 |
|

Legal news from Monday, February 20, 2006 |
 |
|


Denmark may ban religious slander after Muhammad cartoons furor
Katerina Ossenova on February 20, 2006 6:53 PM ET

[JURIST] The Danish ambassador to Saudi Arabia has said that Denmark will take steps to ban religious slander in accordance with Danish and European laws, according to reports Monday. As a result of the publication of caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad [JURIST news archive], Ambassador Hanz Kingburgh met with Muslim World League [advocacy website] General Secretary Abdullah al-Turki Monday and discussed Denmark's plans to take legal measures as well as offering the apology offered by the Danish newspaper which was reprinted in the Saudi press over the weekend. The cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad first appeared in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten [media website] in September and were later reprinted [Le Monde slide show] in other European and world papers, sparking violent protests the Middle East and Asia. UPI has more. EU officials have to this point been unreceptive to suggestions that the regional block adopt formal laws banning religious slander, but EU foreign affairs chief Javier Solana said last week after a meeting with the head of the Organization of the Islamic Conference [official website] that the EU and the OIC "are considering certain ideas to safeguard and protect religious values in general, but the time is not appropriate to disclose the details." UPI has more.
Meanwhile, a Shariat Court in India has issued a religious decree sentencing the author of the Danish cartoons to death. The fatwa [Wikipedia backgrounder] was issued Sunday after an Indian provincial minister announced a cash reward for the person beheading the cartoonist, but its significance in India is debatable as Islamic law does not formally apply in the Hindu state. Local Muslim leaders insist, however, that it is applicable wherever Muslims live. Press Trust of India has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US, Vietnam resume human rights dialogue after three-year hiatus
Krista-Ann Staley on February 20, 2006 2:47 PM ET

[JURIST] The United States and Vietnam have ended a three-year suspension on talks regarding human rights and religious freedoms [HRW backgrounder] in the communist country, Barry Lowenkron [official profile], US Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour [official website] said Monday. The suspension began when the US cancelled the annual Human Rights Dialogue with the Government of Vietnam in 2003 due to a lack of progress on the issues. In his announcement, Lowenkron highlighted progress made since that time, including the release of activist Nguyen Khac Toan [BBC report] in January, but urged the government to release more prisoners of conscience and emphasized the need for Hanoi to do more.
The US currently regards Vietnam as a "country of particular concern" (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 [text; State Dept. materials] for "particularly severe violations of religious freedom" [State Dept. report], but Hanoi agreed in 2005 to take steps to advance and protect religious freedom. Vietnam then defended its human rights record in its first White Paper on Human Rights [PDF text]. Despite the lack of dialogue between the countries at the time, US lawmakers last June called for a discussion [JURIST report] of rights issues when Vietnamese Prime Minister Phan Van Khai [Wikipedia profile], the first Vietnamese head of government to visit the US since the end of the Vietnam War, met with President Bush [BBC report] last June. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Frist says changes to surveillance legislation unnecessary
JURIST Staff on February 20, 2006 8:24 AM ET

[JURIST] Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) [official website] said Sunday that existing legislation governing domestic surveillance [JURIST news archive] does not need to be rewritten or updated. Appearing on CBS News' Face the Nation, Frist also said that he believed that the National Security Agency does not need to obtain a court order [transcript, PDF] before engaging in domestic eavesdropping under the White House's terrorist surveillance program [White House position paper].
Other members of Congress, however, are pushing for updates to the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act [text]. Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) [official website], the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday said that the NSA domestic spying program must comply with FISA. Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) [official website], chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee has called [JURIST report] for the NSA program to be brought under the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court [FJC backgrounder] and Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [official website], chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee] has said that he is working on legislation [JURIST report] to explicitly bring the surveillance program within the purview of the FISC. The White House has insisted that the program is legal, but officials seem willing to entertain a proposal [Washington Post report] from Sen. Mike Dewine (R-OH) [official website] that would give lawmakers more power in authorizing domestic surveillance. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|