004 that is due for a vote sometime this year. Read the official South Korean news report. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of South Korea [JURIST news archive]. Chosun Ilbo has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

California execution delayed after doctors refuse to participate over ethics concerns
JURIST Staff on February 21, 2006 8:31 AM ET

[JURIST] The execution of Michael Angelo Morales [NCADP profile], scheduled to take place just after midnight Tuesday morning, was delayed after the two anesthesiologists on hand to ensure that Morales would not suffer excessive pain during the process refused to participate due to ethical concerns. Morales, convicted in 1983 of murdering a 17 year old girl, had argued that the chemical cocktail to be used in his lethal injection violates the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment found in the Eighth Amendment [text]. US District Judge Jeremy Fogel [official profile] last week ruled [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that California must change the drugs it uses when executing prisoners, and the Ninth Circuit on Sunday approved the presence of a doctor [ruling, PDF; JURIST report] to ensure that Morales would be unconscious during the execution.
Morales' death warrant must be exercised by 11:59 PM Tuesday or state officials will have to seek a new execution order from the trial judge. If the state is unable to find a doctor willing to participate in the execution, it is unclear whether they will be able to secure a second death warrant. Judge Charles McGrath, the original sentencing judge, joined Morales in a request for clemency [LA Times report] from California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger [official website], citing a lack of credibility of a San Quentin State Prison [official website] informant whose testimony helped secure the death penalty verdict. Schwarzenegger denied the clemency request [statement, PDF] late last week. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|