Supreme Court hears arguments in oil price-fixing case

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments Tuesday in the consolidated cases Texaco v. Dagher and Shell Oil v. Dagher [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], where it will decide whether a lawful joint business venture between two or more companies violates the Sherman Act where the venture sets product prices. A group of 23,000 gas distributors brought suit alleging over $1 billion in damages due to a 1998 price-fixing deal between ChevronTexaco [corporate website], then Texaco, and Shell [corporate website] when the two companies formed two lawful joint ventures to oversee the marketing and distribution of their gasoline on the west and east coasts. The joint venture then set a price at which the venture sold its gasoline. In argument the justices appeared skeptical of plaintiffs' counsel's argument that the two companies created the joint ventures to drive up then-low oil prices. AP has more.



 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.