 |
|

Legal news from Monday, January 23, 2006 |
 |
|


Iraq parliament to ignore constitution on meeting deadline
Krista-Ann Staley on January 23, 2006 2:58 PM ET

[JURIST] Iraq's newly-elected parliament will ignore a constitutional provision on setting the date for their first meeting, officials announced Monday. According to the constitution [JURIST news archive; JURIST document], approved in the 2005 October referendum [JURIST report], parliament is to meet 15 days after the final certification of an election to elect a speaker and president. Final results [JURIST report] of the December 15 election [JURIST report] were announced last week and certification is expected around February 3, resulting in a constitutional deadline for the first parliamentary meeting around February 18. According to officials, however, rival factions need time to negotiate and have yet to establish a timetable for the first meeting. While the constitution specifies consecutive selection of leadership positions, party leaders have agreed that they intend to present key positions simultaneously at the meeting, and would like to identify a president, prime minister and speaker before that time. According to Abbas al-Bayati, a Shiite official, consensus has been reached to retain Kurdish leader Jalal Talabani [BBC profile] as president and to give the Shiite Alliance the right to name the prime minister. Sunni leaders would then be able to propose a choice for speaker. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush, former NSA head defend domestic surveillance program
Holly Manges Jones on January 23, 2006 2:48 PM ET

[JURIST] US President George Bush on Monday defended his authorization of the domestic surveillance [JURIST news archive] program employed by the National Security Agency (NSA) [official website], saying that he was acting under a Congressional mandate to protect the US from terrorist attacks. In a speech [transcript] at Kansas State University, Bush said the Terrorist Surveillance Program [White House position paper], as it is now being referred to by the administration, has been repeatedly reviewed in order to ensure that it is within the bounds of the law. Bush also said: Federal courts have consistently ruled that a President has authority under the Constitution to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance against our enemies. Predecessors of mine have used that same constitutional authority. Recently there was a Supreme Court case called the Hamdi case. It ruled the authorization for the use of military force passed by the Congress in 2001 -- in other words, Congress passed this piece of legislation. And the Court ruled, the Supreme Court ruled that it gave the President additional authority to use what it called "the fundamental incidents of waging war" against al Qaeda.
I'm not a lawyer, but I can tell you what it means. It means Congress gave me the authority to use necessary force to protect the American people, but it didn't prescribe the tactics. It's an -- you've got the power to protect us, but we're not going to tell you how. And one of the ways to protect the American people is to understand the intentions of the enemy. I told you it's a different kind of war with a different kind of enemy. If they're making phone calls into the United States, we need to know why -- to protect you. Also Monday, General Michael Hayden [official profile], the government's second-highest ranking intelligence officer and former NSA director, defended the program by describing the system as "narrowly targeted" [AP report]. The surveillance program, which was first revealed [JURIST report] last month, allows the NSA to monitor conversations of individuals suspected to be linked to al Qaeda without first obtaining a warrant. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Uzbek opposition demands open trial for leader on corruption charges
Krystal MacIntyre on January 23, 2006 1:04 PM ET

[JURIST] In a statement issued Monday, Uzbek opposition group Sunshine Uzbekistan [party website] called on authorities to hold open proceedings [statement, in Russian] when opposition leader, Sanjar Umarov [official profile] goes on trial. Umarov, a business man with ties to the United States, was arrested in October [JURIST report] and faces charges of embezzlement, hiding foreign currency, tax avoidance, bribery, and other economic crimes. The government claims that Umarov and his brothers headed a criminal group which damaged the country's economy. Nodira Hidoyatova, another Sunshine Uzbekistan coordinator also faces trial on similar charges. The United States and Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] have both criticized Umarov's arrest [JURIST report], saying that it was politically motivated. Sunshine Uzbekistan focuses on increasing Western investments and free market reforms. The coalition became popular after an uprising of violence in Andijan [JURIST news archive] last May where the group and other rights activists demanded economic reform and dismissal of the Uzbek government. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Pinochet wife, children indicted on tax evasion charges
Alexandria Samuel on January 23, 2006 12:43 PM ET

[JURIST] Several family members and former employees of former Chilean president General Augusto Pinochet [JURIST news archive] were indicted [PDF text] Monday on tax evasion charges. Judge Carlos Cerda issued arrest warrants for Pinochet's wife, four of his children, daughter-in-law, former attorney and secretary, following the release of indictments that all filed false tax returns. Pinochet faces tax evasion and corruption charges [JURIST report] himself, and his wife and son have already been charged as accomplices [JURIST report] relating to those allegations. The former dictator, who has also been indicted on human rights charges [JURIST report], remains under house arrest [JURIST report] until his trial. AP has more. From Santiago, La Nacion has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court rules in campaign finance, sovereign immunity cases
Holly Manges Jones on January 23, 2006 10:42 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] handed down decisions in three cases Monday, including a decision in Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission [Duke Law case backgrounder], where the Court remanded the case to the federal District Court in Washington, DC to reexamine whether the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 [text] violates the First Amendment right to free speech when it bans corporate and union sponsorship of political issue ads that mention a specific candidate from airing within two months of the election. The Federal Election Commission [official website] issued an injunction in 2004 barring Wisconsin Right to Life [advocacy website] from airing an advertisement mentioning US Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) [official website] two months before his reelection. The lower court had ruled [text] against the anti-abortion group, prompting a request that the Supreme Court strike down [JURIST report] the part of the law that called for the two-month ban. The Supreme Court said the lower court had misread a 2003 ruling [text] by the high court which upheld a federal campaign finance law, saying that ruling "did not purport to resolve future as-applied challenges," and returned the case to the lower court. Read the Court's per curiam opinion [PDF text]. AP has more.
In Central Virginia Comm. College v. Katz [Duke Law case backgrounder], the Court declined to apply the state sovereign immunity doctrine to claims brought under the Bankruptcy Clause. The case involved four state schools in Virginia which did business with Wallace's Bookstores prior to the store's bankruptcy. The liquidating supervisor had sued to collect the debts allegedly owed to the store, but the schools moved to dismiss the suit based on state sovereign immunity, which the bankruptcy court denied. The decision of the bankruptcy court was upheld by the district court and also affirmed [text] by the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals [official website]. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower courts, holding that the bankruptcy trustee was not barred from suing by sovereign immunity. Read the Court's opinion [text] per Justice Stevens, along with a dissent [text] from Justice Thomas, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia and Kennedy. Reuters has more.
In the final case Monday, Unitherm Food Systems v. Swift-Eckrich [Duke Law case backgrounder], the Court ruled that a court of appeals may not review the sufficiency of evidence supporting a jury verdict under Rule 50(a) [text] of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when the party requesting the review did not also renew the motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b) [text], nor move for a new trial under Rule 59 [text]. Read the Court's opinion [text] per Justice Thomas, along with a dissent [text] from Justice Stevens, joined by Justice Kennedy.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Saddam denounces 'Iranian meddling' in Iraq
Holly Manges Jones on January 23, 2006 10:15 AM ET

[JURIST] Saddam Hussein [JURIST news archive] condemned "Iranian meddling" in Iraq after being briefed on major Iraqi, Arab and international affairs over the weekend, his defense team said Monday. Defense lawyer Saleh al-Armuti said Hussein had complained of not being kept up to date on world news so his lawyers filled him in during a five-hour meeting at the jail where Hussein is being detained. Hussein said the Iranians have a "long history of rancor, the worst in the world," and questioned why the Arabs allowed Iran to participate in Iraq's occupation. Iranian justice officials have called for Hussein to be prosecuted [JURIST report] for atrocities allegedly committed during the eight-year Iran-Iraq war [BBC backgrounder; Wikipedia backgrounder] in the 1980s, and have prepared a list of charges [JURIST report], including genocide, crimes against humanity, violations of international law, and using prohibited chemical weapons. Armuti also said that the former dictator's defense lawyers plan to file a lawsuit [DeHavilland report] against US President George Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair [official website] in a European international court this week regarding what they are calling "the illegal invasion and occupation of a sovereign state." Hussein is also requesting that his trial be moved from Baghdad to Qatar or Jordan. Hussein's trial [JURIST news archive] is set to resume Tuesday. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

IFJ condemns 'targeted assassinations' of journalists
Lisl Brunner on January 23, 2006 9:46 AM ET

[JURIST] The number of targeted assassinations [EJIL paper, PDF] of journalists is on the rise, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) [advocacy website] said Monday in its annual report, Targeting and Tragedy: Journalists and Media Staff Killed in 2005 [PDF text, Part II, Part III]. The IFJ reports that 89 of the record 150 media staff who died last year during the course of their work were victims of targeted killings, including 35 in Iraq, 10 in the Philippines, and 12 in Latin America and Haiti. In the report, the IFJ decried a "culture of neglect and indifference" [press release] that it says surrounds the deaths, criticizing law enforcement officials for conducting few serious investigations into the epidemic of violence against the media and calling on the United Nations to take action. At least 61 deaths were caused by accidents rather than deliberate killings, including 48 resulting from the December 6 crash of a military aircraft in Tehran. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Activists mark 33rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade
Lisl Brunner on January 23, 2006 9:02 AM ET

[JURIST] Activists around the country marked the 33rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade [opinion] with demonstrations on Sunday. In Minnesota, San Francisco, Idaho and Michigan, hundreds of anti-abortion and abortion rights demonstrators gathered in front of state capitols. Activists in Michigan marked the anniversary by debuting Michigan Chooses Life, an initiative to change the state constitution to legally define a person as existing at the moment of conception. In Washington, DC, abortion rights activists gathered in front of the US Supreme Court in advance of Monday's anti-abortion demonstration on the mall, for which President Bush has offered his support [AP report]. Many are speculating about how the nomination of Samuel Alito [official profile; JURIST news archive] to the Supreme Court will affect the January 22, 1973 decision. Alito has refused to give his views on the issue [JURIST report], saying that he would keep an open mind [JURIST report] on the issue. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

International brief ~ AU summit opens with controversy over Sudan chairmanship
D. Wes Rist on January 23, 2006 6:09 AM ET

[JURIST] Leading Monday's international brief, the 2006 African Union [official website] summit opened Monday in Khartoum, Sudan, with a sharp controversy over the potential chairmanship of the organization by a regime accused of directly contributing to over 300,000 deaths and nearly two million Internally Displaced Persons in Darfur [JURIST news archive] over the past several years. Traditionally the chairmanship of the AU is held by the nation hosting the annual summit, but rebel leaders from Darfur have announced that they will cut off all peace negotiations with Sudan if Sudanese President Omar al-Beshir [BBC profile] is allowed to chair the regional group. Five African nations have formally requested al-Beshir to withdraw his nomination for the post and several more western and southern African nations have expressed concern over the position going to the head of a country likely to be the subject of AU action over the next year. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Sudan [JURIST news archive]. The Sudan Tribune has local coverage.
In other international legal news ... - A representative of the opposition political parties in Nepal [government website] has filed a formal Public Interest Litigation (PIL) with the Nepal Supreme Court [judicial website] against a Nepalese Home Ministry Order imposed on January 18 that denies political parties the right to hold assemblies, conduct peace protests, and stage sit-ins within the capital city of Kathmandu. The order was invoked under Section 6(3)(a) of the Nepal Local Administration Act 2028 BS which allows the government to deny these rights on the basis of suspicion of Maoist infiltration of political parties. The PIL alleges that the order is illegal under Article 112 of the 1990 Nepal Constitution [official text], which holds that any law prohibiting free assembly of recognized political parties is void, and has asked the Supreme Court to overturn the order. On Saturday, Nepalese police used tear gas to disperse protestors defying the ban [JURIST report] in Kathmandu, arresting 300. The Court has set Tuesday as the preliminary hearing date. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Nepal [JURIST news archive]. NepalNews.com has local coverage.
- The political cabinet in Kuwait [official information website], led by Prime Minister Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Sabah, has requested that the Kuwaiti Parliament hold hearings on the medical fitness of Emir Sheikh Saad al-Abdulla al-Sabah, who is set to take the oath of office on Tuesday. Sheikh Saad, 76, took over the leadership of Kuwait on January 15, following the death of his cousin Sheikh Jaber al-Ahmad al-Sabah, but his ability to rule the tiny Arabian nation has been questioned in light of his documented health difficulties. A member of the Kuwaiti cabinet confirmed that a letter had been sent to the Kuwaiti Parliament asking them to conduct a special review of Sheikh Saad under the laws of succession. According to the Kuwait Constitution [text], the cabinet can have a medical report on the state of the Emir presented to the Parliament, which can then remove the Emir by a two-thirds vote in the 50 person legislature. If Sheik Saad is removed, Prime Minister Sabah is his most likely replacement. JURIST's Paper Chase has continuing coverage of Kuwait [JURIST news archive]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|